21cents Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Those are all core players. You dont trade your core players you trade guys who was good but are replaceable. Orakpo, Mason, Betts, Monty, Horton, Fred Smoot, devin thomas, malcolm kelly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CM916 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 If you want to get something for the guy, it has to be someone like Moss unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soup Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 The only player that a team would fork over a good pick is Cooley and maybe moss what would be cool is if the redskins could trade campbell to the raiders for a 1st or 2nd round pick. they would go for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkypoo Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=303237&highlight=trade The above is a pretty good thread on the subject started a little over a week ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Late Night Roach Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Who could we trade away? I'd do it like Tuna and trade away half the team :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskinzfan30 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Rogers is the only one we should trade. Rogers is out of here next year any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskinzfan30 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Rogers. Hopefully we could get a 2nd or a 1st for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrJL Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 I'm not that interested in talking trades this season, but I am thinking about next offseason. The Post had an article on Jeremy Jarmon the other day, talking about how much he'd progressed and suggested him as a possible replacement for Daniels. I'm certainly cool with the idea of Jarmon as a starter, but replacing Daniels means Orakpo would end up becoming a full time LB. I'd kind of like to see Orakpo and Jarmon as out starting ends and was wondering if anyone might be interested in Carter. Also does anyone think there will be a lot of trades this offseason. Teams have gotten used to going out and getting new players. But with no CBA there will be more Franchise Players and more RFA's. So they might end up going out and swinging deals more than signing free agents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HRNY4ZRNY Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Rogers- for a 2nd Landry- for a 2nd and 3rd Betts, Cartwrite, Davis and Kelly- For a 2nd and 3rd Then our draft would look like this 1st- LT 2nd- RB 2nd- Gaurd 2nd- Right Tackle 3rd- Center 3rd- RB 4th- LB 5th- S 7th- BPA ---------------- FA- CB FA- LB FA- DE FA- QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rexrode21 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Trade for Kirk Morrison from Oakland. He's pretty legit and the Raiders are always great to target in a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrelgreenie Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 The trade deadline (Oct. 20 at 4pm EDT) is fast approaching and if the Redskins lose to carolina, Jim Zorn/Sherman Lewis for Former Seattle offensive consultant Keith Gilbertson or offensive coordinator Gil Haskel or former Broncos QB Coach/OC Jeremy Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskinzfan30 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Rogers- for a 2ndLandry- for a 2nd and 3rd Betts, Cartwrite, Davis and Kelly- For a 2nd and 3rd Then our draft would look like this 1st- LT 2nd- RB 2nd- Gaurd 2nd- Right Tackle 3rd- Center 3rd- RB 4th- LB 5th- S 7th- BPA ---------------- FA- CB FA- LB FA- DE FA- QB That is a horrible set of trades. We don't trade Landry. Why do you think teams don't go deep on us? It's because of Landry. We shouldn't trade Dvis and Kelly. No one will give up anything for Betts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff_K Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 hell .... trade 97% of the team, at least if we had 45 rookies on the squad we would expect to do poorly in the beginning and have hope for improvement instead of even older players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wvtbred Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Steven Jackson is being shopped, quietly but he is definitely available. Only issue is the cap hit for StL. Maybe Jason and one of our RB's for him? The Rams need a back-up QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Steven Jackson is being shopped, quietly but he is definitely available. Only issue is the cap hit for StL.Maybe Jason and one of our RB's for him? The Rams need a back-up QB. Definitely didn't know that about Jackson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.