CapitalDefense Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This is a ploy, saying to the Skins we want to keep him, when they know that the Redskins will get impatient and give up more for less. Denver will rape us if we do the Bly deal, you watch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ejay183 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Dre Bly does not fit with our D scheme. Dre Bly is not good in run support and is not a good tackler. Smoot isnt great in either, but he throws his body around and plays with fire and passion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooksflow Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I like Bly, but I'm wary. CB's are hot right now in the NFL. Let's just hope the 'Skins don't fumble and give up too much if they're seriously considering Bly's services. Standing pat with a maturing Rogers, a reunited Smoot, a healthy Springs, and a nasty Taylor wouldn't be the worst thing for our secondary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishomelette Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This is a ploy, saying to the Skins we want to keep him, when they know that the Redskins will get impatient and give up more for less. Denver will rape us if we do the Bly deal, you watch! It may be a ploy, but the 'Skins have been supposedly discussing trades with Denver for over a month, and have kept saying no. I don't sense the usual aggressive stance this time. I would guess it will be the boatload of picks as proposed in the WP or nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlass Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 The man wants to come to Washington badly, probably for a pay-day but, I'll give him the benfit of the doubt and say BRING HIM TO WASHINGTON! The guy WANTS to be here, so I figure he'd try harder and play better because he's in a situation he likes. He wants to play for Washington because he had already worked out a contract extension with the Redskins, giving him a big payday. Denver is not going to renogotiate his contract at this time and Bly is gripping over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Im sure everyone on this board is PRAYING that man is still unhappy While I might be not as enthusiastic about getting Bly to the point of praying, I'd certainly want him here, mostly because I really respect the fact that he wants to come to Washington. Perhaps its because he expects a large contract, or perhaps its because he genuinely wants to live close to home, since he's form Virginia, but I still really like that in a guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfanevan Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'm so confused. But this is normal I guess, and I guess thats why I'm so confused. Stuff is usually done a lot quicker here in Skins Country. Oh well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoBob Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 If we can turn our #6 and Springs into: Late #1, #2, #3, #3 and Bly - pull the trigger! One of the 3rd rounders could come from any team willing to trade for Springs, the rest come from Denver. I know that alot of folks would then want to trade up in the 1st, but I would only be willing to dangle one of the 3rd rounders as trade bait. We should keep the #2 if we get it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxSpearheadxX Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I read that article earlier this afternoon. it came out long before the WP article. You still know what I mean though - there was a ton of buzz in the WP before that anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headexplode Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'm not sold on letting Springs go. It seems like he's had some differences with the coaching staff, lately, but I really like him and I think he belongs here in Washington. Now if we could get Bly without getting rid of Springs--well, the more the merrier, I say. Anything's better than our situation last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie5 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This sounds an awful lot like Denver Broncos spin. Wouldn't it enhance your bargaining power to say to the Redskins (or anyone else), "we really have no intention of trading him anytime soon." ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HEavyJumbo85 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Yeah, thank god we don't need a stud rookie DE or anything.:doh: :doh: :doh: The thought of giving up potential high impact D linemen like Anderson, Okoye, or Branch for a couple of likely space fillers just kills me. Oh and don't forget we get an undersized corner who isn't interested in playing run support, misses open field tackles, and obviously just wants a pay day. Sweet deal! I don't think for a minute we'd be giving up a potential high impact lineman. They Redskins if they do this could look to trade up to anywhere between 12 and 14. They are supposedly targeting Okoye. If you can give me 2 teams that want Okoye before the 14th pick that'd be great, but I think he'll still be there unless somebody wants to trade up in front of us. The Redskins want picks, this would give them picks. If Springs doesn't want to be here, this gives them enough leway to trade Springs. I don't know what they're going to do and I'm still holding out hope that Springs will be here, but hey, if they can get picks like they want I'm not going to try and stop it. Everyone complains that they have no draft picks, this gives them draft picks. They also will be in the running for guys like Okoye, Adam Carriker(if they want him), Patrick Willis from Ole Miss and others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I would not give up Betts. He is too valuable to us. If Clinton gets hurt again? If Betts gets hurt. We need TWO great RBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 When does his contract end? He could play out his current one, then sign with Skins as a FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 36 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I want Springs to be here; he's the best CB we currently have. But, if we can get a chunk of picks and an other CB for him, I think we have to consider the offer. In all honesty, I'm not completely sold one way or another on Bly, yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskin48 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I would like to pick him up it would make for some great compitition at the cb position. I have no interest in trading betts though I think that would be a big mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darc Requiem Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 If we can turn our #6 and Springs into:Late #1, #2, #3, #3 and Bly - pull the trigger! One of the 3rd rounders could come from any team willing to trade for Springs, the rest come from Denver. I know that alot of folks would then want to trade up in the 1st, but I would only be willing to dangle one of the 3rd rounders as trade bait. We should keep the #2 if we get it... Our first round pick is worth more than Denver's first, second, and two third round pics combined. Our first rounder equals 1600 points, denvers four picks together equal 1550 points. Now if Denver wanted to cough up Bly, their 1st, 2nd, and two 3rds for our 1st and 5th. I'd think about it. That way if we could move Springs to safety or possibly trade him for an additional pick (Maybe 3rd rounder). That would give us a lot of flexibility, it would give us enough picks to trade back up to a higher spot in the first round, while still having multiple first day picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptChaos86 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I'm still not sold on this, I'd actually prefer to keep Springs and our #6. I am with you. What can Bly do that Smoot or Springs cant? I know Springs is injury prone but when healthy he is really good. So get Springs healthy in the offseason and there is no need for Bly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.