Joncevensen Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 The assumptions of this poll are: no jail time for Burress, he will be able to play in 2009 The justifications I see for this are, we have a strong locker room The negatives, one bad apple can spoil an entire pie plus there might be sensitivity on the team to someone who mishandled a gun dangerously. MODS: I know there is a thread out there already, I made a poll so the opinions could be consolidated and to get a read on the boards general sentiment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRSmith Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 But just think about who is going to interfere with him on a route, takle me ***** and I will bit a cap in your ass, provided I don't shoot myelf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fire3fighter4 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 is this thread for real?.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSkins2006 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 No thank you. DT and MK for development imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sellyoursol Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 No. Just no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt. Kaos Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 This is not for real, is it? There is no way I want this idiot on the Redskins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan328 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 No. Just no. no thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21-FOR-LIFE Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 YES....I put him in the class of randy Moss attitude wise.....so if you can get him for cheap with heavy incentives take the risk, and if it starts to go bad cut him.....Just like the D. Hall situation, remember D> hall was waiting in a tunnel to fight x teammates just weeks before we signed him for cheap, and he seems like he could turn out to be a steal with the great veteran leaders we have on this team..Just my thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L30L Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 No. I would rather go get Chad Johnson or TJ Hoshmendakfnda;lsfnadslfmasldf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smashmouth1980 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 Nah...too much on his plate. Plaxico will more than likely be fed up with the rebuilding of this team, get tired of losing to the Giants...be caught up in too many off the field issues...he's just too big of a risk. Let DT and MK develop...those guys have a lot of potential...and you figure, ARE might be gone after this season...that leaves Moss, Kelly and Thomas....that's outstanding!!! I'd sign Vick upon his release before Buress! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kvarlo12000 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 Hell no. Just Hell no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor4Life Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 I bet the Cowboys will sign him. He's a perfect candidate for Jerrah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimm Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 Do Not Want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 Please get him. He's an elite reciever who just needs a second chance. He's nothing like TO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan1523 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 He'll either go to Dallass or Oakland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pastha40 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 No chance. No more locker room cancers. We should develop the guys we have and go after quality FA's. Like someone else said...go after one or both bungles receivers. Could definitelty get Ocho Stinko on the cheap; and while hes definitely an eccentric player...I wouldnt consider him a cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman#21 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 no, he has a history of problems not just this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FerndaleSkins Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 Can he play on the offensive line? We have more pressing needs than wide receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blue Joe Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 No chance. No more locker room cancers. We should develop the guys we have and go after quality FA's. Like someone else said...go after one or both bungles receivers. Could definitelty get Ocho Stinko on the cheap; and while hes definitely an eccentric player...I wouldnt consider him a cancer.Plax isn't a cancer. He's just a screw-up. Where as Ocho Cinco deliberately tries to hurt his own team down, Plax just can't get out of his own way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmuss1 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 The answer is NO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 No chance. No more locker room cancers. We should develop the guys we have and go after quality FA's. Like someone else said...go after one or both bungles receivers. Could definitelty get Ocho Stinko on the cheap; and while hes definitely an eccentric player...I wouldnt consider him a cancer. Neither one of them are cancers. You're just saying cancer to make it sound like you've got a good reason to not want him here. Name how he's a cancer. He had one incident earlier this year with Coughlin. This whole Gun Shot ordeal is just him being an idiot. He took a gun with him because he feared for his safety, and shot himself because he's retarded. That's silly, not Cancerous. If anything, Ocho Cinco is more of a cancer, yet you say he's not. He's the one who did everything to get out of his crappy team's locker room. He's not a cancer, but he's more of a cancer than Plax. I don't see why we don't add an elite receiver to our team. Get rid of Thrash, and let Burress start. Put Moss in the Slot, unless one of our Rookies still aren't up to the task of starting. Let ARE handle punts exclusively (unless he doesn't restructure his contract). Please, all of you ignorant people, stop saying Cancer just because you can. Think about what the hell you're saying. It only makes you look stupider. You can say that he's unfocused, or that you simply want to stick with what we've got, but you can't say No to Plax because he's a cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasjhughes Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 The assumptions of this poll are: no jail time for Burress, he will be able to play in 2009 quote] Why don't we just assume that Art Monk discovers the Fountain of Youth, drinks, and comes back tomorrow at his prime. It's about as likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RawBBQSauce Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 He'll either go to Dallass or Oakland. Exactly what I was gonna say. Jerry and Al don't give a ****, they'll sign any convict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldysknzfn1 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 I voted no and letting MK & DT develop. I don't care for Plax's attitude and his recent troubles. He's immature for a 31y/o and we don't need that IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero21 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 If we could get him for a DeAngelo Hall-like deal, then yes. But we wouldn't be able to, and anything more I'd be unsure of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.