Lavarleap56 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 http://forums.scout.com/mb.aspx?S=71#S=71&F=1348&T=190036 Theres the link and everything neccessary to keep everyone happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGift Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoBoCTiberius Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 So, am I just out of the loop, or do people actually think Scouts.com is a reliable site? Cause, it looks pretty nutso to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Om Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 LL, I think maybe you didn't quite catch the vibe of that other one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavarleap56 Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 LL, I think maybe you didn't quite catch the vibe of that other one. I couldnt resist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teller Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Vibe = Only Om is allowed to post fake signing stories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xameil Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I find the funniest thing about it...he links a post from another fan from another board... :doh: not even a news article...a post :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: yup that will keep me entertained all day :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DOOG Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 JLC should be checking out that board..some good info over there! :logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LloydBraun Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 In all fairness to the other board, I noticed the guy only has 5 posts and another post "rumor" about Lavar coming back and it being a done deal. He's probably a troll and definately a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Gut Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 :laugh: there's no excuse for stupidity like that, not even if it runs in the family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Its not an exact science to post something credible. It takes more than the 20-200 vision, kinee jerk reaction to a post elsewhere and desire to be first with the latest without researching as we see with this one. Besides even the casual Redskin Fan should know off the bat that the odds of us trading for a Randy Moss in 2007 is Slim and none and Slim is on vacation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sith lord Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I would rather have Joe Horn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojobo Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 doesn't he have one of the highest contracts in the nfl? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzzah Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I would rather have Joe Horn. True, but when it comes to it, I'd rather not have either of them. We got 3 receivers that are being paid well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan07 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 That's OK! I'll pass! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBass1724 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 BL, 3rd next year, 5th this year for Randy Moss? Throw in AA and you got a deal! lol @ linking another message board. Wouldn't really mind if it were true though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDSKNfaithfull Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I heard we were interested in Taylor Jacobs Word is we will trade #6 for Walt Harris and Taylor Jacobs :doh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavarleap56 Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 I find the funniest thing about it...he links a post from another fan from another board... :doh: not even a news article...a post :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: yup that will keep me entertained all day :laugh: :laugh: I hope everyone knows this is a joke to kind of ease the tension the board had yesterday with all the smoot stuff. I thought it was funny but it does have a link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGSKINS Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I'm sorry but I like this if this true. When randy wants to play he is a beast. We need a big WR. I think this can work. However I would consult some of the vets on the team and see how they feel before I pull the trigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavarleap56 Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 I'm sorry but I like this if this true. When randy wants to play he is a beast. We need a big WR. I think this can work. However I would consult some of the vets on the team and see how they feel before I pull the trigger. it is very not true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDSKINZ-RIDEORDIE Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 That's OK! I'll pass! What he said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 this linked blog is ridiculous on its face. first of all the Redskins can't simply trade Brandon Lloyd to the Raiders. there are significant cap implication to making any such move. second, Moss is 32 and has had a history of problems in getting along with his coaches and in Oakland he has been critical of the HC in the newspapers. isn't that just what the Redskins were trying to avoid in letting Arrington leave town in 2006? the last thing Gibbs wants is to bring in another head case to manage. lastly, the Redskins are not going to draft Calvin Johnson, that is unless it is to turn around and trade him to another team that is desperate to have him. the Redskins defensive line is a patchwork quilt of age and inexperience. this line produced 12 sacks last year, a laughable figure in today's NFL where pressure defenses are the norm. wasn't this the same blog site that proposed that the Skins were going to sign Arrington? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CM916 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 He'd make a good replacement for Patten as a well paid bench warmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldBFree76 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I mean there's a possibility of them talking to the Raiders about Moss, but it depends on how serious these talks are. There's a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinisterJay Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 eh not interested in Randy Moss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.