Genghis Khan Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Adam Shefter reports that the broncos want betts for bly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redman Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'd go for Betts for Bly . . . and a second rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjunkies Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'd do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parlett316 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Adam Schefter is a Broncos stooge. Tell him to take that trade and shove it up his ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsOrlando Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'd go for Betts for Bly . . . and a second rounder. Ding ding ding, this is the winning scenario or they could give us our third round pick back?:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveStrongSkins Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I dont like that trade one bit. How about we keep Springs and keep RB a strength for us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Washington Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'd go for Betts for Bly . . . and a second rounder. THEIR second round.... Betts would be a pro bowler in Denver. Seriously, I wouldn't make that move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackest Eyes Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Ding ding ding, this is the winning scenario or they could give us our third round pick back?:doh: lol a second round would be fantastic though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 We got Smoot. we don't need bly. we need betts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackOps Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Great for us, but the Broncos just signed Henry to a 5-year deal. Not gonna happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'd go for Betts for Bly . . . and a second rounder. Beat me to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDSKINZ-RIDEORDIE Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Adam Schefter is a Broncos stooge. Tell him to take that trade and shove it up his ass. Cosign, F-him, Betts is ours, and if they want him, they better send Bly along with and at least a high second round draft pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjinhan Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 dude i mean if we are just talking about player for player maybe... but if you think about salary cap... we wont find any as good as Betts for Portis' backup anywhere near the money we are paying Betts... For the money that we need to pay Bly we could have just easily have gotten Clements by paying Clements the same money while he was a FA. If we REALLY REALLY need to get a great CB... we should just wait until next year and pay up for one thats in FA instead of trading Betts away THEN paying the same money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClintonINFORSIX26 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Show us the money then give us some serious picks then we will talk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuckDallas81 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 no way alot of people think it would be ok to trade Betts but in reality that would hurt our offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 we just resigned ade jimoh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'd go for Betts for Bly . . . and a second rounder. Co-sign! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Day Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This would be an interesting deal, we could keep springs, bly, smoot, and cr plus keep our 6th for a stud DE. Our d would be deep at all positions and very good. If we could get our 3rd back (so we can replace Betts) I would do this in a heartbeat. We would also still have our #6 to trade to another team on D day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This is really strange. I don't understand this move at all. I say no way!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Punani Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 The Redskins have the bargaining leverage here not the Broncos. They are the ones who failed to do the research on a player's desire to play for them before they traded for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parlett316 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 "Adam Schefter has always been a false rumor mongerer with respect to the Raiders and anti-Raider based upon his relationship with Denver and Mike Shanahan. No decisions have been made relative to the 2007 Oakland Raiders nor will they be made for some time. Adam Schefter could not have gotten his information from a reliable source because there is only one reliable source and he doesn't trust Adam." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveStrongSkins Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This would be an interesting deal, we could keep springs, bly, smoot, and cr plus keep our 6th for a stud DE. Our d would be deep at all positions and very good. If we could get our 3rd back (so we can replace Betts) I would do this in a heartbeat. We would also still have our #6 to trade to another team on D day. Now which one of those guys do you honestly think would be happy being the 3rd or 4th corner? If Bly comes here then say bye bye to Springs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redman Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Cosign, F-him, Betts is ours, and if they want him, they better send Bly along with and at least a high second round draft pick. In all seriousness, it's not been reported on this way but Thomas Jones just was traded for what amounted to a third rounder if you use the pick value calculcator to evaluate the Bears' trade-up in the 2nd round. We're dreaming if we think we're going to get Bly and a pick for Betts. It's a buyer's market for RB's right now (but oddly enough, not for LG's! :laugh: ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 THEIR second round.... Betts would be a pro bowler in Denver. Seriously, I wouldn't make that move. What makes you think that Betts would be a pro-bowler anywhere? He's had one good year and one year that he's been healthy all 16 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_c_19960 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Oh now thats another story if they want betts instead of Springs we need to have two feature running backs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.