jpillian Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Prosecutor wants death penalty for boy's slaying POSTED: 2:23 p.m. EDT, March 21, 2007 http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/21/missing.boy.ap/index.html "SAVANNAH, Georgia (AP) -- A convicted child molester and his parents were indicted Wednesday on charges they molested and then murdered a 6-year-old neighbor boy, whose body was found last week in a trash bag dumped by a roadside. Glynn County District Attorney Stephen D. Kelley said he will seek the death penalty against George David Edenfield, 32, who has a prior child molestation conviction from 1997, and his parents, David and Peggy Edenfield. A friend of the Edenfield family, Donald Dale, was indicted on charges of concealing a body and tampering with evidence. The boy, Christopher Michael Barrios, was missing for a week before police found his body last Thursday. The body was in a black trash bag dumped near a roadside about three miles from his home on the outskirts of Brunswick, a port city in southeastern Georgia. "They deserve the worst, for them to torture my son like that, every last one of them," said Mike Barrios, Christopher's father. Authorities have not released many details about the case, including how the child was killed or how long his abductors might have kept him alive. Other charges against the Edenfields include false imprisonment, cruelty to children and enticing a child for indecent purposes. Police have described George David Edenfield as mentally slow, but not retarded and capable of understanding right from wrong. Edenfield had to register as a sex offender in Georgia. He and his parents lived across the street from Christopher's grandmother and less than 600 feet from where the kindergartner met his school bus. A Georgia law passed last year prohibits registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school bus stop. That would have barred the younger Edenfield from living so close, but a pending lawsuit prompted a federal judge last year to block that provision from taking effect. George David Edenfield pleaded guilty in 1997 to molesting two boys, ages 7 and 9. Prosecutors said he rubbed his clothed body "in a sexual manner" against the boys, who also were fully dressed. He was sentenced then to 10 years on probation. His father pleaded guilty to incest in 1994. He was accused of having sex with an adult relative; the relatives was not his son. Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed." ----------------------------- It sure would be nice if we could give child molestors more than just probation. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 In with the first expression of outrage and demand that all accused child molesters be summarily executed! Serously though, that sucks. Every parent's worst nightmare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpillian Posted March 21, 2007 Author Share Posted March 21, 2007 In with the first expression of outrage and demand that all accused child molesters be summarily executed!Serously though, that sucks. Every parent's worst nightmare. Yeah, it's just a damn shame. The authorities had identified him as a child molestor -- and convicted him of a previous offense. Still weren't able to prevent him from hurting (and killing) another child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 1) I want to know what liberal weenie gruop brought a lawsuit against implementation of that bus stop law 2) These people need to be removed from the gene pool 3) If that were my son, my life would be over, because these pieces of **** would meet a slow death, hanging upside down in my basement with jumper cables attached to their nuts. Then I'd be the one in jail, but it would have been worth it 4) May God help the family thru this ordeal. I can't even imagine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 In with the first expression of outrage and demand that all accused child molesters be summarily executed! That's right, they should be executed. Beats the probation this ******* got Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeesburgSkinFan Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 The only good thing about this is that it happened in a state that uses the death penalty. Too bad they don't use the electric chair, though...it would be good to see this whole white trash family lit up like christmas trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannonshogs44 Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Pre Heat chair 5000000 volts let bake for 20 min. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sith lord Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Somebody is gonna get them before they're even executed. I'm usually against the death penalty, but in this case, I'm making an exception. Those lousy bas%^rds can rot in hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnight Judges Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Somebody is gonna get them before they're even executed. I'm usually against the death penalty, but in this case, I'm making an exception. Those lousy bas%^rds can rot in hell. Then you are not actually against the death penalty. I don't think death penalties should be issued liberally, but this is a good example of why we have it. It could have been worse or it might be worse, right now we only know about one murder, in which case there would be absolutely no doubt in my mind, killing scum like this = justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Yeah, it's just a damn shame. The authorities had identified him as a child molestor -- and convicted him of a previous offense. Still weren't able to prevent him from hurting (and killing) another child. George David Edenfield pleaded guilty in 1997 to molesting two boys, ages 7 and 9. Prosecutors said he rubbed his clothed body "in a sexual manner" against the boys, who also were fully dressed. He was sentenced then to 10 years on probation. I suspect one reason for the light sentence was the fact that it's tough to claim "rape" when both the rapist and victim are fully clothed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 1) I want to know what liberal weenie gruop brought a lawsuit against implementation of that bus stop law Some liberal weenie group who has a problem with the government telling someone that "we've decided to put a bus stop near your house, therefore it's illegal for you to live in your own house"? 2) These people need to be removed from the gene pool Agreed. (If they're guilty.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Some liberal weenie group who has a problem with the government telling someone that "we've decided to put a bus stop near your house, therefore it's illegal for you to live in your own house"? Good way of keeping perverts on the move. I should have thought of that last summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 This story makes me very, very angry. We can only hope they are put in population in prison. Hopefully, they'll **** them up, cut their dicks off and shove them in their mouth. **** the justice system, it's the reason this boy is dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CandaceM23 Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 This whole story disgusts me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 FYI, one of problems with the "bus stop" laws (or the can't live within a mile of a school or chrch laws) rule is that such laws force our rural areas to take all the child molesters, since those are the only places where they can live legally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSmithTheReal#36 Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 This story is terrible. I'm actually down here in Bruswick and the body was found a few miles from where I'm staying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teller Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 I'm sorry, but a convicted sex offenders rights don't mean half a damn to me. I look at this like the "right" to vote. If you commit a felony, you lose that "right." You commit a sex offense, you forfeit the "right" to have easy access to kidnap, molest, torture, murder and trash bag our kids. **** your rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 I'm sorry, but a convicted sex offenders rights don't mean half a damn to me. I look at this like the "right" to vote. If you commit a felony, you lose that "right."You commit a sex offense, you forfeit the "right" to have easy access to kidnap, molest, torture, murder and trash bag our kids. **** your rights. So, you feel like pointing out exactly which poster on here has advocated people's right to rape, murder and torture? Or are you and that straw man having too much fun together? (And let's just leave aside that whole thing about changing the penalty for a crime after the crime's been committed, and carried out. I seem to remember the Constitution saying something about that.) While no one's got a problem with criminals being punished (I'm in favor of the death penalty for many cases.) I do have a problem when "child protection" laws do things like force people out of their existing homes simply because somebody moved into the house next door, or those that go from keeping pedophiles away from schools to making it illegal for them to live in the entire county. (And frankly, as a practical matter, I see a problem with kicking somebody out of prison, and then making it illegal for him to set foot anywhere, and making it impossible for him to get a job, or to rent anything, or, basically, to live. All you're doing in that case is telling him to kill himself or to go underground and adopt a false ID. (Which, in turn, makes the whole "keeping track of him" thing impossible.)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeesburgSkinFan Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Driving them to suicide isn't a bad idea... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 So, you feel like pointing out exactly which poster on here has advocated people's right to rape, murder and torture? Or are you and that straw man having too much fun together? (And let's just leave aside that whole thing about changing the penalty for a crime after the crime's been committed, and carried out. I seem to remember the Constitution saying something about that.) While no one's got a problem with criminals being punished (I'm in favor of the death penalty for many cases.) I do have a problem when "child protection" laws do things like force people out of their existing homes simply because somebody moved into the house next door, or those that go from keeping pedophiles away from schools to making it illegal for them to live in the entire county. (And frankly, as a practical matter, I see a problem with kicking somebody out of prison, and then making it illegal for him to set foot anywhere, and making it impossible for him to get a job, or to rent anything, or, basically, to live. All you're doing in that case is telling him to kill himself or to go underground and adopt a false ID. (Which, in turn, makes the whole "keeping track of him" thing impossible.)) Defense lawyer, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Defense lawyer, huh? Rational person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Rational person. Yes, letting your heart bleed for let's say a 45 year old man raping an innocent 6 year old boy is rational. :doh: If you are that worried about where these animals live maybe you can use your home as a shelter. I'm also sure that you wouldn't mind if you had one living next door to entertain your kids, neices or nephews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeesburgSkinFan Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Heard more sordid details of this case on the radio this morning. The father & son took turns sodomizing the boy while the mother watched, according to reports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Let me ask a serious question. What makes you guys more outraged about this than if the victim was an innocent adult? I'm curious to hear different views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeesburgSkinFan Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Let me ask a serious question. What makes you guys more outraged about this than if the victim was an innocent adult? I'm curious to hear different views. What makes you think people would be less outraged if this happened to an innocent adult? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.