RedskinsFan44
Members-
Posts
82 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Articles
Downloads
Everything posted by RedskinsFan44
-
This Judge knows way more about what Flynn did than you or I. Why was he so angry? After formally accepting Flynn's guilty plea, the judge threw a series of questions at him that highlighted how unusual Flynn's case is and how consequential his actions may be. Did Flynn believe he was not guilty? Did he think he was entrapped by the FBI when they interviewed him without a defense attorney present? Had Mueller's team considered charging Flynn with other crimes, including treason? Flynn and the lawyers' answers to all of these questions were no. Yet Sullivan pressed on, his voice growing more shrill as he discussed Flynn's actions. Flynn lied even "in the presence of the White House," Sullivan added. "You can't minimize that." "I am not hiding my disgust, my disdain for your criminal offense," Sullivan said, pausing between each statement. "Yes, your honor," Flynn said. He was not asked a question. https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/18/politics/michael-flynn-sentencing-mueller-russia-probe/index.html You are, why shouldn't I? Add: Going to another aspect of the Trump presidency, wouldn't it be nice if your national security adviser were aware of laws he is supposed to follow? Seems like an important position.
-
Other administrations did, which is why she should have known better. I believe it was a large part of what cost her the election (it shouldn't have). This is off topic for this thread, but get used to it. If you shout "lock her up!" (Trump, not you) then you better live clean: https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-democrats-probe-white-house-officials-email-use-11553188033?mod=e2tw
-
If there is no charge I would be surprised but i would not feel bad for suspecting Trump et al of tcollusion due to the already documented lies about Russian contacts, the altering of the Republican platform, and the lies about the Trump Tower meeting. There is plenty of reason to suspect him of it, there is a lot of circumstantial evidence. If he;'s innocent he's innocent. I disliked him before he ever ran based on his character, and I feel he has been a horrible person as President, so I won't be like, oh I was totally wrong about him if he is cleared of collusion. Still a rotten person, and even his supporters for the most part know that, and many acknowledge it. It's jus he's their rotten person.
-
Have you considered the idea that the reason we haven't heard the particulars of the collusion case and the lack of "collusion" indictments is because it is an on-going investigation run in an exceptionally professional way as evidenced by the lack of leaks? What do you think Flynn gave Muelller in his plea deal? Gates? What did Manafort lie about (that Mueller knew he was lying about)? Why is Graham blocking legislation to make the report public? Why dows Trump feel the need to hypnotize his base with "NO COLLUSION!!" and "WITCH HUNT!!"? Why all the lies about Russian contacts? Yeah, I'll be shocked if Mueller comes back with nothing on collusion, but the crimes people are being convicted of are real crimes. Clinton was investigated about a real estate deal, i don't hear a lot of remorse that he ended up getting in trouble for lying about philandering.
-
Trump Border Wall Post-Shutdown Discussion (Wall-Fight)
RedskinsFan44 replied to Fergasun's topic in The Tailgate
Yeah, they are all for preventing future Democratic presidents from pulling this crap. But stand up to Trump? Nah.