TrumanB Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Well when Reagan wanted to eliminate the DoE...he got elected President. Well, that wasn't THE reason he was elected president. Of course, there were dozens of reasons why he was elected, including his promise of a smaller government. It sure helped him to have a weak incumbent president in Carter too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancalagon the Black Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Will Ron Paul's campaign get to $12 million by the end of the year? I must admit, watching that count-up on his website is mesmerizing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinzFan007 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 ron paul gmv for sure for rep candidate. not sure itll help him much in getting on the republican card but every vote counts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Will Ron Paul's campaign get to $12 million by the end of the year?I must admit, watching that count-up on his website is mesmerizing. You haven't seen anything yet. Watch it this Sunday the 16th. The "TeaParty". May go up 7 mil in one day. www.teaparty07.com And the blimp will be in DC this Wednesday between 3 and 5 PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsTerps26 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 http://www.ronpaulblimp.com/ the blimp website. Monitors its locations and answers any questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 You haven't seen anything yet. Watch it this Sunday the 16th. The "TeaParty".May go up 7 mil in one day. www.teaparty07.com And the blimp will be in DC this Wednesday between 3 and 5 PM. Such a shame all that money going to waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnLockesGhost Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Such a shame all that money going to waste. I'd rather give my money to a man that at least acknowledges the cliff we're headed for than just roll over and accept another election where both candidates want to push the gas harder. Besides my dollars are worth less and less everyday anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I'd rather give my money to a man that at least acknowledges the cliff we're headed for than just roll over and accept another election where both candidates want to push the gas harder.Besides my dollars are worth less and less everyday anyway. Sure, this country has problems and it always will. But Paul and some of the other candidates would have you believe that we are on the brink of collapse. It's called "the politics of fear". Paul is just as good as Bush in using scare tactics. I think I'll hold onto my money, thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Here's Paul's interview with 20/20, it gets updated daily. Now his foreign policy is discussed. http://www.abcnews.go.com/2020/Stossel/story?id=3978940&page=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Ron Paul Supporters Hack Campaign Finance Law to Send Blimp Aloft http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2007/12/paul_blimp Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul's supporters are set to take off into uncharted political territory this week with the launch of a giant airship that will fly up and down the East Coast advertising their candidate's name.But the Ron Paul blimp project is more that just a way for supporters to win more exposure for the Texas congressman's White House run. It's also a daring end run around U.S. campaign finance laws, and it might set a new course for election fundraising, or blow up like the Hindenburg. "We created a business plan that allows any U.S. citizen to buy as much blimp as they want, without having it count towards their current campaign contributions," reads an explanation on the Ron Paul blimp fundraising site. "This updated legal arrangement offers the best of both worlds, no limits and virtually no regulations." I think this is a bad idea and it has nothing to do with Paul. Who is going to use these tactics next? What if a bunch of billionaires decide they want to get around the laws like this to promote someone you detest? Would that be OK? On a more personal note, this whole Ron Paul thing is kind of creepy to me. It feels too much like a cult. :paranoid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dchogs Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Here's Paul's interview with 20/20, it gets updated daily. Now his foreign policy is discussed.http://www.abcnews.go.com/2020/Stossel/story?id=3978940&page=1 "...what if Canada invades Montana?" RP: "Well, that's a little different. I'm pretty sure Montana could handle things, but we'd give them some help." :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Ron Paul Supporters Hack Campaign Finance Law to Send Blimp Alofthttp://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2007/12/paul_blimp I think this is a bad idea and it has nothing to do with Paul. Who is going to use these tactics next? What if a bunch of billionaires decide they want to get around the laws like this to promote someone you detest? Would that be OK? On a more personal note, this whole Ron Paul thing is kind of creepy to me. It feels too much like a cult. :paranoid: How can you hack a law that doesn't exist? Is there a law that says they can't do this? I've gotten the cult feeling too, its only because everyone hears from the extremely passionate supporters who are really just the minority of his supporters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Sure, this country has problems and it always will. But Paul and some of the other candidates would have you believe that we are on the brink of collapse. It's called "the politics of fear". Paul is just as good as Bush in using scare tactics. I think I'll hold onto my money, thank you very much. The difference is Paul backs himself up with data while Bush just used slogans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 How can you hack a law that doesn't exist? Is there a law that says they can't do this?I've gotten the cult feeling too, its only because everyone hears from the extremely passionate supporters who are really just the minority of his supporters. Campaign finance laws are designed to put limits on how much an individual can donate for good reason. They are using a loophole to skirt the law. Is it legal? Maybe. (I don't know) Is it a good idea? I don't think so. If Ron Paul supporters can do it so can everyone and it opens a floodgate of money, much of it from people who have more influence than you or I already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 The difference is Paul backs himself up with data while Bush just used slogans. You know what they say... "There are lies, damn lies, and statistics." :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Campaign finance laws are designed to put limits on how much an individual can donate for good reason. They are using a loophole to skirt the law. Is it legal? Maybe. (I don't know) Is it a good idea? I don't think so. If Ron Paul supporters can do it so can everyone and it opens a floodgate of money, much of it from people who have more influence than you or I already. I haven't read into this that much, but isn't this the same thing as donating to a PAC, the DNC, or the RNC? They all put out ads as well, they just don't do something this creative. I don't believe any candidate or group could do something like this as well as Paul supporters have, this has been completely a bottom up approach while the others guys would be doing it from the top down. This is the difference between Paul's campaign and Dean's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 The difference is Paul backs himself up with data while Bush just used slogans. Yeah, just like that whole NAU thing. :doh: He'll be done after Super Tuesday anyway, so doesn't really matter what he says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Yeah, just like that whole NAU thing. :doh: He'll be done after Super Tuesday anyway, so doesn't really matter what he says. He has more evidence for the NAU than Bush did for Iraq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 "...what if Canada invades Montana?"RP: "Well, that's a little different. I'm pretty sure Montana could handle things, but we'd give them some help." . . . as soon as we noticed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Campaign finance laws are designed to put limits on how much an individual can donate for good reason. They are using a loophole to skirt the law. Is it legal? Maybe. (I don't know) Is it a good idea? I don't think so. If Ron Paul supporters can do it so can everyone and it opens a floodgate of money, much of it from people who have more influence than you or I already. Mike, I'm struggling to understand what you are concerned with in this. Havnt numerous organized groups sponsored events and promotions for one particular candidate or another for years? I mean, Oprah ust put on a 30,000 person arena event for Obama! The blimp and tea party events are even less troublesome because they arent sponsored by billionaires, they are paid for from an average donation amount of somewhere less than $150 per person, many even just sending $5-$10. To me, that is exactly the kind of real, grassroots support that should excite the politicians regardless of who that support is behind. It means that people actually are starting to care about how our goverment is doing things and using all legal means to get their message accross. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsTerps26 Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Yeah, just like that whole NAU thing. :doh: He'll be done after Super Tuesday anyway, so doesn't really matter what he says. you are getting annoying with your constant bashing. but its a free board, so post away truman, you are really swaying peoples votes away from Ron Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 you are getting annoying with your constant bashing.but its a free board, so post away truman, you are really swaying peoples votes away from Ron Paul He smells of more fear in every post. why troll and bash anything and anyone that is connected to support of the man if you were positve that he didnt have a chance past super tuesday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 He has more evidence for the NAU than Bush did for Iraq. What does Bush's evidence for Iraq have anything to do with Paul and the NAU? You know, it is possible that both of them are wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 What does Bush's evidence for Iraq have anything to do with Paul and the NAU? You know, it is possible that both of them are wrong. Sure, this country has problems and it always will. But Paul and some of the other candidates would have you believe that we are on the brink of collapse. It's called "the politics of fear". Paul is just as good as Bush in using scare tactics. I think I'll hold onto my money, thank you very much. Then I said Paul backs himself up, referring to the market and the money you want to hold onto. Then you brought up the NAU. And yes I know Paul could be wrong, but I'll take solace in the fact that Bush is wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Then I said Paul backs himself up, referring to the market and the money you want to hold onto. Then you brought up the NAU.And yes I know Paul could be wrong, but I'll take solace in the fact that Bush is wrong. Great then, we can at least agree on one thing - Bush was wrong about Iraq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.