Sacks 'n' Stuff

I'm saying its more transparent silliness to have different expectations for timelines into investigations and the results thereof based on whether the person being investigated happens to belong to the same political party as you.

Maybe in a few more years we can find something in those Benghazi email foundation servers.

Trump and Putin were both saying it like three weeks ago though.

Btw... wasn't it like a fortnight ago that US - Russia relations were at an all time low? What happened with that?

Really? REALLY?? You're kidding! Yes twa. You got us. Everybody retreat. The jig is up.

All the bad hombres have poured in by now. We're as good as dead and we don't even know it.

Gonna be real fun to rehash a lot of your posts when this is all said & done.

WHAT THE ****?!?!?!?! This **** has gotten out of hand. Time to impeach this mother****er. edit: Flynn has something on Trump, doesn't he?

YES!!!!

I have a two part question... 1.)At what point did the realization that what used to be the Republican Party is now a cesspool of unprincipled ****heads set in? 2.)Why did you make the conscious decision to keep up with this facade anyway?

Which thread was the "what political figure would you punch in the face" question posed in again?

Kinda like the neutron bomb. The one that kills people but spares buildings. Most people are against it. Most buildings are ok with it.

It'll be frustrating as hell watching the left immediately forgive them and the right carry on their delusional fantasies that nothing bad happened and they were right all along.

More like what used to be the Republican Party has been compromised by the GOP.

incompetent maliciousness vs malicious incompetence

Doesn't mean trump was in cahoots with Russia It could be something totally innocent, like incompetence or not giving a **** about the country.

You forget bout the time that Trump called his wife a fat, disgusting, whore pig and then Cruz bent over for him in a shed out back?

THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN TRYING TO TELL YOU ALL!!!!

In response to question 1, I don't know. I'd have to see an example. in response to question 2, I hope question one was better and less of an attempt to jam some made up justification into the conversation with twa's crowbar of incoherence.

The ____ established the ______ to acknowledge and serve the needs of crime victims and their families who have been impacted by crimes committed by white people. Mission Statement With honor and integrity, we will support victims of crimes committed by white people through access to information and resources. Objectives Use a victim-centered approach to acknowledge and support white crime victims and their families. Promote awareness of rights and services available to white crime victims. Build collaborative partnerships with community stakeholders assisting white crime victims. Provide quarterly reports studying the effects of the victimization by white people present in the United States. The men and women comprising the ________ will be guided by a singular, straightforward mission – to ensure victims and their families have access to releasable information about a perpetrator and to offer assistance explaining the how to punish white people. _______ wants to ensure those victimized by criminal whites feel heard, seen and supported. ^You'd be through the ****ing roof. edit: I wonder is Sacase posted in the "What percentage of White People are Racist?" thread. i'm sure he holds a similar position on both subjects, guided by his steadfast principles.

Riiiiiiiiiight. That's exactly the message ?. Please don't insult my intelligence.

One of us actually believes this.

You'd be cool with an agency dedicated solely to highlighting crimes committed by your demographic?

Would be interested to see the demographics of those detained, deported, etc.

^ Excellent.