Chris Worthy Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Who is his Agent? Edit: its Alonzo Shavers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrell1106 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 By tomorrow. I will give then Springs and the 6 for their two number 's and Samuel. I would take that and run. A corner of that quality is hard to come by but he'll want too much money.:2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 I just hope we're able to sign Cooley. If so, I want this guy. Then I seriously want us to draft Jamaal Anderson, Gaines Adams, or Laron Landry right away. Anderson or Adams would give our defense some potential greatness, whereas Landry could complete a fairly frightening secondary. Just imagine, if our WR core met up to its expectations last year, and we get a secondary of Rogers, Taylor, Landry, Samuels, Smoot, Springs, and Co. - our practices would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shedrick Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Is Samuel better than Clements if so he's going to want Clements type of money.And not to forget Drew is his agent who seem to get the money he want for his player. So let him go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan07 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 By tomorrow. I will give then Springs and the 6 for their two number 's and Samuel. done! I'd be very happy of that happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hokieskins1 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 he wants bly money not clements money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snaps Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 i wouldn mind us talking to New England as long as we dont offer them anything outrageous like the Briggs trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrell1106 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Just in case the story isn't posted here yet http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/10108712 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeGibbsThickandthin Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Just in case the story isn't posted here yethttp://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/10108712 LOL we are already in a rumor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Worthy Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 LOL we are already in a rumor. Same report from a Pats board.... http://www.patriotsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22589 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana87 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 #6, and next years 1st round pick for Samuel, #24, and #28. They get a top 6 pick and move one of their 1st round picks to next year and we get Samuel and 2 lower 1st round picks. I like it but they will not trade Samuel by the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrell1106 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 LOL we are already in a rumor. I know because I was suprised no one asked for a link, at least on the 1st page of posts. The story is also confirmed in the globe, online. Not a big Adam Shefter fan. He pulls stuff out of the air sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnhnyy Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 This goes back the same question we had. If Pats/Chicago doesn't want to pay their own pro-bowl player a guarenteed 20 million, why would they want to pay a rookie for the same amount? We are stucked at #6 unless Calvin Johnson drops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrell1106 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 #6, and next years 1st round pick for Samuel, #24, and #28. They get a top 6 pick and move one of their 1st round picks to next year and we get Samuel and 2 lower 1st round picks. I like it but they will not trade Samuel by the draft. I think I would take that assuming we do well next season. DB woul be solid but next we need to focus on a guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianforster Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 did anyone even read the article? you pretty much need 2 first rounders to even talk to them about samuels let this one pass, id love to see the guy in burgundy and gold, but we already have enough corners, and we most definitely do not have the type of money he wants. you realize he is better than clements right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stew Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Gamble next year's first for him & take Landry/Adams/Branch with the #6 pick. You could have a backfield of Landry/Taylor/Samuel/Smoot/Springs/Rodgers. Serious question. I realize the cap goes up next year, but could we have all that under one salary cap??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsManNJ Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 I say trade Springs and next year's first for Samuel. I concur we need our 6th pick this year to get CJ if we really go after him. Ill definately take Asante just to make sure no one in the NFC East gets him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCdangerous Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 So CB Samuel is trying to be traded? There is no way for the Redskins to pull off a deal to give NE our #6 pick and we get their #24, #28, AND Samuel WITHOUT losing any current players or future picks. The only way this could happen is if Snyder gives NE cold hard cash, and that ain't allowed. The only reason NE would go up to #6 in the first place is to get LaRon Landry to succeed R. Harrison. New England is smarter than Snyder (not the Redskins, that is why they say stupid people say "Go, Gators!"). They will not throw in Samuel and their 2 first round picks if we throw in Springs AND Lloyd and #6. They need something to think that they got the upper hand. Which is why it is risky to give future 1st round picks, if we do poorly in the new two years, there goes two good rookies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted April 5, 2007 Author Share Posted April 5, 2007 I know because I was suprised no one asked for a link, at least on the 1st page of posts. The story is also confirmed in the globe, online.Not a big Adam Shefter fan. He pulls stuff out of the air sometimes. It's probably because right when I had created the thread, the story had just broke on the NFL Network. No link on tv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsManNJ Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Samuels = No Cooley Cooley won't be asking for an absurd amount. I don't think he is a money hungary player. He seems to be a loyal player. Plus next year Brunell will be gone that should give us more room to keep Cooley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted April 5, 2007 Author Share Posted April 5, 2007 did anyone even read the article? you pretty much need 2 first rounders to even talk to them about samuels let this one pass, id love to see the guy in burgundy and gold, but we already have enough corners, and we most definitely do not have the type of money he wants. you realize he is better than clements right? Not sure what the sarcasm is for, but yeah, I noticed that while reading the article. Two first rounders...yikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsManNJ Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 i have heard he wants bly type money If he wants bly type money that would be fn sweet. But that's only if we get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngloSackSon Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 First post here... First off, Rosenhaus is not Samuel's agent. Some dude named Alonzo Shavers is. This is a good thing, as he presumably does not possess the same ability to dangle Samuel in front of Snyder. Second, the Patriots will have no problem letting Samuel sit on the bench, as evidenced by the Branch case in '06. Only the Pioli and Belichick have the balls to resist potential draft picks in order to maintain complete control over their lockeroom, and any other would be malcontents that may be lurking. Third, for Springs to be involved in any trade, he and New England brass would have to agree on an extension. There is zero chance of this happening. The only way he ends up here is if the 'skins give up the six pick, and next years first altogether. Washington would then have no problems at corner, though it would have come at an unforgiveable cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fist Full of Passes Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 Let it go , dont do this one either! stupid-stupid-stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsManNJ Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 What could we offer NE besides 2 first round picks? I'd give up next years 1st and a player or 2 maybe. If he wants Bly type money he wouldn't hurt us to much on the cap. All I know is that I don't want him in the NFC East unless he is with us. NE will probably just let him sit because I don't think anyone wants to give up 2 first rounders with us being the exception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.