illone Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 This guy is a RAC specialist. http://www.nmnathletics.com/video2/VGOLHTFXJBTOVBX.20031107162659.wmv Wouldn't mind him as an alternative to Big Mike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 WOW. This guy can FLY. And his footwork is off the charts. I'd love to take him if Williams or Edwards are off the board. Ironically he reminds me of a healthy Laveranues Coles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted February 28, 2005 Author Share Posted February 28, 2005 Originally posted by Warhead36 WOW. This guy can FLY. And his footwork is off the charts. I'd love to take him if Williams or Edwards are off the board. Ironically he reminds me of a healthy Laveranues Coles. Yea, definitely accounted for alot of Jason White's success and hype;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Nice footage right there...good post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreek1973 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 In a nice trade down and a second pick AND in Williamson is gone i would take him. He looks to be a huge threat to run after the catch also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 I KNEW IT!!! no really, i wanted him over williamson, but i got a strict telling to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted February 28, 2005 Author Share Posted February 28, 2005 Hey ghost, do the rest of us a favor and change your sig:laugh: I am tired of looking at those big white warnings:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sisko Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Mike Williams will need a WCO to excel. Clayton would do well with the WR screens Gibbs seems to favor and he's got enough speed to go deep. I'd be much happier with Clayton than Williams. OTOH I was in favor of us drafting 50/50 so my credibility isn't all that great:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Originally posted by illone Hey ghost, do the rest of us a favor and change your sig:laugh: I am tired of looking at those big white warnings:D ask and you shall recieve hows this? EDIT: and yet, somehow, i can't get access to my own profile, interesting, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted February 28, 2005 Author Share Posted February 28, 2005 That's hot dood. Thanks:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soljaofjesus Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 illone Keep the highlights coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted February 28, 2005 Author Share Posted February 28, 2005 Originally posted by Yusuf06 Mike Williams will need a WCO to excel. Clayton would do well with the WR screens Gibbs seems to favor and he's got enough speed to go deep. I'd be much happier with Clayton than Williams. OTOH I was in favor of us drafting 50/50 so my credibility isn't all that great:doh: We can talk more about Williams in that thread, but I think this guy Clayton would be a great pickup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor The Invincible Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 I've always perferred Clayton. He's just a fluid runner. I just want to go on record as wanting to draft Mark Clayton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsForLife260 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 whats his 40? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted February 28, 2005 Author Share Posted February 28, 2005 Originally posted by SkinsForLife260 whats his 40? I read somewhere that it was 4.3 ish, I'll find the link and post. If anyone else has the link, please post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsChick36 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Alternative? heck i'd take him over williams, iknow i have talking up Williams but i'm changing ships. Clayton has a better 40 times, better footwork, proven/ tested (senior 4 year starter) Strong ( about the same as williams according to the guys covering the combine yesterday) and he would fit perfectly in our system... throw to short stretches it out for a long gain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 DRAFT HIM Wow... he looked Barry-esque on a lot of those plays. How's his straight ahead speed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sisko Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Originally posted by zoony DRAFT HIM Wow... he looked Barry-esque on a lot of those plays. How's his straight ahead speed? Wow Zoony, you channelled almost exactly what I was thinking about him. My thoughts were that he reminds me of a combo of Barry Sanders and Joey Galloway. If we could trade down a few spots and still pick this guy up that would be an ideal first round in my book. Now all we need is for the Bears and Vikes to cooperate and take Williams and Edwards off the board. Let's just hope Snyderatto isn't thinking about trading up:paranoid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 He ran a 4.3 40. Man he made that Texas D look FOOLISH. Haha. I'd love to draft him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayjay33 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 He looks great but remember, we need a coach who will throw it long (@ least over 15 yards) and a quarterback who can get it there consistently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4SB Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 He definatly isn't going to be a red zone target. What was his vertical? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Originally posted by Skins4SB He definatly isn't going to be a red zone target. What was his vertical? I think his vertical was Chris Cooley, if I'm not mistaken. We don't need a red zone target, imho. What we need is a playmaker and a burner in our WR corps. ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Gut Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Originally posted by illone I read somewhere that it was 4.3 ish, I'll find the link and post. If anyone else has the link, please post. Clayton had a 4.3 40? yeah right, if he runs a 4.3, why is no one talking about him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SILKYSMOOTH Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 very impressive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Originally posted by Skeletor The Invincible I've always perferred Clayton. He's just a fluid runner. I just want to go on record as wanting to draft Mark Clayton. hey hey hey! get in line, bub! im first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.