Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Economics 101 Mr. Obama


RedskinWill

Recommended Posts

If you think Obama is the only socialist running, think again. Both he and McCain will further erode our economy when their policies are enacted. The only difference is where the money is spent. Don't let party blinders cloud reality. they both suck arse

Bravo!!! :applause::applause::applause::applause:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple economics... you give big tax cuts to the upper 2% of the population in terms of income, large chunks of that money gets immediately stuck in their saving accounts. They are rich after all, they can already buy whatever. Handing them a $100,000 extra will seem nice to them, but it won't alter their spending habits that much. And if it is not spent, it is saved, and therefore it does not "trickle down."

So instead, give more in tax cuts to the middle 95% of Americans. You would be surprised by just how much more of that money ends up purchasing Christmas presents for the family, buying new cars, simply purchases made possible by that tax cut. When that money is spent, retailers gain, auto manufacturers gain, the economy picks up. Jobs are created. Simply economics. So enough of your socialism BS, you need to stop buying all the GOP soundbytes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple economics... you give big tax cuts to the upper 2% of the population in terms of income, large chunks of that money gets immediately stuck in their saving accounts. They are rich after all, they can already buy whatever. Handing them a $100,000 extra will seem nice to them, but it won't alter their spending habits that much. And if it is not spent, it is saved, and therefore it does not "trickle down."

So instead, give more in tax cuts to the middle 95% of Americans. You would be surprised by just how much more of that money ends up purchasing Christmas presents for the family, buying new cars, simply purchases made possible by that tax cut. When that money is spent, retailers gain, auto manufacturers gain, the economy picks up. Jobs are created. Simply economics. So enough of your socialism BS, you need to stop buying all the GOP soundbytes.

So where do I send you your welfare check?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple economics... you give big tax cuts to the upper 2% of the population in terms of income, large chunks of that money gets immediately stuck in their saving accounts. They are rich after all, they can already buy whatever. Handing them a $100,000 extra will seem nice to them, but it won't alter their spending habits that much. And if it is not spent, it is saved, and therefore it does not "trickle down."

So instead, give more in tax cuts to the middle 95% of Americans. You would be surprised by just how much more of that money ends up purchasing Christmas presents for the family, buying new cars, simply purchases made possible by that tax cut. When that money is spent, retailers gain, auto manufacturers gain, the economy picks up. Jobs are created. Simply economics. So enough of your socialism BS, you need to stop buying all the GOP soundbytes.

You didnt actually prove him wrong either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So where do I send you your welfare check?

Where's your response? I'm sorry if I laid out exactly what Obama's economic plan is and it sounded pretty reasonable, but you could at least entertain me with a response to anything I just said. I made some pretty clear arguments there, so support yours. Until then, this thread=fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Credible enough if you understand Capitalism. Let me know when you run a company someday? Then you can talk. I employee over 100 people so I understand well enough.

There's another thread in the tailgate with grammar correction, and the usual debate over how important or unimportant it is to use proper grammar.

In my opinion, if you take a haughty tone, correct grammar helps your cause, and incorrect grammar hurts it.

You employ over 100 people, you don't "employee" them. It's not even worth mentioning except for the tone of your post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't know he had a point... All he had was a title and a stupid link that doesn't work, so I responded to the title. You care to explain how that tax system is socialist? I am curious to see how you think it is.

sure! Paying for a tax cut for one group while penalizing another. Pretty simple really. That said, The GOP tax policies are just as socialist in my book. Like I said, both McCain's and Obama's economic plans suck arse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's another thread in the tailgate with grammar correction, and the usual debate over how important or unimportant it is to use proper grammar.

In my opinion, if you take a haughty tone, correct grammar helps your cause, and incorrect grammar hurts it.

You employ over 100 people, you don't "employee" them. It's not even worth mentioning except for the tone of your post.

You're correct but I don't have time to spell check or correct my errors. It's not that important in here. It was important when I was in medical school but not here. Thanks for your concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's another thread in the tailgate with grammar correction, and the usual debate over how important or unimportant it is to use proper grammar.

In my opinion, if you take a haughty tone, correct grammar helps your cause, and incorrect grammar hurts it.

You employ over 100 people, you don't "employee" them. It's not even worth mentioning except for the tone of your post.

Good move, ignore the truth, but worry about grammer on a message board.

:cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...