Koolblue13 Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision such as Cheek v. U.S., 111 S.Ct. 604 (1991). The Cheek decision says, in pertinent part: "If the defendant had a subjective good-faith belief, no matter how unreasonable, that he was not required to file a tax return, the government cannot establish that the defendant acted willfully." The Reliance Defense Method is covered in extensive detail in our new report #TL16G by Don Sovereign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimmySmith Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 What do you call a person who cheats on their taxes? Mr. Secretary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 Boy, I wonder if any board members work for the IRS.That would kick this thread up a notch. You're going to prison. BAM! That's what I was thinking. Someone just got a job and was trolling for bonuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'KanSkinFan Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 Read the thread and didn't take your poll "none of your business comes to mind" Thought about it~ and agree Geithner should NOT be appointed:shhh: http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/14/transition.wrap/ No, I didn't stutter~ he should not be appointed ; I don't drink political :koolaid: :thumbsup: Agree? Thanks for the thread and have a nice day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 No. Why would you risk the consequences over something like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoot Point Really Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 I've never cheated death either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 Hell no. The consequences are too signficant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
addicted Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 Yes I have. And I was called on it late last year when the IRS said they had proof I had sold 166k in stocks in 2006. I got that all settled though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sisko Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision such as Cheek v. U.S., 111 S.Ct. 604 (1991). The Cheek decision says, in pertinent part: "If the defendant had a subjective good-faith belief, no matter how unreasonable, that he was not required to file a tax return, the government cannot establish that the defendant acted willfully." The Reliance Defense Method is covered in extensive detail in our new report #TL16G by Don Sovereign. Why does it not surprise me that you're one of those guys? They love making an example of the tax protesting types. I'm sure the IRS will be in touch with you soon. I wonder if they have internet access in the "big house"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
techboy Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision such as Cheek v. U.S., 111 S.Ct. 604 (1991). The Cheek decision says, in pertinent part: "If the defendant had a subjective good-faith belief, no matter how unreasonable, that he was not required to file a tax return, the government cannot establish that the defendant acted willfully." The Reliance Defense Method is covered in extensive detail in our new report #TL16G by Don Sovereign. The unfortunate part is that anyone who knows about this decision automatically no longer falls under its purview. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.