themaddog93 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 O.K. Randy to Oakland for #7 pick. Minnesota has #7 and #18. Coles to Minnesota for #18 pick. Coles would love the down field passes from Culpepper. :point2sky :point2sky :point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAsBeachBoy Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Wed have to get Williamson with the 9 if we do that and I do't think I wanna do that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I already called it.:laugh: http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=92336&perpage=15&display=&pagenumber=3 Too bad though. It's been reported the Vikes want Williams. Still, we can pray. :halo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themaddog93 Posted February 24, 2005 Author Share Posted February 24, 2005 Sorry Mad Mike didnt see it. :point2sky :point2sky :point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvoSkins Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Not gonna happen unless Coles lessens the cap hit on the Skins. The Vikes are a pass-first team that should be to his liking. If Coles would void the $5 million bonus, I would gladly take the 18th pick. Its gonna be a mad March. Why is it that the offseason seems to be more exciting than the regular season for the Redskins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 My thinking is that Coles will come to an agreement to pay back $2 or $3 mill of his signing bonus instead of the $5mill and we trade him to the Ravens for their #22. Just my thought, but it might not happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by Mad Mike I already called it.:laugh: http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=92336&perpage=15&display=&pagenumber=3 Too bad though. It's been reported the Vikes want Williams. Still, we can pray. :halo: Hey they might miss their pick again :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Vikes need D a lot more than they need O. They can sign a WR (Mason, Muhhamed) and draft an impact defensive player (Jones, Rolle). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurgundyBlood Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 If we traded Coles for #18 we could probably draft o-linemen with 9 AND 18 and then it won't matter who we're throwing to. The O-line will be Fort Knox. How much you wanna bet Samuals has a miraculous return to Pro Bowl form with Alex Barron (learning to play in the NFL at guard and biding his time until Samuals is traded in 06) and a first round quality C guarding his right side...hmmm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTaylor22 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I sure hope them Vikes dont pick Williams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by BurgundyBlood If we traded Coles for #18 we could probably draft o-linemen with 9 AND 18 and then it won't matter who we're throwing to. The O-line will be Fort Knox. How much you wanna bet Samuals has a miraculous return to Pro Bowl form with Alex Barron (learning to play in the NFL at guard and biding his time until Samuals is traded in 06) and a first round quality C guarding his right side...hmmm? No way we draft 2 offensive linemen in the first round. I think FA is gonna solve either our center or guard problems, hopefully. Also, starting 2 rookies on the line? It can work, but its not likely. Samuels will hopefully re-structure, otherwise he is gone this season. Thomas and Jansen are our 2 solid people, unfortunately they both play on the right. Ben Wilkerson is the best rated center, and he may fall to the 3rd round even it seems. Elton Brown and David Baas are both stellar guards, but since Brown is not staying in shape, he may fall to the 2nd round now. I would not mind trading Coles and Gardner to the Vikings for their 18th pick. I dont see why they shouldnt, 2 decent wideouts to complement Burleson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTaylor22 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Man imagine us with 2 first rounders. The possibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
36SKINS56 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 If we get two first round picks, WR with our first pick...O line with the second...two offensive line rookies would be a disaster...That is a good point about tradin coles and gardner to Minn. Thats definately possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTaylor22 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Ya it would sick. Plus if we settled out OLine in FA and the Vikes didnt take Williams or Edwards. We could snag one of them with out 9 and take Heath Miller with our 18. Imagine that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LA56Dawg Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 if we do get two first round picks, we should use the #9 on edwards, williams, or williamson (whoever is available) and then the 18 on a DE... that would be the perfect scenario and when Gardner is traded for maybe a 2nd we will go for a Center or Guard.. thats a very good draft IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by themaddog93 O.K. Randy to Oakland for #7 pick. Minnesota has #7 and #18. Coles to Minnesota for #18 pick. Coles would love the down field passes from Culpepper. :point2sky :point2sky :point2sky First thing's first. Coles has to AGREE to be traded first. If he doesn't agree to be traded, he will kill our cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by CowboyzSuckAzz First thing's first. Coles has to AGREE to be traded first. If he doesn't agree to be traded, he will kill our cap. not when Samuels signs his restructured deal. who says we'll release him. Gibbs can play hardball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegeta613 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I doubt Minny would give us a first for Coles I would Take a 2nd and a swap of 7 and 9 Skins get 2nd round Draft pick and 7th pick overall Vikes Get Coles, 9th Pick overall I think coles is worth a late first at best No one is going to trade a high first Rounder for a WR with a questionable Toe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 With both Moss and Porter off the Market.... Coles Value increased easily to a mid-high 1st rounder or a late 1st, plus a player or later pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 not when Samuels signs his restructured deal. who says we'll release him. Gibbs can play hardball Oh, I agree. There's no chance in hell we release him outright. IF Samuels restructures, then we can trade Coles & take the hit (I believe). So, does that mean that everything is revolving around Samuels then & NOT Coles? If that's the case, then Samuels needs to restructure soon, so they can make a decision on Coles & stop all the insanity (I just has a Susan Powder moment...:ahhhhh: ). :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegeta613 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 With both Moss and Porter off the Market.... Coles Value increased easily to a mid-high 1st rounder or a late 1st, plus a player or later pick Coles Value wont increase because teams know he wants out and on top of that he is not even 100% If we can get a mid First for him it would be a blessing but I just dont think its Logical Late First at best is all we can get for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by CowboyzSuckAzz Oh, I agree. There's no chance in hell we release him outright. IF Samuels restructures, then we can trade Coles & take the hit (I believe). So, does that mean that everything is revolving around Samuels then & NOT Coles? Bingo, hence Gibbs statement about player waiting to due deals. Samuels signing is just around the corner, and will put the ball in Coles court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.