Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Draft Tek simulation:Mock Draft rounds 1-7(I would be very,very happy with this!)

michael_33

By michael_33
in The Stadium

Recommended Posts

michael_33

michael_33

Posted
Posted

http://www.drafttek.com/round12008.html

(7-Rounds of evaluation)

1)Blue chipper and fills need

2)Very good player and fills need

3)BPA and fills need

4)BPA and helps for depth

5)Solid pick and very well could start

6)Solid pick and should help for depth

7)No need and probably won't make team

Washington Redskins

---------------------

Round 1:#21st pick=Kentwan Balmer DT (North Carolina)

Round 2:#52nd pick=Lawrence Jackson DE (USC)

Round 3:#85th pick=Chilo Rachal OG (USC)

Round 4:N/A

Round 5:#149th pick=Tyvon Branch CB (U-Conn)

Round 6:#180th pick=Dorien Bryant WR (Purdue)

Round 7:#212th pick=Devin Clark OT (New Mexico)

This is probably my favorite mock as far as what would help the team the most...Of course,they still have to pan out and not be busts!

It's pretty apparent that 90% of Mock drafts have us taking a DL-man in 1 of the first 2 rounds nationwide...I would be very discouraged as a fan if we did NOT address a glaring need here for like 15 years...

Vinny...you know what to do!Be smart and get it done!! :cheers: :2cents:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
michael_33

michael_33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
]']What a Stupid Draft. Lets draft an Over Rated DT' date=' followed by a DE who only looks good because he played next to a really good DT.

I don't understand what part of that would make you happy.[/quote']

And from your sig,you apparently want a WR that may pan out in his 2nd,3rd or 4th year...(Sweed)

May see the field if there's an injury to Moss or El....might have 10-20 catches his 1st season.....then probably pulls a groin in his second year that keeps him sidelined for 1/2 the season.....Then by the time he's in year 3,his contract is up and he's demanding a payraise or he's been traded or released cause he's a lockerroom problem or whatever...?

While Balmer and Jackson earn their starting roles and fortify the front 4 for the next decade...as we go on to win the division and the rest is history...

Nah......I like this draft better than your idea of picking up Sweed or some other WR bust!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cathartic-j

cathartic-j

Posted
Posted

Do any of us really watch enough college game footage to know which players will turn out to be good in the pros? Even the guys who get paid to do that full-time (scouts + FO guys) are wrong on a regular basis. I guess somebody will end up with the satisfaction of being able to say, "I called it!!!! I knew he'd be good!!!!" But seriously, this argument (and most of the other draft-related ones) is a little ridiculous.

Not to mention that we have pretty much no idea about who will be available in each round...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
[[ghost]]

[[ghost]]

Posted
Posted
And from your sig,you apparently want a WR that may pan out in his 2nd,3rd or 4th year...(Sweed)

May see the field if there's an injury to Moss or El....might have 10-20 catches his 1st season.....then probably pulls a groin in his second year that keeps him sidelined for 1/2 the season.....Then by the time he's in year 3,his contract is up and he's demanding a payraise or he's been traded or released cause he's a lockerroom problem or whatever...?

While Balmer and Jackson earn their starting roles and fortify the front 4 for the next decade...as we go on to win the division and the rest is history...

Nah......I like this draft better than your idea of picking up Sweed or some other WR bust!

Its wonderful how you just simulated their entire careers, and have already proclaimed us a dynasty through the addition of a mediocre DT coupled with an over rated DE.

You're so delusional, its no wonder you don't realize that the best WRs in this league are former 1st Rounders, whereas the Best DL are former 2nd Day picks.

Care to back up your proclamation that those terrible picks are actually worth picking with some facts? Because you'll only embarrass yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
michael_33

michael_33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
]']Its wonderful how you just simulated their entire careers' date=' and have already proclaimed us a dynasty through the addition of a mediocre DT coupled with an over rated DE.

You're so delusional, its no wonder you don't realize that the best WRs in this league are former 1st Rounders, whereas the Best DL are former 2nd Day picks.

Care to back up your proclamation that those terrible picks are actually worth picking with some facts? Because you'll only embarrass yourself.[/quote']

Michael Westbrook

Rod Gardner

Desmond Howard

Just pure Legends... :doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DCchillin89

DCchillin89

Posted
Posted

I am loving this draft, even though some of the fantasy footballer's out there who are obsessed with the flashy picks may hate on it. The battle of football is won and lost in the trenches. While I may not be totally in love with the individual picks. (I would actually go DT in round 2 Trevor Laws and DE in round 1 Merling, Groves, Harvey, Campbell) it adds depth to the most fragile aspect of our team. When has Griff finished an entire season? It is like a law for one Redskins O linemen to miss a significant part of the season. These picks and this philosophy sure isn't sexy, but it is low risk and this strategy has a better chance of paying off than WR in the first and then OL's.

My Draft with the same philosophy just different picks

1.) Brandon Albert

2.) Trevor Laws

3.) Lawrence Jackson or best 4-3 pass rusher available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
michael_33

michael_33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I am loving this draft, even though some of the fantasy footballer's out there who are obsessed with the flashy picks may hate on it. The battle of football is won and lost in the trenches. While I may not be totally in love with the individual picks. (I would actually go DT in round 2 Trevor Laws and DE in round 1 Merling, Groves, Harvey, Campbell) it adds depth to the most fragile aspect of our team. When has Griff finished an entire season? It is like a law for one Redskins O linemen to miss a significant part of the season. These picks and this philosophy sure isn't sexy, but it is low risk and this strategy has a better chance of paying off than WR in the first and then OL's.

My Draft with the same philosophy just different picks

1.) Brandon Albert

2.) Trevor Laws

3.) Lawrence Jackson or best 4-3 pass rusher available.

OMG!!!An intellegent poster and someone who actually understands the importance of having a d-line....

If we draft a WR,we will surely reap the the results of his biggest supporter..."Ghost"!! :doh:

He will never be seen.... :silly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DCchillin89

DCchillin89

Posted
Posted
]']Its wonderful how you just simulated their entire careers' date=' and have already proclaimed us a dynasty through the addition of a mediocre DT coupled with an over rated DE.

You're so delusional, its no wonder you don't realize that the best WRs in this league are former 1st Rounders, whereas the Best DL are former 2nd Day picks.

Care to back up your proclamation that those terrible picks are actually worth picking with some facts? Because you'll only embarrass yourself.[/quote']

I couldn't disagree more with the WR's notion. Actually drafting a WR in round one is one of the well known NFL caveats. I am surpised you didn't no that

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jesus, Mary & Joe Gibbs

Jesus, Mary & Joe Gibbs

Posted
Posted
Why on earth any mock draft has us taking a DT in round one is beyond me.

Get it out of your heads, WE DO NOT NEED A DT!!!!

Bullsh*t!!!!!!!!!! We need all the interior help we can get!!!!!!!!!! Griffin is always injured and I'm not sold on Anthony Montgomery being the answer. I'm not saying we need to grab a guy in the first round but if Kentwan Balmer is there at #21 you have to take a seroius look...

Remember, T.O., Chad Johnson, Hines Ward, Marques Colston, and Anquan Boldin were all guys taken after the 1st round at the WR position...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DCchillin89

DCchillin89

Posted
Posted
Bullsh*t!!!!!!!!!! We need all the interior help we can get!!!!!!!!!! Griffin is always injured and I'm not sold on Anthony Montgomery being the answer. I'm not saying we need to grab a guy in the first round but if Kentwan Balmer is there at #21 you have to take a seroius look...

Remember, T.O., Chad Johnson, Hines Ward, Marques Colston, and Anquan Boldin were all guys taken after the 1st round at the WR position...

Remember, Reggie Williams, Matt Jones, Rod Gardner, Charles Rogers, Troy Williamson, and Mike Williams were all taken IN the first round at the WR postion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Laxpunk2006

Laxpunk2006

Posted
Posted
And from your sig,you apparently want a WR that may pan out in his 2nd,3rd or 4th year...(Sweed)

May see the field if there's an injury to Moss or El....might have 10-20 catches his 1st season.....then probably pulls a groin in his second year that keeps him sidelined for 1/2 the season.....Then by the time he's in year 3,his contract is up and he's demanding a payraise or he's been traded or released cause he's a lockerroom problem or whatever...?

While Balmer and Jackson earn their starting roles and fortify the front 4 for the next decade...as we go on to win the division and the rest is history...

Nah......I like this draft better than your idea of picking up Sweed or some other WR bust!

I'm sorry but this post is just :laugh:

Using the excuse that a player at position X takes time to develop before becoming a star (or bust) is a horrible reason not to choose a position in the first round. QB's rarely have success their rookie year, I guess we should scratch that off the list if Campbell doesn't work out. DL usually take a year or two to build the upper body strength and technique needed for the pro game. Tell me of the 3 DE's selected in the first round last year who made an immediate contribution? The three combined for 7 sacks last season. Superbowl here we come! Two DT's were selected in the first round, they combined for 48 tackles and 5.5 sacks. Okoye had all 5.5 Harrel played in only 7 games while Okoye played in all 16.

Predicting injuries to a WR while assuming your DL picks will remain healthy their entire career is a fairly immature and unrealistic argument. By year 3 a WR would not be in a contract year, they would likely be halfway through their contract. Demanding a payraise? Maybe if they have achieved some sort of star status, if not contracts are usually backloaded anyway so they should be making plenty to keep tehm happy. What makes a WR automatically a lockerroom problem? I don't see Moss, ARE, Thrash, McCardell, Caldwell, Espy, or Mix complaining. Not all WR's are drama queens, just like not all DL are fat slobs.

I agree that adding to our DL would do wonders for not only our defense but our team as a whole. More pressure could easily lead to more 3 and outs, and more turnovers, which in turn helps our offense. However I don't particularly like this draft. I don't see Balmer or Jackson as being any sort of amazing pro. Jackson has had the pleasure of playing next to Sedric Ellis, we on the other hand do not have that type of player. Balmer is not that type of player.

Just because some WR's bust does not mean every WR drafted in the first round busts out. If this were true don't you think the men being paid very well to scout them would realize this?

Some QB's bust, some OL and DL bust. Every position has busts and stars, thats why the draft is such a crapshoot. You just have to do the best research you can and make an educated GUESS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jesus, Mary & Joe Gibbs

Jesus, Mary & Joe Gibbs

Posted
Posted
I'm sorry but this post is just :laugh:

Using the excuse that a player at position X takes time to develop before becoming a star (or bust) is a horrible reason not to choose a position in the first round. QB's rarely have success their rookie year, I guess we should scratch that off the list if Campbell doesn't work out. DL usually take a year or two to build the upper body strength and technique needed for the pro game. Tell me of the 3 DE's selected in the first round last year who made an immediate contribution? The three combined for 7 sacks last season. Superbowl here we come! Two DT's were selected in the first round, they combined for 48 tackles and 5.5 sacks. Okoye had all 5.5 Harrel played in only 7 games while Okoye played in all 16.

Predicting injuries to a WR while assuming your DL picks will remain healthy their entire career is a fairly immature and unrealistic argument. By year 3 a WR would not be in a contract year, they would likely be halfway through their contract. Demanding a payraise? Maybe if they have achieved some sort of star status, if not contracts are usually backloaded anyway so they should be making plenty to keep tehm happy. What makes a WR automatically a lockerroom problem? I don't see Moss, ARE, Thrash, McCardell, Caldwell, Espy, or Mix complaining. Not all WR's are drama queens, just like not all DL are fat slobs.

I agree that adding to our DL would do wonders for not only our defense but our team as a whole. More pressure could easily lead to more 3 and outs, and more turnovers, which in turn helps our offense. However I don't particularly like this draft. I don't see Balmer or Jackson as being any sort of amazing pro. Jackson has had the pleasure of playing next to Sedric Ellis, we on the other hand do not have that type of player. Balmer is not that type of player.

Just because some WR's bust does not mean every WR drafted in the first round busts out. If this were true don't you think the men being paid very well to scout them would realize this?

Some QB's bust, some OL and DL bust. Every position has busts and stars, thats why the draft is such a crapshoot. You just have to do the best research you can and make an educated GUESS.

We definitely don't need to trade for another secondary player in DeAngelo Hall when we have a glaring weakness up front defensively... I wouldn't mind DT Kentwan Balmer at #21, WR like Devin Thomas in round 2, another D-lineman in round 3 and if we get a compensation pick at the end of round 3 we could go CB... Round 5 we could go after O-line/WR/D-line again... Round 6-7 best athlete available... We could go WR Malcolm Kelly/Limas Sweed round 1 and a guy like DT Trevor Laws in round 2...

Either way I'd be fine...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Laxpunk2006

Laxpunk2006

Posted
Posted
Remember, Reggie Williams, Matt Jones, Rod Gardner, Charles Rogers, Troy Williamson, and Mike Williams were all taken IN the first round at the WR postion...

So were Anthony Gonzalez, Braylon Edwards, Mark Clayton, Roddy White (he had 1200+ and 6 td's in that mess called Atlanta), Larry Fitzgerald, Roy Williams, Lee Evans, Andre Johnson, Santana Moss, Reggie Wayne, Plaxico Burress, Tory Holt, David Boston (he WAS good), as well as plenty of others.

Rod Smith wasn't drafted at all, that doesn't mean we should only pick up FA WR's. Examples can be given for either side of the argument. If you want to name bust WR's anyone of us could just as easily find a list of bust DL, the percentage is probably fairly close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KCJDLJ

KCJDLJ

Posted
Posted
And from your sig,you apparently want a WR that may pan out in his 2nd,3rd or 4th year...(Sweed)

May see the field if there's an injury to Moss or El....might have 10-20 catches his 1st season.....then probably pulls a groin in his second year that keeps him sidelined for 1/2 the season.....Then by the time he's in year 3,his contract is up and he's demanding a payraise or he's been traded or released cause he's a lockerroom problem or whatever...?

While Balmer and Jackson earn their starting roles and fortify the front 4 for the next decade...as we go on to win the division and the rest is history...

Nah......I like this draft better than your idea of picking up Sweed or some other WR bust!

It's dosen't make sense to speculate that Sweed would be sidelined half of his second season and then become a locker room problem his third year. What are you The Amazing Kreskin or something? Any of the players on the mock draft mentioned are just as likely to have the same issues as the ones you prescribe to Sweed. Who's to say Balmer and Jackson won't be busts themselves. Maybe they'll both get drafted by the Redskins and in their first year one will be a total bust and be relagated to special teams and the other will have a nagging ankle injury. This would be at least as likely to happen as what you speculate would happen with Sweed. I'm not an advocate for Sweed or any Rec in the first round. As Vinny said, most of the rec in this draft really aren't worthy of a first rounder but would probably be picked anyway. If the issue isn't resolved in FA then the team should look at the WR position in the second round. It seems to me that the fewest numbers of first round busts occur in the OL position. Those are usually pretty sound picks. The DL bust ratio is high. Most, not all, of the better DL are chosen in the 2-5 rounds. Ideally The team could trade back. That's pretty unlikely but it sure would be nice to P/U another couple of 2's and/or 3's for our 1.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thoth

Thoth

Posted
Posted

I like the positions drafted, not the players. First three picks, all DL/OL. That would be great, but will NEVER happen. Assuming no major FA, I think we'll draft WR, CB, then DE & DT. Not what I want, but I think that's what we'll do. We have 4 major needs: WR, CB, DE, OG, in no order. We have 4 picks in 1st 3 rounds if comp comes through. I think you could try to take best player available, and fill those needs, but. . .we'll probably go glamour again.

I would take a different approach that assumes a two year plan, minimum.

Priority 1: protect Jason Campbell. Stud OG if available, #1 priority. When Kendall or Thomas goes down, who will replace them? No talk about a 5th rounder, etc., an elite talent who can anchor center of OL for a decade.

Priority 2: #1 WR. Moss is inconsistent and injury prone, with him out, we have NOTHING at WR. With no one to throw to, Cambpell will get sacked more.

Priority 3: Another WR. We have Moss & ARE, and maybe Mix. We should draft one more WR, if there is one with talent and potential.

Having receivers that get open so Campbell can dump the ball off is an extension of protection.

I think you have a young QB you are trying to develop, an offense that has floundered for years, and a coach coming in who is an offensive specialist. The D has been steadier.

I think you spend picks on O, and give Campbell EVERY chance to develop by surrounding him with talent. I would have added RT to list, but with Heyer and that 49er, let's see what they do this year, and how Jansen bounces back.

I also think Campbell has been far from stellar, and you need to draft a 3rd string QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...