Big Weirdo Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 Hey all. Been a while since I have been around. Wanted to drop in and give my in depth analysis on the Eagles as their first preseason game is around the corner on Friday. They're average and the O-line really sucks from what I've read. But T'eo NeIdonntknowhislastname apparently has earned the really cool nickname of the Silent Killer for being really quiet off the field! And really tenacious on. Oh yeah. Missed you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman21ST Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 Hey all. Been a while since I have been around. Wanted to drop in and give my in depth analysis on the Eagles as their first preseason game is around the corner on Friday.They're average and the O-line really sucks from what I've read. But T'eo NeIdonntknowhislastname apparently has earned the really cool nickname of the Silent Killer for being really quiet off the field! And really tenacious on. Oh yeah. Missed you guys. How can Kolb be the second coming if their OL sucks though??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted August 11, 2010 Author Share Posted August 11, 2010 The second coming of what? Bobby Hoying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeMarco Murray 29 Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 Welcome back Who Del Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 Welcome back, WD...I first thought your thread read, "Asses...the Eagles" I'm geezing badly today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botched Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 My assessment of the Eagles: :pooh: After thorough analysis and an in-depth breakdown of their coaching and player personnel I came to a similar conclusion about the Cowboys and Giants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 **** the Iggles. That's my assessment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OWUeagleMD Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 Eagles look like an 8-8 team to me, probably good enough for a third place finish in the division. They took a lot of gambles and are counting almost exclusively on young and unproven players. There's a chance that each of them will work out individually, but it's a virtual guarantee that they won't all work out simultaneously. I like the young depth at corner, but I'd like it better if it was playing behind a proven veteran as opposed to Ellis Hobbs. I've got justifiably high hopes for Nate Allen. But he's a rookie starting in week 1 at free safety. If an Eagles opponent was in the same situation, I'd assume Reid and Morningwhig would target him all day. I like the increased size and athleticism in the linebacking corps, but I'd like it better if it didn't rely on the surgically repaired knee of Stew Bradley and the still-unfulfilled potential of Ernie Sims. I actually don't have anything bad to say about the D-line. I expect them to be as stout against the run as they were last year while applying a bit more pressure with the arrival of Brandon Graham. The offensive tackles played well last year and should only improve with experience. The interior of the line is another story. It's hard not to be concerned with Herremans' injury, no matter what the team says, center is a clear problem, and Stacy Andrews was the worst player on the team last year. It's possible that Herremans is fine, that Jackson will recover by mid season or McGlynn will play well in his stead, and that Andrews will return to pro bowl form. It's virtually impossible that all three of those things happen. No complaints at receiver or tight end. Star power and productivity at the top of the depth chart with youth, upside, and special teams ability at the bottom, just what you're looking for. McCoy had an OK rookie season. If he's as good as he was last year, we'll have a sub-par running game. If he improves the way you'd expect, it could be very good. After him there's a group of veterans that shouldn't excite anyone. Another optimistic question mark, but a question mark all the same. Then there's Kolb. Everything that can be said on that topic has been said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefenderoftheStar Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 My assessment of the Eagles: :pooh:After thorough analysis and an in-depth breakdown of their coaching and player personnel I came to a similar conclusion about the Cowboys and Giants. thats a heck of a forumula you are using there. What happens if its wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 thats a heck of a forumula you are using there. What happens if its wrong? Then I imagine he'll know what you feel like the majority of the time you post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HapHaszard Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 Welcome back Who Del good to see you wandering around the room again. Can't wait for the "Fat Andy" comments to start up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 My assessment: They wear green, have wings on their helmets and their coach is fat. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 Missed you guys. Check your PM and email. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sideshow24 Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Then I imagine he'll know what you feel like the majority of the time you post That was awful. Awful ENTERTAINING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.