KirkNC Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Moss Patten Jacobs Thrash McCants Your thoughts? I like the looks of that group, lots of speed and speed with ramseys arm will open the way for Clinton. I see an Air Coryell Offense coming our way in 2005! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEANTAYLORISDAMAN Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 yea..i think thats solid..assuming we dont drafta wr..i think even in the later rounds we could pick up a guy w/ some upside..i really like s. moss though...Sir Gibbs says we couldnt get big plays..he deeffinatley has playmaking ability :helmet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tae Bo Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 its not Monk/Clark/Sanders but it will do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 That's probably what it will be. Should be decent, but not a dominating group. I think its a downgrade from last year unless someone improves significantly from last year (Moss? Jacobs? McCants?) I can see it happening, but I don't have my hopes up. I also think we might end up drafting a WR, but probably not Edwards or Williams. That will help, but probably won't improve our WRs drastically automatically. Hope I'm wrong though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Steve Spurrier would envy our speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnacpa Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 I doubt D-Mac is on the squad .... isn't Antonio Brown a WR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSkipper Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 A lot of speed with McCants ready for the Jumbo packages. I like it a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Mcants will be gone and Williamson will be in. Too much info about he Skins targeting him. So this will be the deal: Moss, Williamson, Patterson, Jacobs. An excellent WR core that has speed beyond light years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Hog Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 I like it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 McCants will be gone soon. His replacement was just signed, Patten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Why did we give McCants that new contract just to dump him the next year? :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 id prefer Patten Williams/Edwards Jacobs Thrash McCants Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Williams Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 We still don't have a true #1.... We have a bunch of great 3's though:D.....6 of 'm....:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 id prefer Patten Williams/Edwards Jacobs Thrash McCants But OldS, You are forgetting about Coles/Moss. I agree. I would rather have Edwards or Williams. I would love it if we could get Williams, but I don't think it will happen. I see Williams going to the Bears and Edwards going to the Vikes. I think that the Bears will shunt Edwards from past history and we end up with a decision on do we pull the trigger at #9, which I believe we don't and trade down a few spots and get him at a few spots lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Originally posted by bnacpa I doubt D-Mac is on the squad .... isn't Antonio Brown a WR? I think Gibbs has given DMac a chance to get himself out of the dog house. DMac is somewhat immature... and hopefully what Gibbs did last season will have a positive effect on him to get his act together and work his way up the depth chart. Dmac recently said on the radio he called Gibbs and had a good talk about what he did wrong. From what I read, DMac seemed to understand his faults and seemed willing to improve this off season and training camp. We shall see how things pan out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Sorry, him being Williamson. The skins have eyed the kid for a good while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sealskin Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 I think Gibbs has given DMac a chance to get himself out of the dog house. DMac is somewhat immature... and hopefully what Gibbs did last season will have a positive effect on him to get his act together and work his way up the depth chart. Dmac recently said on the radio he called Gibbs and had a good talk about what he did wrong. From what I read, DMac seemed to understand his faults and seemed willing to improve this off season and training camp. We shall see how things pan out. I really hope this is true. Dmac was a good target for Pat in the redzone and in the middle of the field two seasons ago. He would make a nice possesion receiver to replace rod. It would be nice if him and Jacobs can step up since they are familiar with the offense already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdavis2005 Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Maybe Patten was brought in to help someone like D-Mac w/ his work ethic. Also, I guess Moss wouldn't be a bad pickup. He's similar to Steve Smith, who's a pretty goood reciever/playmaker for Carolina, who came into the league the same year as Moss. In fact, Moss has more yds and twice as many TDs as Smith w/ 7 fewer receptions. One of the primary things I got from listening to Gibbs after the press conference is that he wants to throw the ball deep this year and also wants receivers that can create after the catch something Gardner/Coles post toe injury(the most overrated duo) couldn't do. Their YAC numbers had to suck b/c everytime I saw them catch a screen they were brought down and we all know they couldn't get open deep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bedlamVR Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Every day the Moss/Coles deal doesn't go though it makes it less likely. Eveyone keeps saying the deal is done but it makes no sence what so ever for us ? Could some one please tell me why the Skins would want this deal now ? Moss didn't even have as good a year as Patten did last year and Patten is a 3rd reciever and Moss was supposed to be the No.1. Also could i ask the people who are saying the deal is done what is thier source . The only person that seems to be harping on about this happening is Lenny P who also had the major scoop that we were going for Rolle at 12.02 on 03/02/2005. Other papers are repeating it but tend to be reguritating Len Ps words. Not saying the deal wont be done I just don't see it being as cut and dried as eveyone thinks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskins4life234 Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 My choice would be Moss Pattents (Good Rookie) Jacobs Thrash And sadly, mcants is syaing bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 if DMac was going... he would have already been released Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stone Cold Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 it's time for us to make "somebodies" out of "nobodies"...about time if you ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunPortisRun Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 I still say we sign Plaxico. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernskinfan Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Originally posted by bedlamVR Every day the Moss/Coles deal doesn't go though it makes it less likely. Eveyone keeps saying the deal is done but it makes no sence what so ever for us ? Could some one please tell me why the Skins would want this deal now ? Moss didn't even have as good a year as Patten did last year and Patten is a 3rd reciever and Moss was supposed to be the No.1. Thank you! My feelings exactly. How is getting Moss for Coles a good thing? :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs4Life Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 i see an entire group of recievers than have yet to have a one thousand yard season. Not # 1 reciever in the whole group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.