MEANDWARF Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 With the way Golston and Montgomery are playing at DT, I doubt we would be going after a DT in the 1st round. Agree with others 2 safties and a TE, nah. Atlanta are not picking 2nd, plus they need a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 after 1st round is comletely irrelevant to predict... no way is any pick proejcted after round 1... Redskins may go after DE, do we really need a DT unless they are Warren Sapp like??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinssince82 Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 The Pete Kendall deal I believe was for a 5th rounder this year...however if he played a certain number of snaps it escalated to a 4th rounder in 2009. Since he has started every game I assume we keep our 5th rounder this year and lose next years 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Pablo Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 This is the worst mock ever. A DT in the first round? That's one of the few positions where we have some quality depth. On top of that, we draft two safeties over a single linebacker? We have some serious depth concerns at LB considering Godfrey is probably going to go back into retirement, Rocky is injured, and MW's contract gets completely out of control next season. Moreover, our DE rotation is left exactly the same with Daniels becoming more expensive and a year older. Also, I'm almost 100% sure we keep our fifth round pick this year because Kendall got a lot of playing time (becomes a 2009 4th rounder). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Like the fact that they have us choosing a guard in round 2. But a Dtackle in round 1 is silly. We got Golston, Monty, Grif and Alexander alone. add Bocshetti (sp) and we got a solid core DT group. We could use: DE, OG, CB (Rogers is a ?? in 2008 and Macklin will be gone), S, WR, OL, OLB in that order IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1njskinsfan Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 2 Safties and a TE.. ...plus dont we have our 4th or 5th....i know we have 1 of them.Pretty bad draft if you ask me....at least for the skins my exact thoughts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cahones01 Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Thank god someone else posted that this draft has Gholston going undrafted. That speaks volumes about this mock draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corrupt3d Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 after 1st round is comletely irrelevant to predict... no way is any pick proejcted after round 1... Redskins may go after DE, do we really need a DT unless they are Warren Sapp like??? I didnt do too bad last year with my seven round mock. Granted, even though I put names in, I looked at the position that I put and what actually got drafted to calculate my hit percentage. Had a 72% accuracy, which aint bad, in my opinon. Skins blew me away by taking Jordan Palmer and HB Blades. I had us taking a TE in the seventh and an LB in the fifth (actually had us takign Blades there ) but I had us doing OG and a C in the sixth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corrupt3d Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Thank god someone else posted that this draft has Gholston going undrafted. That speaks volumes about this mock draft. Lets not forget Slaton as a top-15 pick. He's far from it, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgunner Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 DE,OL, WR 6"2 min. do it please!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins26 Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 I cant see Ellis lasting that long in round 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawyer5500 Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 This is a horrible draft for the Redskins. And they wrongfully gave the Jets our 5th rounder when it will be ours. The Jets get our 4th rounder in 2009. 2 safeties? A tight end? A 1st round Defensive Tackle? what horrible picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superozman Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Why do people waste their lives about doing something this intricate when 97% of it won't play out? I'm glad i didn't waste 5 minutes of my life reading it all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#21Taylor4Ever Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 It amazes me that even with Golston and Montgomery playing well, people still think we should take a damn DT. Wake up people!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuraitengai Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 thats one of the 'best mock drafts'??? its a horrible draft. we dont draft a DT in the first round. we have monty and golston already if we do cut griff. first rounders are starting material, we dont need a starter at DT. and we dont go for 2 safeties and a TE. thats absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 2 safeties is retarded. And we don't need a TE. Much of what will happen depends on what we pick up in FA. I'm hoping we either manage to pick up Jared Allen, Alan Faneca or the CB from Oakland. A DT in round one seems a bit out of place seeing how our depth is at that spot at the moment with Monty, Griff, Golston, and Alexander. No way is Calais Campbell going that high unless he has a monster combine. He is an impressive physical specimen but had a pretty mediocre year. Gholston isn't there but even so...unless he has a bad combine he is going before we pick probably. They also didn't include Malcolm Kelly in the WR class, who may very well declare. I wouldn't be upset if we picked him or Adarius Bowman up in the 1st unless Sweed really slips to the 2nd and we can get him there. Kelly is a beast and has amazing hands. So do the other two but their stock has dropped since they have been injured a bit. First round I say DE or WR. I think a big playmaking WR is something we could really use. After that I say go O line and D line mainly with perhaps a CB in a later round or another project QB. EDIT: IF Vernon Gholston happened to be there we'd be nuts to pass on him. The guy is a pure animal. I watched their game vs Michigan and he completely owned Jake Long at least a few times and at 6-4 264 he has good size to be an every down DE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gator Bait Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 2 safeties is retarded. And we don't need a TE. Much of what will happen depends on what we pick up in FA. I'm hoping we either manage to pick up Jared Allen, Alan Faneca or the CB from Oakland. A DT in round one seems a bit out of place seeing how our depth is at that spot at the moment with Monty, Griff, Golston, and Alexander. No way is Calais Campbell going that high unless he has a monster combine. He is an impressive physical specimen but had a pretty mediocre year. Gholston isn't there but even so...unless he has a bad combine he is going before we pick probably. They also didn't include Malcolm Kelly in the WR class, who may very well declare. I wouldn't be upset if we picked him or Adarius Bowman up in the 1st unless Sweed really slips to the 2nd and we can get him there. Kelly is a beast and has amazing hands. So do the other two but their stock has dropped since they have been injured a bit. First round I say DE or WR. I think a big playmaking WR is something we could really use. After that I say go O line and D line mainly with perhaps a CB in a later round or another project QB.EDIT: IF Vernon Gholston happened to be there we'd be nuts to pass on him. The guy is a pure animal. I watched their game vs Michigan and he completely owned Jake Long at least a few times and at 6-4 264 he has good size to be an every down DE. we are going to be 25 million over the cap, we will be lucky to keep the majority of our current starters, let alone get impact players in free agency like jared allen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 The player i defintely seeing washington after is Jo-Lonn Dunbar ILB 6'0" 225 Boston College Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 we are going to be 25 million over the cap, we will be lucky to keep the majority of our current starters, let alone get impact players in free agency like jared allen Come on, you know we hear the "cap hell" thing every year but yet we still manage to either get big FAs or pay a high draft pick (Landry). The exact same stuff was said last year and the year before. Since we'll be picking later in the draft we can probably find a way to get an impact FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 The player i defintely seeing washington after is Jo-Lonn Dunbar ILB 6'0" 225 Boston College I agree he is a player to watch, but I think that we will be good as far as MLB with Fletch for a couple more years and then Blades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirtyfive2seven Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Ok last year someone wrote up an EXCELLENT Piece on WHY the skins should draft LaRon Landry in the 1st round. I was convinced. Everyone argued about how we should have taken a DE but look at what Carter has accomplished. Anyways, I am hoping to see someone write up something after the super bowl Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 I agree he is a player to watch, but I think that we will be good as far as MLB with Fletch for a couple more years and then Blades. I was thinking maybe a future replacement for MW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris0894 Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 i've noticed a lot of mock drafts have us going after Derrick Harvey in the 1st round. He's the DE out of FLorida Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Ok last year someone wrote up an EXCELLENT Piece on WHY the skins should draft LaRon Landry in the 1st round. I was convinced. Everyone argued about how we should have taken a DE but look at what Carter has accomplished. Anyways, I am hoping to see someone write up something after the super bowl Thanks This isn't exactly a long piece, but I think that DE does need to be addressed. Daniels is near the end of his career and Evans is a decent backup, but still just a backup. Chris Wilson has shown flashes but he is the size of a linebacker (240) and is mostly just useful on passing downs. A guy like Gholston who is 6-4 264 is someone who is more capable of being an every down DE who can do serious damage in the backfield as well as stop the run which is what we need. If not a DE I'd like a big bodied, talented WR. There aren't any Calvin Johnsons in this class but there is definitely talent. That means we can pick up a potentially great WR at our draft spot without breaking the bank. Malcolm Kelly, Adarius Bowman, Limas Sweed, James Hardy. All big, strong WRs which we could really use, IMO. A couple of those guys we might even be able to pick up in the 2nd round, depending on their combines. Again, I think a lot of it depends on the moves we make in FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 The sexy positions often take time to develop? Are redskins fan that patient to wait? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.