MattFancy Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 We're definitely not a top 5 or top 10 team yet. But #23? Either he had us really low to start the season or didn't move us at all after last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rpredskins Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 There were many teams who came into the season ranked way ahead of us who lost and/or played poorly - dallas, san diego, cincinatti, atlanta, ny jets, san fran. I think the "experts" still put them ahead of us and I wont argue with that because quite honestly its hard to put the redskins ahead of the chargers after only 1 game. But if we beat Houston this weekend, I think its time for a big leap. It wouldnt be unreasonable to put washington in the same category or higher than the teams mentioned (plus houston). But we still have a lot to prove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsCrushCowboys Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 means nothing...about as accurate as having a pig walk around a numbered board and dump on a number......week 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinisterJay Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 who the hell would trust a guy named Buckey anyways?!?!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWFLSkins Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 If I'm being honest 23rd is more reasonable than 4th. absolutely agree on that. Around 10 to 15 would make sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWFLSkins Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 The averge ranking out of this sample size (8) would have us at #13, which may still be a tad bit high. Actually i have us at the middle of the pack somewhere around 15 - 17. I would have us a little higher but I could buy your range as well. I just think there only about 10 teams that would clearly be ranked above the Skins at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailSkins83 Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I heared today that Douch Bag Matt Williamson from Scouts Inc. has us in the mid 20's.....He is the host of Football Today and doesnt know spit about football, he is a total joke! He actually DROPPED us 1 since last week! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 #4 is too high, #23 is a joke. The Redskins right now are at the cusp of being a playoff contender so somewhere around #11 or #12 seems about right with 1 game being a limited sample size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_Bleed_B&G Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I'm surprised Theisman doesn't have us at #1, #2 and #3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fnkdctr(007) Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Carruci to after one win. I'm a homer and even I'm not that blind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkekoa Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I'd say the Cowboys still belong ahead of us and that we should be 10 to 15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icbmayday Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Four lol thats shocking I can't even rate us that high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmy Smith Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Us at #4 is very flattering but very ridiculous... still so early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bedlamVR Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 4 is a joke . This team is obviously a team trying to establish itself . Mid 20s right now would be the right level . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.