HeHateMe Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 holy ****!! a cowbum fan make QB jokes?you HAVE to be kidding me. your QB is more known for the joke of a GF he has then anything else. ONLY espn hypes him up and even he knows that he sucks. your owner clowns your RB for "not having heart" your WRs (even the new one) cant seem to get along. the ONLY thing your offense has that is worth a damn is Witten. BM, We're talking about non-Redskin fans overall opinion on the impact of the AH sigining in Washington. Not talking about the Cowboys or Romo sits to pee. I gave my opinion. And judging by a lot of members on this board and even the so-called "experts" on the NFL Network and other stations, I'm clearly not alone with my opinion. But for the record, regardless of late season failures, off field drama, etc., we all know every GM in this league is taking Romo sits to pee over Campbell. But I'm not and won't hijack this thread into a QB debate. I've too much respect for you, this board, and the OP. Anywho, good to see you responding to my posts. I was beginning to think you'd forgotten about me. PS - That was hardly a "joke" about Campbell. It was simply an opinion as to where I think Washington's issues lie and need to be addressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 The "100M" factor is irrelevant.Everyone looks at the number, and simply thinks he's an 100M dollar man. In hindsight it's a 4yr 48 M dollar deal. Haynesworth will never see 100M, and even if he DOES it would mean that he would be a pro bowler for the next 5 to 6 years. Highly doubtful I think it's a smart move simply because of what Haynesworth brings. You HAVE to double team him, which allow lanes for the rest of your defense. Regardless, one player is still over 10% of the cap each season for the first four. That's a pretty significant number. That said, there's only a handful of players that potentially justify such a number. AH is one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 HHM, You dont really think you are going to take some stab at my team and expect me to just sit back and not retort, are you? Come on man...weve been respected adversaries long enough to know better then that. I respect your opinion (dont agree with it for ****) and I like that you are here during the off season. I hope you took my retort as nothing more then me speaking up for my QB and my team. I'd expect the same from you.. edit: forgetting about you would be like forgetting how to shotgun a beer..impossible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Good to see HHM in here posting in good style like he did for years. But then, I like all kinds of crazy stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Good to see HHM in here posting in good style like he did for years. But then, I like all kinds of crazy stuff. Always a pleasure Jumbo. But I must ask....Are you related to Benjamin Button? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Reggie White to the Packers was infinitely bigger.I'm not big into spending a fortune on one or two players. However the Redskins failing to win a bidding war against the Packers for Reggie was the biggest FA miss in Redskin history. Hopefully Haynesworth will become the best FA signing in their history. He certainly has that potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 WOW! TR1 you really look foolish in this thread. (What's new, huh?) Do you actually believe what you type? First off, Moss was TRADED to New England for a 4th round pick. He wasn't a free agent. Did I ever say he was a free agent? I was talking about undrafted additions to a team. Sorry if I confused you. It doesn't take much. Secondly, even if he was a free agent pick up, its not even close to GB picking up Reggie White. LOL, you asked how many Super Bowls GB went to; well they went to 2 and won one of them. New England won THREE Super Bowls WITHOUT Moss, yet with him they've yet to get there. You claim they went undefeated because of Moss? Hilarious! They were good long before Randy Moss. GB wasn't good before Reggie White. Yes, Favre helped. But Reggie White was their leader and a force. Did I say Reggie White wasn't in my top three? I just think Moss is a bigger acquisition. Time will tell. Please try to read and comprehend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger.Staubach Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 the ONLY thing your offense has that is worth a damn is Witten. Foolish homerism combined with petty jealousy. For a team that has nothing on the offensive side, I find it surprising that the Cowboy's beat the Redskins in every major statistical category (outside of rushing yards). Heck, the 0-16 Lions scored more points than the vaunted Washington offense. It's good to know that Witten is worth an extra 6 points and 47 yards/game. You guys might want to consider cutting Cooley if his production is that bad. Either that, or Witten has the best contract in the history of the league. "If you don't know what you are talking about, your mouth would be best used for chewing." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Did I ever say he was a free agent? I was talking about undrafted additions to a team. Sorry if I confused you. It doesn't take much. Actually, you did. This is probably in the top three free agent signings in NFL history. I'm thinking Randy Moss to NE was only bigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 tr1, take a few days off. You are making yourself look really bad in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger.Staubach Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Actually, you did. :hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Actually, you did. If you didn't understand what I meant, why didn't you bring up the FA issue in the subsequent two posts? HHM was the first to bring up trade vs FA. Basically it's immaterial, since the gist of my statement was that the Haynesworth deal is in the top three of player acquisitions, EITHER through free agency or trade. I know you're a little slow, WB, so I'm trying to help you out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 This is the tr1 we know and love. Caught red handed and still refuses to admit he was wrong. Awesome. "I know what my written words clearly state but, um, I sorta meant something else. Well, actually I didn't mean something else but I'm caught being wrong so I'm going to spin that I meant something else. Oh, by the way, you are an idiot for not being able to disregard what I wrote and try to figure out what I would say I meant after being proved wrong." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 This is the tr1 we know and love. Caught red handed and still refuses to admit he was wrong. Awesome. "I know what my written words clearly state but, um, I sorta meant something else. Well, actually I didn't mean something else but I'm caught being wrong so I'm going to spin that I meant something else. Oh, by the way, you are an idiot for not being able to disregard what I wrote and try to figure out what I would say I meant after being proved wrong." WB, again, if you didn't know what I meant, why didn't you 'correct' me? You posted twice in response to my post. Seems you look a bit silly, doesn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 tr1, around here we are used to you being wrong and then pointing fingers at everyone else. You are clearly wrong yet you try to take task at me for not pointing out you were wrong immediately. Are you serious? Is this the best you can do. I have an idea. Be a man once in your life. Just admit you made a mistake. No big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 tr1, around here we are used to you being wrong and then pointing fingers at everyone else. You are clearly wrong yet you try to take task at me for not pointing out you were wrong immediately. Are you serious? Is this the best you can do.I have an idea. Be a man once in your life. Just admit you made a mistake. No big deal. :rotflmao: Thanks, WB, I needed a laugh today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Nothing changes the fact that you were wrong, called on being wrong, tried to deny you were clearly wrong, tried to deflect being wrong on other posters and generally acted like a baby. No one expects anything different. Just do 2 minutes of research before posting or admit when you are clearly wrong. Everyone does it. Except you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Nothing changes the fact that you were wrong, called on being wrong, tried to deny you were clearly wrong, tried to deflect being wrong on other posters and generally acted like a baby. No one expects anything different. Just do 2 minutes of research before posting or admit when you are clearly wrong. Everyone does it.Except you. Apparently you knew what I meant in the immediate two posts after my statement not to 'correct' me. True or false? Now, HHM has thrown in some semantics, and you've just soiled yourself in excitement about 'catching' me on something. :rotflmao: Too funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Your prevailing point that Moss was a bigger addition than White was more incorrect so I decided to start there first, tr1. However, nothing changes the fact that you were wrong and later in the thread derided someone for saying that you said he was a FA.....which you did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Your prevailing point that Moss was a bigger addition than White was more incorrect so I decided to start there first, tr1.However, nothing changes the fact that you were wrong and later in the thread derided someone for saying that you said he was a FA.....which you did. Semantics. My wording may have been faulty, but even you knew what I meant. I think we're starting to bore readers in the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Semantics? You called him a FA. Period. Later, someone told you he wasn't a FA and you told him he was stupid because you never said that.....which you did. You are as good as damage control as you are getting the facts right the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Semantics? You called him a FA. Period. Later, someone told you he wasn't a FA and you told him he was stupid because you never said that.....which you did. You are as good as damage control as you are getting the facts right the first time. We're both wrong WB. How come you haven't realized this yet? This is the greatest signing in the history of all sports. Get it through your thick skull! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Semantics? You called him a FA. Period. Later, someone told you he wasn't a FA and you told him he was stupid because you never said that.....which you did. You are as good as damage control as you are getting the facts right the first time. Poor structure in my sentence...that's all I'm guilty of...as evidenced by your immediate two posts where you discussed the merits of each acquisition. I'll try to be more eloquent and succinct...though, it'll probably be lost on you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 We're both wrong WB. How come you haven't realized this yet?This is the greatest signing in the history of all sports. Get it through your thick skull! Frankly, it's difficult to judge how a person will react when guaranteed a pile of money; however, this guy is a talent that doesn't come along often...and we already had a good defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Frankly, it's difficult to judge how a person will react when guaranteed a pile of money; however, this guy is a talent that doesn't come along often...and we already had a good defense. No one on this site will be able to say, with a straight face, that adding a player of AH's caliber is a "bad" move or acquisition. However, to immediately pronounce it as a top 3 signing in NFL history without seeing him play a down, a game, a season, or even the duration of his stay in Washington is just silly. We know you're the biggest homer round these parts, but even that statement makes me chuckle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.