UltimateSkinFan616 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Who do you want? I like Hackett, but the guy can't stay healthy. Johnson is a big reciever, but he's unproven. Rotoworld said the Redskins were going after him. Personally, I'd go for Johnson because he doesn't have Hackett's injury history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsAllDay34 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Neither...OCHO CINCO all the way wow that would be awsome if we could pull off trades to get D. Hall and CJ but that will never happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGSKINS Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Hackett because he knows the Z Mans system Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNGwithOUTaCrwN Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 djjjjjjjjj....dude, how is this even a question. bryant doesnt have experience as a big time wr like we need Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch_Lives59 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 IF we really had to, I would say Hackett...but the only Johnson I would take would be Chad.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Hackett for me... Mostly cause I don't know much about BJ (ha, BJ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNGwithOUTaCrwN Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Hackett for me... Mostly cause I don't know much about BJ (ha, BJ). and cuz we dont need another player for the cowgirls to be making fun of..... (BJ!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskns21 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 djjjjjjjjj....dude, how is this even a question. bryant doesnt have experience as a big time wr like we need And Hackett does??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truant Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Neither. But if I had to choose it'd easily be Hackett. Living in AZ and seeing the NFC West more than I would like, Johnson sucks while Hack is frail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyConway Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 BJ. Even though Truant thinks he is the next Rod Gardner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flock53 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Johnson! Sounds like Truant has a personal grudge to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins Fan 82 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I would say Johnson. DJ Hackett is to fragile, but he knows Zorny's O. I would say witch ever we can get cheaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 something tells me Hackett would spend more time with the medical staff than he did actually playing in games, so i'll go with Johnson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70CHIP! Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Johnson ! He's healthy and doesn't have many miles on him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UltimateSkins Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I like Hackett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever21 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Honestly I'd rather Johnson, I think Hackett is terribly overated and I think Johnson will demand a smaller price. Of course truth be told Oakland ****ed us and any other team over that wants to sign a FA WR by giving Walker that dumbass contract that was soooo way over his value. Now Hackett and Johnson are going to want deals worth tons more than they deserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HogNose Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Hackett is the lesser of two evils. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakotaskinsfan Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I think if the team is to choose between the two, Zorn will go with Hackett due to him knowing Zorn and the WCO. Personally i would pass on both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Neither. But if we HAD to sign either one, I'd begrudgingly accept Hackett. I'd rather have Limas Sweed than both of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aireskoi Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Bryant Johnson stepped up pretty well when he was called on to be the #2 guy. I think he has the bigger upside. Hackett knows the WCO, but has been injured too often so far. I guess I'm OK either way, I just don't know if either is worth a big financial risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meek Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I read somewhere that this DJ Hackett character was fragile. Then I decided to look for myself and I realized that he's played in 33 games in the past 3 seasons and so I wasn't as worried anymore. Not to mention he's a phenominal talent. DJ Hackett over Bryant no question about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins5235 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 neither. keep reche caldwell and look for somebody in the draft. we wont improve a whole lot by getting either one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins5235 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 with moss, randall -el , caldwell with are set with the three WR spot. then we can work on mix, mccullen, espy and whomever we get at draft day in order to get them ready to be the WR of the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grego Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Honestly I'd rather Johnson, I think Hackett is terribly overated and I think Johnson will demand a smaller price. hackett 'overrated'? by whom? why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddyLeeGhostHunter Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I read somewhere that this DJ Hackett character was fragile.Then I decided to look for myself and I realized that he's played in 33 games in the past 3 seasons and so I wasn't as worried anymore. Not to mention he's a phenominal talent. DJ Hackett over Bryant no question about it. Agreed. Not only that but he usually owns when he plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.