Seabee1973 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Who was he throwing it to? i thought it was cooley but someone else said Jacobs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loxley Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Redskins.com says he was intending to throw it to Jacobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santanamoss89 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 The announcers said Jacobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hail2skins Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Was Jacobs. Although the defender made a nice play, wasn't the best throw in the world for Marc to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stratosphere Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 6 inches higher and Jacobs woulda had it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green4life Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 It was a throw to Jacobs, the slacker who does not know how to hustle. Yes, Brunnel did not throw the best pass (but was trying to make a play on third down). Jacobs did not even fight for the ball. The least he could have done was try to bat the ball down to prevent the int. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Anything remotely around or directed to Tyler Jenkins has failure imprinted upon it. The man is completely useless as a WideReceiver in the NFL. I'm sure he'd make a great waiter at IHOP. Nice win tonight. Offense was anemic. Defense was superb. We need some WR help. Thrash helped some. Thanks James. You, sir, are a true Redskin. Hail Skins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan133 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 it was that guy called jacobs that for some reason people think he can be a reciever, when all season he has dropped the ball and put in no effort Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oriolesfan93p Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Brunell's pass was in the only place that Jacobs could have caught it, but it was a bad decision to make it, Brunell was trying to make something happen when there was nothing there. He should have just thrown it away and let them punt but he wanted to take some preasure off the defense but instead did just the opposite, on the other side the defender made a fantastic play, he tipped it out of Jacobs hands and then caught it. Jacobs mistake was not getting possition on the defender, if he was in front the pass is complete for a first down, that comes with experience that he just doesn't have yet, Patten had that experience and that is what he brought to the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 jacobs.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hail2thegibb Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 It wasn't even fair. I mean it's the first time he throws it in his direction in 5 games and the kid didn't even have a chance. The defender was right in front of him. The ball should have never been thrown. It's typical that some people would blame Jacobs when it wasn't even his fault. Why don't you blame the guy that threw for 25 yards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 It was a throw to Jacobs, the slacker who does not know how to hustle. Yes, Brunnel did not throw the best pass (but was trying to make a play on third down). Jacobs did not even fight for the ball. The least he could have done was try to bat the ball down to prevent the int. you'rre not the only one who saw that. jacobs actually had his hand on it and the defender moved it and took it from him. still, the big bad on mark, but jacobs had a chance to make a good play and also blew it, imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 How many times are we going to hear this excuse of blaming Brunell.....I've seen Cooley, Portis, Thrash, Moss, Sellars and others catch some difficult balls. I have never - ever - seen Jenkins catch anything remotely challenging. The man has hands made of AstroGlide. Excuses, chances and opportunities are done. The man is football challenged. Go Skins - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 How many times are we going to hear this excuse of blaming Brunell.....I've seen Cooley, Portis, Thrash, Moss, Sellars and others catch some difficult balls.I have never - ever - seen Jenkins catch anything remotely challenging. The man has hands made of AstroGlide. Excuses, chances and opportunities are done. The man is football challenged. Go Skins - First off, unless you're making some joke I don't get, his name is Taylor Jacobs. Second, I agree that he's overrated by a lot of fans. Third, people will blame Mark Brunell because they should. The protection was frequently poor, but he made a number of bad decisions and was off target on several throws. Is he our best chance at quarterback? Maybe so. Is he or should he be completely free of blame? Definitely not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadMonkey Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 6 inches higher and Jacobs woulda had it..... Height had nothing to do with the int considering Jacobs was taller than the DB covering him, all he had to do was cut his route short and run towards Brunell instead of just standing there.... considering he was atleast 10yds past the 1st down marker..... because he didn't do that it allowed the db to make a good play on the ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Perhaps there is a chance that Jenkins just does not understand his role? Rumor has it he is unstoppable in practice. Maybe he is only able to peak Tuesday thru Friday? Maybe the weekends are just not his forte'. Someone should change his calendar and see what happens - can't be worse. Unless he breaks out against the SeaChickens - the man will be selling me a beer at FedEx next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinFan63 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Was Jacobs. Although the defender made a nice play, wasn't the best throw in the world for Marc to make. Wasn't a throw he should have made at all. He looked down right pathetic today. Hail!:point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Height had nothing to do with the int considering Jacobs was taller than the DB covering him, all he had to do was cut his route short and run towards Brunell instead of just standing there.... considering he was atleast 10yds past the 1st down marker..... because he didn't do that it allowed the db to make a good play on the ball i feel good reading these posts. i thought when i saw that pass, "oh no mark", then i saw jacobs was right where the ball was going, it was all in a couple of seconds, but i thought "it's to him, he's gonna get it". TJ actually had his hand(s) on it first and then i saw the db take it away. i thought "that's more on tj than mark, although you never should throw that kinda ball--until you make it--then its a "clutch play" of course. but with all the lurking and not-so-lurking still-brunell-venom, i figured no one else would see TJ's part in this and i'd get flamed. said it all anyway though :laugh: of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Jason La Canfora ineptly labels the INT as easy for Brian Kelly in his Post article. Actually it was done one handed and was a nice play on Kelly's part albeit a bad throw on Brunell's part. Watch the replay. Cooley was just turning upfield past his two defenders. If Brunell lobs it to him downfield over the defenders, instead of trying to hit Jacobs, it's a long completion for a first down and possibly a TD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbuzz1962 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Hey everyone, give it up. We won!!! Give them a break. Brunell will be the first one to admit he shouldn't have thrown the ball. He was frustrated, just trying to make a play. It is always a dangerous throw to go across the field deep in their territory. We were lucky, and the defense held. It's over, enjoy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dockeryfan Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Perhaps there is a chance that Jenkins just does not understand his role? Rumor has it he is unstoppable in practice. Maybe he is only able to peak Tuesday thru Friday? Maybe the weekends are just not his forte'. Someone should change his calendar and see what happens - can't be worse. Unless he breaks out against the SeaChickens - the man will be selling me a beer at FedEx next year. I get it. You changed his name to Tyler Jenkins. That's hilarious!!!!!!!!!! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Perhaps if he would consider sucking less - I'd bother to learn his name. This has been ongoing since the onset of the season w/ Jenkins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabee1973 Posted January 8, 2006 Author Share Posted January 8, 2006 Thanks for the quick responses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sisko Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 The two are not mutually exclusive. Brunell made a risky/poor decision on that pass but it had a good chance of being completed if Jacobs comes back for the ball. We need to bring in another WR and drop Jacobs lower on the depth chart...he does do a good job playing special teams after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedKi11s Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 seemed like jacobs just wanted to make it to the nfl, collect his $$$$$, and get the hell out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.