iMeast Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Another week with little love (but slightly more) from the "experts" although the accuscorer seems to like our Skins a bit. The Redskins get 2/3 on YAHOO! Sports, just 4 of 10 on ESPN, 2 of 5 on Sunday Countdown, and the Madden Simulation shows us nothing but love once again picking the Redskins to trounce the Cards 6 to 37. ESPN: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent ESPN Sunday Countdown: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/notebook?page=sundaycountdown08 Madden Simulation: http://sports.espn.go.com/videogames/simulation/nfl?id=3595801 YAHOO! Sports: http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/pickem HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Jaws just loves Jason Campbell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMeast Posted September 19, 2008 Author Share Posted September 19, 2008 Jaws just loves Jason Campbell What up with your sig man? Angry at the ES members for something? HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackdaddydean Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Accuscore was the only one to get us right last week on the ESPN picks. It picked us again. That's good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinzbeachman Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I dont think they know crap on Countdown. All 5 picked Green Bay over Dallas. While I hope the Cheeseheads kick the living crap out of the Convicts and put TO and Homo out for two weeks(we play the Pukes next week) I dont believe the Pack has seen a pass rush like the Pukes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMeast Posted September 20, 2008 Author Share Posted September 20, 2008 I dont think they know crap on Countdown. All 5 picked Green Bay over Dallas. While I hope the Cheeseheads kick the living crap out of the Convicts and put TO and Homo out for two weeks(we play the Pukes next week) I dont believe the Pack has seen a pass rush like the Pukes. I am not too sure why everybody seems so high on the Packers this year. While they have looked alright who have they played? Nobody, Minnesota and Detroit. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinklein Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 I am not too sure why everybody seems so high on the Packers this year. While they have looked alright who have they played? Nobody, Minnesota and Detroit. HTTR Yeah, but winning 2 divisional games to start the season is huge, regardless of how inconsequential the opponents may seem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westcoasthog Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Oh wow! Chris Carter didn't pick us? I'm shocked! That guy is such a :jerk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMeast Posted September 20, 2008 Author Share Posted September 20, 2008 Yeah, but winning 2 divisional games to start the season is huge, regardless of how inconsequential the opponents may seem. Yeah division games to them seems so lame compared to the NFC (B)East. I just wouldn't be high on any team that was playing a team from the (B)East. Oh wow! Chris Carter didn't pick us? I'm shocked! That guy is such a :jerk: I will second that :jerk: and raised you another :jerk: ! HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DButz65 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 teh .............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zCommander Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 I was watching NFL TA last night and Jamie Duke picked the cards because butter fingers aka Kurt Warner hadn't drop the ball yet. I was beside myself with that intellectual "expert" comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paredskinsfan Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 madden has Kelly with a TD. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger5 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 The madden sim engine QB completion percentages are way too high. It's as if Colt Brennan is playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 The madden sim engine QB completion percentages are way too high. It's as if Colt Brennan is playing. Honestly now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fnkdctr(007) Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Hey now Skins Madden Counts Madden Counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redshu Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Honestly now. Satire....satire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuicyJ Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Inside the NFL picks http://sports.sho.com/infl/picks.html Skins across the board~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMeast Posted September 20, 2008 Author Share Posted September 20, 2008 madden has Kelly with a TD. Nice. Yeah I am hoping that happens. Either him or Devin Thomas it really doesn't matter, I would just like to see some production out of the rookies. The madden sim engine QB completion percentages are way too high. It's as if Colt Brennan is playing. I knew that was coming ... it was only a matter of time. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 What up with your sig man? Angry at the ES members for something? HTTR No. It's pretty much the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 The madden sim engine QB completion percentages are way too high. It's as if Colt Brennan is playing. You're pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMeast Posted September 20, 2008 Author Share Posted September 20, 2008 No. It's pretty much the truth. Have you ever been on a Pukes message board? Wowzers those guys sound like meth addicts ... and by sounds like meth addicts I mean they are probably missing ice cream scoop like chunks from their brain and are of low intelligence, not the I am looking for a fix right now meth addicts. Oh course with Pukes it could be either. I know many ESers tend to jump to conclusions and freak out, but calling the whole ES fanbase idiots is a sweeping generalization. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UltimateSkinFan616 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 There seems to be more confidence in the skins among the experts after last week. I don't know if that's a good thing because the team usually does better when there's a chip on their shoulder. Of course, Arizona is probably a little overconfident as well after starting 2-0. Hopefully they'll start feeling the pressure and we can bring them back down to size! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMat184 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 While I'm confident we'll beat the Cards, I honestly don't think its right to be critical of these "experts". Really the only thing we've proved is that we're a consistently inconsistent team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chow184 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 I see alot of people not believing in the skins,I hope we prove them wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirtyfive2seven Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Sayin the Packers are good because they beats teams in their division is like saying the Seahawks are good because they... oh wait, nevermind, they suck this year and they are still in a weak conference I love hating Seattle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.