Ax Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 Dude, you've got to know by now that the minute you start in with that nonsense your credibility drops to zero. Dude, when dealing with this one, like, anybody who doesn't, like, you know, agree with him already has, like, zero credibility. But thanks for your concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoot Point Really Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 THE WORST ECONOMY SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 Honestly, this is something I have argued for years that campaign finance reform needs to be pushed through with real teethYou must suck the money out of politics Senator Obama broke a promise on public funding of his campaign, which is actually my biggest criticism of him. The system that we currently use to finance our campaigns leads to the corruption, greed, and just piss poor governing that we see Hopefully he hasn't been hanging around the Chinese at any fundraisers like Al Gore did back in 1996 My solution: Ban political TV advertising. You will suck the money out of politics and get real solutions and real "change" Spending 600 million dollars on a political campaign, when there are many other issues affecting our country, is a joke IMO Quoted for truth. Especially the underlined portion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 Each campaign should be given 100million ea., spend it as you see fit. Each campaign is given free air time on OUR airwaves. They get bought and paid for and then we freak out when they give favors.. we are all idiots for revoting for the same people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sith lord Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 WOW!!! Simply, WOW!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted October 20, 2008 Author Share Posted October 20, 2008 What's even crazier is the average donation was $48.39My donations to his campaign have been the best investment I've made so far in my 21 years on this planet. Love the sig brikem05!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted October 20, 2008 Author Share Posted October 20, 2008 You're just mad because someone dared to question your false prophet. Whatever Ax. FYI if you don't want someone to assume what you mean by posting a link and quoting from a web site then you might clarify why you are posting it, instead of using it as a backdoor to bash someone when they interpret why you posted it, its called communication, if you don't want your message misinterpreted then you need to clarify your message, in the end your behavior smells of troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 What's even crazier is the average donation was $48.39My donations to his campaign have been the best investment I've made so far in my 21 years on this planet. I feel pretty good about sending a few bucks to the Paul campaign myself, but I don't see it as a loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccsl2 Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 What a crock and you know it. Obama and his team reneged on an initial promise and made a calculated assessment that his campaign could finance it through other means than matching funds and because of this strategy they lessen the chance the FEC will/can audit where their contributions come frome. Any chance those "foreign" contributions will be identified and sent back?? Don't hate the player, hate the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ax Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 Whatever Ax. FYI if you don't want someone to assume what you mean by posting a link and quoting from a web site then you might clarify why you are posting it, instead of using it as a backdoor to bash someone when they interpret why you posted it, its called communication, if you don't want your message misinterpreted then you need to clarify your message Maybe you should be asking yourself why you are obsessed with making things up instead of asking the simple question, "Ax, I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Care to clarify?" No, instead you chose to radiate ignorance, by telling me, what I meant. So let me see if I get this straight, you are mad at Obama for following the law that does not require disclosure of under $200?And you want to criticize Obama for information you want to find, versus information that you have found? You're also mad that people broke contribution laws by giving false information, and I guess you're mad that the Obama campaign is returning that falsely donated money too. So, by saying nothing at all, you ASSUME to know what I think, accusing me of your assumptions, while stating half of them in the form of a question. (Talk about your backdoors) Fine, mind if I give it a try? I'll use this line. You know, desperation doesn't quite describe what I'm hearing, and I won't even mention the objectivity of newsmax.com. So, let me see if I get this straight, you are mad at me because there are voices in your head, (you obviously didn't hear anything from me, since they're only words on a screen) and these voices keep telling you that you must tell people what they're really saying, even when they've said nothing at all? You must also be mad that you can't help but come off as stupid, saying you won't even mention the objectivity of newsmax.com, while actually MENTIONING the objectivity of newsmax.com. That about right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 I actually think ax has... well an axe to grind. In all three debates, Obama chided McCain about using an Axe. Now, if you were Ax how would you feel about that? That was very un-PC of Senator Obama... alienating the ax demographic like that. Of course, the scalpel demographic is feeling fine and dandy right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ax Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 I actually think ax has... well an axe to grind. In all three debates, Obama chided McCain about using an Axe. Now, if you were Ax how would you feel about that? That was very un-PC of Senator Obama... alienating the ax demographic like that. Of course, the scalpel demographic is feeling fine and dandy right now. Damn you Burgold! Damn you to hell! I should have known someone with a significant portion of their brain working properly would read right through me. Bastage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 Damn you Burgold! Damn you to hell! I should have known someone with a significant portion of their brain working properly would read right through me.Bastage. Dems fighting words. :hammer: I mean seriously those are the Dems fighting words. Shouldn't you be using the Repubs fighting words? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ax Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 Dems fighting words. :hammer:I mean seriously those are the Dems fighting words. Shouldn't you be using the Repubs fighting words? Oh yeah, you terrorist loving libral!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 better lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.