Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Simeon Rice Released (merged x 4 - stop starting Simeon Rice threads people)

skins84

By skins84
in The Stadium

Who Should The Redskins Play In The Superbowl?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Should The Redskins Play In The Superbowl?

    • New England
      22
    • Baltimore
      25
    • Indianapolis
      9
    • San Diego
      15

Recommended Posts

DOOG

DOOG

Posted
Posted
Warning.

The following link contains language not suitable for minors & maybe offensive to others. If colorful language isn't for you, don't click the link. However, the link IS intended to express the thoughts of at least 90% of everyone that has already clicked on this thread. :)

http://members.shaw.ca/rlongpre01/moon_tiny.jpg

:laugh: :laugh: do you make these things or just find them on the internets?:logo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zCommander

zCommander

Posted
Posted
Warning.

The following link contains language not suitable for minors & maybe offensive to others. If colorful language isn't for you, don't click the link. However, the link IS intended to express the thoughts of at least 90% of everyone that has already clicked on this thread. :)

http://members.shaw.ca/rlongpre01/moon_tiny.jpg

:doh: :doh: :doh: This is coming from the coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zCommander

zCommander

Posted
Posted
Warning.

The following link contains language not suitable for minors & maybe offensive to others. If colorful language isn't for you, don't click the link. However, the link IS intended to express the thoughts of at least 90% of everyone that has already clicked on this thread. :)

http://members.shaw.ca/rlongpre01/moon_tiny.jpg

:doh: :doh: :doh: This is coming from the coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jnhay

jnhay

Posted
Posted
Your right we could not use 29 sacks in a 4 year period, thats just to many for 1 player, how many guys on our roster have 29 sacks in their whole career....:doh:

I guess the guy doesn't realize Junior Seau is 38 years old. I think Strahan is 35 or 36 too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Morneblade

Morneblade

Posted
Posted

ESPN reported hat Rice had a phyiscal that include MRI's and was much more in depth that the one he got with the Bucs. Which was confined to manipulating his shoulder.

And was passed to play football.

Rice was reported to turn down a 2.5 million dollar pay cut, and sited that as for his real reason for the release.

So, now that he has passed a physical, do we take a closer look at him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Morneblade

Morneblade

Posted
Posted

I'd take a look at him. Going over his 12 year career and Daneils 12 year career there isnt much comparison.

Daneils over the past 3 years had 4, 48 and 37 tackles, including assists.

Rice over the past 3 years had 40, 40, and 18 tackles, including assists. In the years with low tackle stats, they were hurt at least 1/2 the year.

Rice has aprox. 50 MORE tackles over his career than Daneils. Rice-382, Daneils-335

The Sack comparison is no contest of course. Rice has 121.5, Daneils has 56. Daneils has 12 sacks over the last 3 seasons including 4 in one game. Rice had 12 and 14 sacks before the shoulder injury last year, in which he put up 2 sacks.

But the fact that Rice puts up run-stopping stats that are at LEAST comprable to Daneils should be an eye-opener to some. It was to me. That and Rice had less assists than Daneils (more solo tackles). Now, I dont think that people are gonna call Rice a run stuffing specialist, but he may not be the liablity at the run game that some think he is.

Rice has been in 10 more games that Daneils over that same 12 year career however. Rice hyas only missed time in 3 NFL seasons, 2 of those being only 1 game. Daneils has missed time in 5 NFL seasons. 1 game once, 2 games once, 3 games (2x) and 11 games his first year here. So, Rice has been healty over his carrier, missing 2 games in 11 seasons untill last year.

Rice also creates tunovers, creating 6 turnovers 3 times with 35 over his career. Daniels has 3 as his highest total, and 11 for his career.

Daneils is slated to make about 3.2 million this year, with insentives. Rice was slated to make 4 million before being cut. I'd take him at 4 million over 3.2 million anyday

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thinking Skins

Thinking Skins

Posted
Posted
I'd take a look at him. Going over his 12 year career and Daneils 12 year career there isnt much comparison.

Daneils over the past 3 years had 4, 48 and 37 tackles, including assists.

Rice over the past 3 years had 40, 40, and 18 tackles, including assists. In the years with low tackle stats, they were hurt at least 1/2 the year.

Rice has aprox. 50 MORE tackles over his career than Daneils. Rice-382, Daneils-335

The Sack comparison is no contest of course. Rice has 121.5, Daneils has 56. Daneils has 12 sacks over the last 3 seasons including 4 in one game. Rice had 12 and 14 sacks before the shoulder injury last year, in which he put up 2 sacks.

But the fact that Rice puts up run-stopping stats that are at LEAST comprable to Daneils should be an eye-opener to some. It was to me. That and Rice had less assists than Daneils (more solo tackles). Now, I dont think that people are gonna call Rice a run stuffing specialist, but he may not be the liablity at the run game that some think he is.

Rice has been in 10 more games that Daneils over that same 12 year career however. Rice hyas only missed time in 3 NFL seasons, 2 of those being only 1 game. Daneils has missed time in 5 NFL seasons. 1 game once, 2 games once, 3 games (2x) and 11 games his first year here. So, Rice has been healty over his carrier, missing 2 games in 11 seasons untill last year.

Rice also creates tunovers, creating 6 turnovers 3 times with 35 over his career. Daniels has 3 as his highest total, and 11 for his career.

Daneils is slated to make about 3.2 million this year, with insentives. Rice was slated to make 4 million before being cut. I'd take him at 4 million over 3.2 million anyday

Interesting comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...