Lombardi's_kid_brother Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 This seems like an odd direction to go for a player who I've always felt was over-rated. But with Clark unsigned and Taylor's future uncertain, it makes some sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPstretch Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 that does make sense. who knows what will happen with sean, so this is a good idea incase he doesnt get off and can't play next year. god that would be terrible. :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbop1950 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 I prefer to bring Clark back and pass on Archuleta. Rather spend the money elsewhere. I agree. We need a pass rusher. DE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmw2301 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Archuleta is good,but I still think we need Ryan Clark as well, he would be a good nickel back if needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carter23 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 I prefer to bring Clark back and pass on Archuleta. Rather spend the money elsewhere. agreed.. i'd rather have clark than archuletta, but maybe its my burgundy and gold colored glasses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorPickSix Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 I want Clark back. If we can get both, sweet. If not, just give me Clark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Archuleta might lead the team in sacks before its all said and done... I need to experiment with this on Madden.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Just a few years ago Archuleta was considered one of the NFC's top Safeties. When Lovie Smith left the Rams D they collectively turned to ****. I think Archuleta could thrive in our aggressive type of D. Remember GW likes to use a lot of different sets including 3 Safeties so we could be signing both Clark and Archuleta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 You got to have faithYou got to have faith In the front office. ND...tell me you're not channeling a George Michael lyric on purpose :laugh: I don't know if I could integrate that to the topic: I like it, and I agree we'd still keep Clark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins005 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 I see Archuleta as an insurance policy incase either Taylor or Clark won't be here. Safeties are the last line of defense and we need a player with experience back there. :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hailskinz1991 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 i think we can spend money else where and see a better return on investment, is it me or does it seem like their is a BOUNTY of DE and DL's out there!!! :helmet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Kenzo Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 I would love to have Archuleta wearing the burgundy and gold. But if we pass on him and re-sign Clark, I think we will do just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
talk show host Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 I would love to have Archuleta wearing the burgundy and gold. But if we pass on him and re-sign Clark, I think we will do just fine. I think the idea is to resign clark AND sign archuleta. We're letting Bowen go, so archuleta is really just filling his spot. I also think we'll let Preleau or Stoutmire go, as well. This year we definately need 5CBs and only 4 safties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.