skins4life61 Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 No it is notIf he is there at number 6 its a different ball game But the Redskins should not trade up for him Well said. If he's still there at 6 I'm all for it, but it wouldn't make sense to trade up for a WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceviker Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 id say give whatever it takes. honestly. i dont care. make it happen. "Whatever it takes" is my motto for getting CJ. Ok well, if "whatever" means our first, moss, and portis, no, then not, but if it means draft picks, yes, whatever it takes. And get rid of B-Lloyd while we're at it, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_c_19960 Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 I admit CJ is a great player but why draft a WR this year in 1st Rd when we have other holes to fill. In the 2007 NFL Draft the Redskins Select Gaines Adams! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phixius Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 There are more important needs on this team than a receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siven Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 "Whatever it takes" is my motto for getting CJ.Ok well, if "whatever" means our first, moss, and portis, no, then not, but if it means draft picks, yes, whatever it takes. And get rid of B-Lloyd while we're at it, Intelligent game plan there. Trade away all of meaningful picks next year to get 1 player, plus the 6 pick pick this year. No depth and we are shafted for a while to come. We won't get to a Superbowl that way. If we don't get to a Superbowl we are wasting the valuable time of our players. Take CJ at 6 if he is there, otherwise draft Landry or Anderson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willmb5 Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 absolutely a yes if we dont have to give up way too much to move up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 We have too many holes now that we can't afford to trade up. I would love to have CJ but we need a safety, defensive end, defensive tackle and an offensive guard before we need another WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted March 21, 2007 Author Share Posted March 21, 2007 Well it seems that the votes are pretty much solid though it will go on. Thanks for the star ratings. I'll assume that the people who voted for bad ratings were those who simply didn't like seeing a CJ thread, but oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinzelwashington Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 man. like the espn analyst said. imagine campbell at qb. cooley at TE. ladell betts and clinton at back. cj, moss and randell el. with our Oline. all chemisty happening in saunders 300 page playbook. man i woiuld move up for cj offensive player. just cuzz somehow i have confidence in fletcher that he will call the right audbiles. he will back up the weak dline. he will make this D that much better. much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOVA2Tampa Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Hell no...we need a pass-rushing DE like Gaines Adams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins247 Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 No absolutely NO!! We dont have a need for him. He may be the best player in the draft or whatever. But i just dont see us going after him. We have playmakers already and plenty of them. He would be just another rookie riding the bench. We don't have a need for him? That's absolutely a ridiculous comment. There isn't a team in the NFL that couldn't use a player like Johnson. You obviously haven't seen the guy play to make a comment like that. And you're last sentence is just ridiculous, as well. I GUARANTEE you this guy wouldn't ride the bench no matter WHERE he ends up! And save the "we don't need him, we need defense" thing. Yeah, I get it, our defense needs improvement. No kidding. But I also know a player like Calvin Johnson doesn't come along very often. And if he falls to us, we take him, no matter what are needs are. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punishmentcrew Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 It's VERY tempting, but I don't think it's wise. If we did that though, we could part ways with Patten and Lloyd in my opinion and have a corps of Moss, CJ, Randle-El, Thrash, and Espy. I do think it's possible that CJ could put us over the top the way Colston put NO over the top! Not that I am for drafting CJ over a DL or DE. But, we would pretty much certainly have to part ways with Patten and Lloyd just to be able to afford him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilsburypgh Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 CJ outstanding id be super happy to have that guy on this team, Big and Physical, oh yea that means run blocking as well, that would be nice. And what a dangerous deep threat he is. Hes gonna get all the attention in the red zone and thats where our little smurf WRs come in to play. We already dont have much picks and our Defense has no pass rushers, so drafting DE really wont make much of an impact that draftin CJ would on this offense. Its like this, if we draft a DE or DT, id still be HOPING that we will improve on Defense!!! But if we draft CJ, oh i know we gonna be dangerous on offense.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilsburypgh Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Foprget CJ ... its hopeless ... get used to the fact that the Skins will have to defend against him for the next 10 years. oh i forgot about that!!! Oh we better trade up and get him before the Cowboys get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilsburypgh Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 Have some more kool aid. Even in 2005, which was the best season of his career, Moss wasn't the #1 game breaking wide receiver (perhaps you've seen highlights of a similarly built guy playing for Carolina by the name of "Steve Smith"). Yes he's great...and a true #1 when healthy, but hell, if you can have two #1 caliber wide receivers why not do it. But the cost to go up in the draft is just too much when we have so much other need. Pick him at 6, pass on drafting up. Thank u!! Moss is nothing but a good #2 WR, he had one outstanding year and now hes back to his normal self. Really look at Santanas stats, what he did this past year is his normal output his whole career except '05. He is short and quick and he is a dangerous deep threat, who else do we have other than ARE who is nothin more than a slot WR. And again another short WR, that probably is no help in our run support. I kinda feel sorry for the Redskin Qbs sometimes, to drop back and cant find your little WRs because their so short and u have no big tower to turn to.. I mean what do u do then?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleedburgundyandgold Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 CJ Craig? as in the fake white house press secretary/chief of staff on the west wing? nah. we dont need her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs!We!Trust! Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Yeah we better get him before Cowgirl, Feagles, Giants, get him. Could you imagine a T.O./Randy Moss player with out the headache. Its is a no brainer for me. We can stretch the field which will open up running lanes. Remember what happen when Jason Campbell start throwing bombs,defense had to worry about the pass. With CJ the Roy (I get burn alot)Williams can't sneak up with out a 6'5 230lb WR that can run a 4.35 get pass him. It will be awesome!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsenic Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 This makes no sense as we are already set at WR, and really have nothing we can afford to lose to trade up with. What about Springs? Lloyd? Detroit may want Springs.. ya never know. Theyre only dropping a few spots. I have a feeling these 2 players are on their way out of Redskins Park for not being team players AKA Redskins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs!We!Trust! Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 You right if we package our first and Springs to move up and get the 2nd pick, hopefully they throw in a 3rd rounder pick. That would be the only way I make that trade. :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReefa Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Depends on the price. I can't imagine saying yes or no without knowing what it would cost the team. It would be tough to do with only the one 1st day pick this year - we would probably have to give away a pick from next year's draft. This year's 1 and next year's 1? No, too much. This year's 1 and next year's 2? I'm thinking about it. This year's 1 and next year's 3, as well as a 2nd day pick next season? Definately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoBob Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 For anyone answering yes, you have to provide details on what you are willing to give up to get him, without that, this discussion is meaningless.... The only trade bait we've talked about currently is Springs, and right now that doesn't seem like a great option if you look at our CB situation. If we could lowball an offer to Detroit at #3….and they are willing to accept poor "value" (ie our #6 and some day 2 picks this year and next) than I'm fine…. But any of these are deal breakers for me: Trading Springs Trading Next Years #1 Trading Next Years #2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuryYourDuke Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Not worth it. Why do we need another good receiver for Campbell to one hop the ball to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Mortgage the freakin farm ... but get him! With CJ the Skins will instantly become a media FAVORITE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hokieskins1 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 i would say our first and lloyd and MAYBE next years 3rd if they would not do the first thing i mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#21Taylor4Ever Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 No absolutely NO!! We dont have a need for him. He may be the best player in the draft or whatever. But i just dont see us going after him. We have playmakers already and plenty of them. He would be just another rookie riding the bench. Name our #2 WR - ______ _______ As for CJ EVER riding the pine, you must be kidding. Calvin Johnson will make the same impact as Randy Moss did in his rookie year, only CJ will do it minus the tude and nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.