themurf Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 If Laveranues Coles hauls in 11 catches for 634 yards and four touchdowns this weekend against the Buffalo Bills and Santana Moss sits out the Eagles game then both players will finish with identical numbers - 80 catches, 1,400 yards and nine TDs. Just thought I'd share. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Chaos47 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 but coles is a much better fit for what the jets want to do! (lose) :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegionOfDoom Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. Sounds like the people on Gang green.....they are fools who believe that Latoe is a better reciever....in spite of Moss having a career year.....they like tough recievers who gain zero yac across the middle who get smacked every time he touches the ball....:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redphoenix Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. So his name should be Santana McMoss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Chaos47 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 So his name should be Santana McMoss. Forgive me, I'm not following... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveStrongSkins Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 but coles is a much better fit for what the jets want to do! (lose) :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: I've never understood that logic that Jets fan's use. Ok we'll take the less agile, un-productive wideout because he fits our scheme better. Riiiiight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gridironmike Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. :laugh: OK. I'm sure that if LC had made the plays that Moss has made, he would've been quiet as a mouse during the offseason and he'd still be a Redskin. Lucky? How about opportunistic? He has made the MOST out of his opporunity here. Coles produced big numbers, but they didn't always impact the W's the way Moss' number have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themurf Posted December 27, 2005 Author Share Posted December 27, 2005 :laugh: OK. I'm sure that if LC had made the plays that Moss has made, he would've been quiet as a mouse during the offseason and he'd still be a Redskin. Lucky? How about opportunistic? He has made the MOST out of his opporunity here. Coles produced big numbers, but they didn't always impact the W's the way Moss' number have. Santana Moss is a playmaker - Coles isn't. It's that simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgun88 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. :laugh: I needed a good laugh thanks man.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntotoro Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Forgive me, I'm not following... That's ok. No one is quite following your reasons for saying Moss has been lucky, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jrew1223 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 :laugh: I needed a good laugh thanks man.... :stupid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donita35 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. Is this a joke. :mad: I guess beating the same player twice on the same play, in the same game is pure luck. If so, you should really have your head examined. I am not sure that you can get 1,400 yards in the NFL on pure luck. You should really let the animosity and hate go because all it is doing is making you look stupid. :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Platypus Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 If Laveranues Coles hauls in 11 catches for 634 yards and four touchdowns... ROFL!! Good one. Is this a joke. :mad: I guess beating the same player twice on the same play, in the same game is pure luck. If so, you should really have your head examined. I am not sure that you can get 1,400 yards in the NFL on pure luck. You should really let the animosity and hate go because all it is doing is making you look stupid. :mad: You're not serious are you? Clearly he was being sarcastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Worthy Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. Your joking right?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donita35 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Forgive me, I'm not following... Neither am I . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Platypus Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 For "F"s sake. HE WAS JOKING!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiger-bailey Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 I was pissed when we traded Coles for Moss. IMO, Coles has more ability. But, looking back I was wrong. Moss is a team player and Coles has no heart and is selfish. We got the better end of the deal.:eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Guys, Captain Chaos is just mocking what Jets fans say on www.theganggreen.com They say Coles is the better WR because he makes plays on his own over the middle while Moss only catches the ball downfield and scores on lucky screen passes It is a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo Montoya Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 The toe couldnt turn a screen pay into a 2yd gain! I literally hugged my TV on the 3rd Moss TD this weekend!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cycopath Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 If Laveranues Coles hauls in 11 catches for 634 yards and four touchdowns this weekend against the Buffalo Bills and Santana Moss sits out the Eagles game then both players will finish with identical numbers - 80 catches, 1,400 yards and nine TDs. Just thought I'd share. It could happen.... oh wait, we are talking about coles, nevermind. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fnkdctr(007) Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Who got cut in college. HMMMMMMMMMMM. Seems some college coaches know what the real dillards deal is. Although I thought I used to love LC. I now know what true love is? Moss is unreal and was last year in da (playoffs). Unlike can't get to the playoffs LC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor ToughLove Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Moss Probowled - Coles did not. The probowls speak for themselves. And soon the playoffs will speak for themselves too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tabularasa Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. That had to be sarcasm. It is EXTREMELY hard to get 80 catches, 1400 yards and 9 td's worth of luck in the NFL. Unless you meant most as in 51%. And then even 42 td's, 7.45 scores and 4.7 td's is pretty hard to "luck" in to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tabularasa Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Gotcha SkinsHokiefan. It had to be a joke, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.