method man Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 It has become common knowledge that Gregg Williams is probably going to make major changes to his D. His Cover 2 scheme was clearly exposed with big plays down the middle nearly every game. Williams is going to have to adjust. With our personnel, who would you like him to model our new D next year after? I would say the Bears but we lack the skill level, especially on the DLine and at LB, and the ballhawks to make it work. Therefore, I suggest we model our D after the VIKINGS. Although they stunk today, Minny's D has been excellent this year. Their current personnel are similar to ours. On the DL, none of their DEs are very good pass rushers. If we get Branch in the draft, our DT combo would be similar to theirs. At LB, with Rocky now starting, our LB corps's are now comparable. Even in the secondary, if we move Springs to FS and sign Hood to be one of the starting corners, our secondary will be better than theirs in talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uno Boss Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 A professional football team would be fine with me....LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scskin Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 It has become common knowledge that Gregg Williams is probably going to make major changes to his D. His Cover 2 scheme was clearly exposed with big plays down the middle nearly every game. Williams is going to have to adjust. With our personnel, who would you like him to model our new D next year after?I would say the Bears but we lack the skill level, especially on the DLine and at LB, and the ballhawks to make it work. Therefore, I suggest we model our D after the VIKINGS. Although they stunk today, Minny's D has been excellent this year. Their current personnel are similar to ours. On the DL, none of their DEs are very good pass rushers. If we get Branch in the draft, our DT combo would be similar to theirs. At LB, with Rocky now starting, our LB corps's are now comparable. Even in the secondary, if we move Springs to FS and sign Hood to be one of the starting corners, our secondary will be better than theirs in talent. Minn ran the Cover 2 this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smurf85 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 The one he ran 2 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck812 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 We just need an infusion of talent. I think GW defensive Philosophies are still sound and I think that while he may fine tune it with whatever new players come in, it will basically stay the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 just draft young d-line and cbs.. and constant substitution will help this defense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method man Posted January 1, 2007 Author Share Posted January 1, 2007 just draft young d-line and cbs.. and constant substitution will help this defense It is not that simple. Over the course of the season, I saw nearly all of the big passing plays come across the middle. It did not matter who our SS was. They all came in the middle. Collinsworth also showed other problems with the scheme yesterday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 He should model the defense for the best players on his defense. But he's too arrogant to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotalRecall Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Well, the fact that he couldn't make the necessary changes DURING the season should tell you he should be fired. Let's see how long it would take him to make his changes when he's unemployed!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
909997 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 stop the run make teams pass and blitz and get TURNOVERS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slateman Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Something that works . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Well, the fact that he couldn't make the necessary changes DURING the season should tell you he should be fired. Let's see how long it would take him to make his changes when he's unemployed!!! Oh come on, you know the whole problem was Adam Archuletta. Even once he was benched his aura made the defense stink. Gregg Williams' scheme is perfect. He can do no wrong. It was all AA's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NVskinsfan Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 How about the defense modeled after Baltimore..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method man Posted January 1, 2007 Author Share Posted January 1, 2007 stop the run make teams passand blitz and get TURNOVERS That is what good D's like Chicago's does. We need to get the personnel for this, however. At the very minimum, we should move Springs to FS to take care of center field duties, so ST can focus on getting picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 It is not that simple. Over the course of the season, I saw nearly all of the big passing plays come across the middle. It did not matter who our SS was. They all came in the middle. Collinsworth also showed other problems with the scheme yesterday that happens when u cant bring pressure and also need to help your corners in coverage.. get alan branch and he will defintely open up stuff for our LBs. when you have ade jimoh, kenny wright and other street bums, thats what happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method man Posted January 1, 2007 Author Share Posted January 1, 2007 How about the defense modeled after Baltimore..... We don't have the personnel for a 3-4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsand521 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 The one he ran 2 years ago. Damn you beat me to it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve57 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Tackling 101. Maybe he can get some local high school kids to come by and show them how it's done, since the coaches seem unable to communicate something simple like locking them up. Start with the little things. What the Offense does, what the Defense should do. Or they could just fire the guy and start fresh. From the bottom you can only go up. Hopefully w/o GW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxwarrior Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 I think if we get another DB to see a more agressive defense next season. One where the blitzing comes from more angles. I also expect less help from the safeties as they will be more involved in the run game and blitzing. Basically, I see more 46 looks, but still use cover 2 etc. I see way more looks to keep teams confused. The biggest change I expect will not come from GW, but from Joe Gibbs. I see a more physical style coming to the Skins on both sides of the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 We don't have the personnel for a 3-4. Baltimore doesn't use the 3-4 as their base defense anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldfan Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 We don't have the personnel for a 3-4. We don't have the personnel for the 4-3 either. Carter is a 'tweener who fits the 3-4 OLB better than the 4-3 DE. If we stay in the 4-3 we need a MLB. If we go to the 3-4, we need a NT, so that's a wash. The advantage of the 3-4 is that the offense has to guess which LB will be rushing the passer. The more unpredictable the scheme, the less talent needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method man Posted January 1, 2007 Author Share Posted January 1, 2007 We don't have the personnel for the 4-3 either. Carter is a 'tweener who fits the 3-4 DE better than the 4-3.If we stay in the 4-3 we need a MLB. If we go to the 3-4, we need a NT, so that's a wash. The advantage of the 3-4 is that the offense has to guess which LB will be rushing the passer. The more unpredictable the scheme, the less talent needed. 3-4 DEs are usually as big as one gap DTs. Carter definitely isn't that big. If you mean 3-4 OLB, Carter played that at the end of his SF career and he wasn't too good at it. We need a new MLB whether it is 3-4 or 4-3 so we definitely have the personnel for a 4-3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldfan Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 3-4 DEs are usually as big as one gap DTs. Carter definitely isn't that big. If you mean 3-4 OLB, Carter played that at the end of his SF career and he wasn't too good at it. We need a new MLB whether it is 3-4 or 4-3 so we definitely have the personnel for a 4-3 Maybe Carter isn't that great in either scheme. A MLB in the 3-4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method man Posted January 1, 2007 Author Share Posted January 1, 2007 Maybe Carter isn't that great in either scheme. A MLB in the 3-4? He has been good lately in this 4-3 defense. 4 sacks in the past 5 weeks. There is no way he has enough pass coverage skills to be a MLB in the 3-4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldfan Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 He has been good lately in this 4-3 defense. 4 sacks in the past 5 weeks. There is no way he has enough pass coverage skills to be a MLB in the 3-4 Sorry, I should have separated those two lines. I wasn't suggesting that Carter would play the position. I was noting that there isn't a MLB in the 3-4, so I'm not sure what you meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.