RemoveSnyder Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 Man, some of you guys are underestimating a crazy, drunk, Irsay. I mean, crazy alone, guy is capable of lots of wild stuff. But drunk? Forget about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carex Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 you know, the entire team wouldn't have to be in on it. Just the coaching staff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 A team wide cover up, to tank? That's absurd. Maybe they half assed it a bit, but no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsGuy Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 Yes they did lol No they didn't. That is the thinking of "little minds" that are still bitter that the Colts' drafting of Luck has worked out for them and the Redskins' drafting of Griffin has not (so far ). You need to get over it already. you know, the entire team wouldn't have to be in on it. Just the coaching staff For the planning of it, yes. But the cover-up of it, no. You would need more than just the coaches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carex Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 No they didn't. That is the thinking of "little minds" that are still bitter that the Colts' drafting of Luck has worked out for them and the Redskins' drafting of Griffin has not (so far ). You need to get over it already. For the planning of it, yes. But the cover-up of it, no. You would need more than just the coaches. the players would never know for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 the players would never know for sure So, just to be clear- we are alleging that the Indy coaches , without cooperation from the players, intentionally lost 14 games that year? And these coaches are the same ones who all got fired at the end of the year for these efforts? Just so I'm clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carex Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 So, just to be clear- we are alleging that the Indy coaches , without cooperation from the players, intentionally lost 14 games that year? And these coaches are the same ones who all got fired at the end of the year for these efforts? Just so I'm clear. they weren't exactly going to be Super Bowl contenders without Manning so why not. A 6-10 or 7-9 season probably would have gotten them fired anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 they weren't exactly going to be Super Bowl contenders without Manning so why not. A 6-10 or 7-9 season probably would have gotten them fired anyway OK, then we're clear- You are saying something monumentally laughable. Thanks for the clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.