SkinsFreak4-Life Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Living in the carolinas all we hear is steve smith this and steve smith that!!! and just last week here at work I was talking about Santana Moss and these two prick salesman said"hell the only thing that makes him worth talking about is he wears the same number as Steve Smith".....Soooo I went on to tell them that steve smith is not a pimple on santana's as*....What do you guys think?? am I wrong.... :gaintsuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Hell yeah, kid had an awesome game for USC. 11 receptions for 186 yards and 2 TD's! Oh.. Sorry wrong Steve Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenaa Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Come on guys. Steve Smith is a great reciever. Let's try to see clearly through the burgandy and gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir L Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Come on guys their both great recievers Santana is a baby Steve Smith They both are simular Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morneblade Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Living in the carolinas all we hear is steve smith this and steve smith that!!! and just last week here at work I was talking about Santana Moss and these two prick salesman said"hell the only thing that makes him worth talking about is he wears the same number as Steve Smith".....Soooo I went on to tell them that steve smith is not a pimple on santana's as*....What do you guys think?? am I wrong.... :gaintsuck Hell no! SS is a great Wideout, but so is Moss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir L Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Steve Smith in my opinion has better hands. Santana has better speed. Did you see Steve Smith extend himself on that one handed catch yesterday? They both are great though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins Diehard Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I think they both are pretty good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
box8276 Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I would say equal in size, numbers and importance to their teams. 1 and 2 last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsngibbs4life Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 they are similar recievers. Both great. However, I think steve smith is a little bit better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I would say equal in size, numbers and importance to their teams. 1 and 2 last year. that's what I think too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhutanibeast Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 they are both damn good and i would be happy to have either one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir L Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I think Santana is a little more clutch. We seen him come through in 2 big wins. Last play and big plays. I think our Miami players are amazing. Rumph is even stepping it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Their almost identical players. the only difference is, Smith is more consistant. He always has like 8-10 catches, for about 60-80 yards. Moss doesn't always put up huge numbers (although for the first two weeks, that wasn't his fault as much as it was Brunell's getting used to the playbook.) But, when Moss gets huge, he gets REALLY huge. Last year, agains the Giants. The comeback against the Pukes. The Chiefs couldn't cover him to save their lives. and this year, against the jags. Smith has consistant games, but not many games of his stick out. Moss has several of those memorable games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DC_FEELS_ME Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 moss >>> smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 ]']Their almost identical players.the only difference is' date=' Smith is more consistant. He always has like 8-10 catches, for about 60-80 yards. Moss doesn't always put up huge numbers (although for the first two weeks, that wasn't his fault as much as it was Brunell's getting used to the playbook.) But, when Moss gets huge, he gets REALLY huge. Last year, agains the Giants. The comeback against the Pukes. The Chiefs couldn't cover him to save their lives. and this year, against the jags. Smith has consistant games, but not many games of his stick out. Moss has several of those memorable games.[/quote'] Probably the fairest assessment. They are both equal, but different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir L Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 ]']Their almost identical players.the only difference is' date=' Smith is more consistant. He always has like 8-10 catches, for about 60-80 yards. Moss doesn't always put up huge numbers (although for the first two weeks, that wasn't his fault as much as it was Brunell's getting used to the playbook.) But, when Moss gets huge, he gets REALLY huge. Last year, agains the Giants. The comeback against the Pukes. The Chiefs couldn't cover him to save their lives. and this year, against the jags. Smith has consistant games, but not many games of his stick out. Moss has several of those memorable games.[/quote'] Yeah smith can be 100 catch 1600 yard guy Moss is an 70-80 catch 1600 yard guy He just makes the big plays. He has off games some times but that can be blamed on our QB. Eitherway though they are both great and I think would be simular if they switched places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Both are great WR, top 5 easy Moss is less of a self promoter than double S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir L Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Steve Smith is pretty quiet himself too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk Diggler Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Let's not go overboard. They are both great receivers. Things is, Steve Smith has been incendiary in the playoffs while Moss has merely been solid. So I'd give SS a slight edge over Santana as things currently stand. But knock on wood, Moss has been much more durable the past 3 seasons. Can't go wrong with either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico926 Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Come on guys their both great recieversSantana is a baby Steve Smith They both are simular Actually Steve Smith is a baby Santana as Santana is slightly taller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir L Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Can someone post career stats or stats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Living in the carolinas all we hear is steve smith this and steve smith that!!! and just last week here at work I was talking about Santana Moss and these two prick salesman said"hell the only thing that makes him worth talking about is he wears the same number as Steve Smith".....Soooo I went on to tell them that steve smith is not a pimple on santana's as*....What do you guys think?? am I wrong.... :gaintsuck You're wrong. Steve Smith is a great receiver, but that doesn't mean Santana isn't great as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggoReincarnated Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 We'll find out whos better on November 26. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vacanechaser Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 i think they are pretty even... both are great.... however, it seems that SM would have to have 200 yards and 5 touchdowns to to get the respect... all i herd yesterday was how great jacksonville is.... so there is nothing new there to me... the skins never seem to get the respect.... :gaintsuck :dallasuck :eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cscmtp Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Steve Smith and Santana Moss are, BY FAR, my 2 favorite WRs in the NFL. Both are small in size, but HUGE on the field. Great speed, great hands, tough as nails, and both just have a great desire to WIN. I own both in the majority of my dynasty fantasy football leagues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.