Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Possible Trade Downs (Lots of work Done here)


D-Day

Recommended Posts

On my other skins site I like to visit, FrankenMonkey did an excellent analysis of the available trade down scenarios in this years draft. I thought I would share it with the ES community. All of the trade down scenarios have their true draft point values and he covered some from each team. He did a lot of work on this and I want to thank him as this can help everyone while we are dreaming of trades or picks to come.

Edit: This will also show of us the value of the sixth pick and what we can get for it.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?S=71&F=1348#S=71&F=1348&T=164207

Inspired by another thread, I decided to estimate the possible trade scenarios with virtually every NFL team for the #6 pick (1600 points). This is speculation for the #6 pick alone and doesn't consider the Skins packaging additional picks to even out trades with potential trade partners. Now, in determining the possible trade scenarios, I made a safe assumption that the Skins would be looking to pick up at least one pick somewhere in rounds 2, 3, and 4 (rather than picking up extra picks in 2008 instead). These trade scenarios do not take into account vets being packaged in the deal of course. This is strictly draft picks for the #6 pick. Many of the scenarios are still fairly unrealistic as it require trade partners to give up the bulk of their picks. But hey, it's just to give an idea of the possibilities. It is not meant to imply that any of the trade partners would actually WANT the #6 pick, just what they would have to give up to get the #6 pick.

I ruled out the teams ahead of us in the draft as (I hope) the Skins are not planning to move up in the draft or the teams ahead of us aren't looking to pick up a second top 10 pick. That said, that rules out ARI, CLE, DET, OAK, TB.

I also ruled out BAL, CHI, CIN, DAL, DEN, IND, KC, NYG, NO, PHI, SD, and SEA as they simply do not have enough draft picks (or enough in value) this year to warrant a trade. Essentially, they would have to give us all their 2007 picks and more picks in 2008 to come close to the 1600 points the Redskins #6 pick is worth.

That said, here are the remaining teams that we could do a picks-for-picks deal with...

ATLANTA

Scenario #1

1st (10) - 1300 pts

3rd (75) - 245 pts

4th (117) - 60 pts

1605 points

Scenario #2

1st (10) - 1300 pts

3rd (75) - 245 pts

1545 points

2008 3rd rounder

BUFFALO

Scenario #1

1st (12) - 1200 pts

2nd (43) - 470 pts

1670 points

Scenario #2

1st (12) - 1200 pts

3rd (74) - 220 pts

1440 points

2008 2nd rounder

CAROLINA

Scenario #1

1st (14) - 1100 pts

2nd (45) - 450 pts

5th (145) - 33.5 pts

6th (176) - 22 pts

1605.5 points

Scenario #2

1st (14) - 1100 pts

2nd (45) - 450 pts

1550 points

2008 3rd rounder

GREEN BAY

Scenario #1

1st (16) - 1000 pts

2nd (47) - 430 pts

3rd (78) - 200 pts

1630 points

Scenario #2

1st (16) - 1000 pts

2nd (47) - 430 pts

4th (108) - 78 pts

1508 points

2008 3rd rounder

HOUSTON

Scenario #1

1st (8) - 1400 pts

3rd (73) - 225 pts

1625 points

JACKSONVILLE

Scenario #1

1st (17) - 950 pts

2nd (48) - 420 pts

3rd (79) - 195 pts

5th (140) - 36 pts

1601 points

Scenario #2

1st (17) - 950 pts

2nd (48) - 420 pts

1370 points

2008 2nd rounder

MIAMI

Scenario #1

1st (9) - 1350 pts

3rd (40) - 235 pts

6th (79) - 26 pts

1611 points

MINNESOTA

Scenario #1

1st (7) - 1500 pts

4th (102) - 92 pts

7th (198) - 13.2 pts

1605.2 points

NEW YORK JETS

Scenario #1

1st (25) - 720 pts

2nd (37) - 530 pts

2nd (59) - 310 pts

5th (154) - 30.8 pts

6th (162) - 27.6 pts

1618.4 points

Scenario #2

1st (25) - 720 pts

2nd (37) - 530 pts

2nd (59) - 310 pts

1560 points

2008 4th rounder

Scenario #3

1st (25) - 720 pts

2nd (37) - 530 pts

3rd (89) - 145 pts

1395 points

2008 2nd rounder

NEW ENGLAND

Scenario #1

1st (24) - 740 pts

1st (28) - 660 pts

3rd (91) - 136 pts

4th (123) - 49 pts

6th (187) - 17.6 pts

1602.6 points

Scenario #2

1st (24) - 740 pts

1st (28) - 660 pts

3rd (91) - 136 pts

1536 points

2008 3rd rounder

Scenario #3

1st (24) - 740 pts

1st (28) - 660 pts

1400 points

2008 2nd rounder

PITTSBURGH

Scenario #1

1st (15) - 1050 pts

2nd (46) - 440 pts

3rd (77) - 205 pts

1695 points

Scenario #2

1st (15) - 1050 pts

2nd (46) - 440 pts

4th (20) - 115 pts

5th (146) - 33 pts

6th (177) - 21.6 pts

1608.6 points

Scenario #3

1st (15) - 1050 pts

2nd (46) - 440 pts

2008 3rd rounder

SAN FRANCISCO

Scenario #1

1st (11) - 1250 pts

3rd (76) - 210 pts

4th (100) - 100 pts

4th (120) - 54 pts

1614 points

Scenario #2

1st (11) - 1250 pts

3rd (76) - 210 pts

1460 points

2008 2nd rounder

ST. LOUIS

Scenario #1

1st (13) - 1150 pts

2nd (52) - 380 pts

4th (113) - 68 pts

7th (206) - 10 pts

1608 points

Scenario #2

1st (13) - 1150 pts

2nd (52) - 380 pts

5th (138) - 37 pts

5th (144) - 34 pts

1601 points

Scenario #3

1st (13) - 1150 pts

2nd (52) - 380 pts

1530 points

2008 3rd rounder

TENNESSEE

Scenario #1

1st (19) - 875 pts

2nd (50) - 400 pts

3rd (80) - 190 pts

4th (111) - 72 pts

4th (124) - 48 pts

6th (191) - 16 pts

1601 points

Scenario #2

1st (19) - 875 pts

2nd (50) - 400 pts

3rd (80) - 190 pts

1465 points

2008 2nd rounder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like there are a couple of potential trade partners that would be looking for a RB should Adrian Peterson slip past the Browns. I think this is what we should be rooting for as Houston, New York (both actually), and Green Bay all could be looking for a RB. Buffalo could to should they move McGahee before the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like there are a couple of potential trade partners that would be looking for a RB should Adrian Peterson slip past the Browns. I think this is what we should be rooting for as Houston, New York (both actually), and Green Bay all could be looking for a RB. Buffalo could to should they move McGahee before the draft.

I like where GB sits, about halfway down the 1st round. High enough to get an impact player (Patrick Willis, MLB) or possibly Okoye, DT (if he slips). Plus we'd grab an extra pick or two.

I don't see us trading with a division rival, thus I think NYG are out of the question.:gaintsuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like New England scenario 1 the best

You do realize that there's absolutely NOT A CHANCE IN HELL that the Patriots would ever consumate that deal, right?

The Patriots horde draft picks like ravens horde shiney objects. They do not give them up without good reason and almost never to move UP in a draft. Especially in the first round where moving up means paying a player considerably more money. I feel certain that the "Perfect NFL player" could be there at #6 and there's no way on this earth that Bill Belichick and company would even pick up the phone, knowing it would take that sort of deal to get the #6 pick. That just isn't the way they do business in Foxboro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if MaGahee gets moved & the Browns pass on Peterson, the BUF situation is the most likely to happen.

That being said, it is still likely that we are keeping our pick. I will stille be hoping for Cal Johnson, Peterson or Quinn to slide to us, of course, so someone sitting at #10-15 will get hungry to trade up in a hurry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Houston scenario is very likely considering Quinn may be available at #6, there is a lot of rumbling that they will cut ties with Carr and thay are looking at Plummer as a stopgap.

If Quinn is available at #6, then he is available at #5 and the Cards make a trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It realy depends on how much we want to go down in the draft and who is available when we are drafting. So we will never really know what situation we are in until we are on the clock. Hopefully good management will plot out every possible situation by even including draft day player availability in their pre-determined calculations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Green Bay (scenerio # 1) looks pretty good to me. But I don't want to trade down. It's time we take some studs on that D-line like Branch or Anderson

I agree--we need to start adding difference makers on the D-line. Do you really want to trade down and have Cerrato try and find D-Line value when picking later in the first round? I would rather stay at #6 and get a playmaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...