#1SkinsFan Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2365504 Redskins add Randle El to receiving corps Randle El had a career-low 35 receptions for the Super Bowl champion Steelers in 2005 but in four seasons has established himself as one of the game's most versatile performers. While he is no doubt more famous for his 43-yard touchdown pass in the fourth quarter of Super Bowl XL than any of his 162 career catches or five return touchdowns, the Redskins signed him to be their No. 2 receiver, opposite Moss. Washington apparently plans to employ a lot of three-receiver looks next season, with former Rams and Chiefs offensive coordinator Al Saunders calling the plays. wow, i thought Lloyd would be the #2 guy? Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chow184 Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 just speculation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manichispanic Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 im assuming we'll pretty much have 3 starting wrs in this new o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 When you have 3 WR's on the field. Does it matter? If we just got the ball back after a punt or kick return. Randel El might need a play or two off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USDsk8ter123 Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 there will probley be 3 recievers out there half the time so im sure the #3 will get his touches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIDETHEWALRUS Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 The #2 slot is completely up in the air right now. We will have to wait until training camp to see if someone distinguishes themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dent19 Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 I dont think it will matter who's #1-2 or 3 if all three are in the game. For the first time i think FUN-N-GUN has a chance in DC....... Picture Moss, El, Lloyd, Cooley and Patten......WOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Adama Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 Pure speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1SkinsFan Posted March 13, 2006 Author Share Posted March 13, 2006 After training camp, hopefully the WR lineup is: #1: Moss #2: Lloyd #3: Randle-El And Randle-El will be KR/PR. He will get his touches and our offense will be clicking! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Kenzo Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 just speculation My exact thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterPinstripe Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 As of right now, we can not be sure where he or loyd will play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alaadin123 Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 Well who's going to be on the throwing end of those balls is what I want to know??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrunellSuperbowl Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 David Patten has to be cut right? I mean with the three recievers and Cooley there is no room for him. Unless we run 5 wide out sets or 4 wide out. I think Thrash and Jacobs maybe 4th and 5th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 I dont think it will matter who's #1-2 or 3 if all three are in the game. For the first time i think FUN-N-GUN has a chance in DC.......Picture Moss, El, Lloyd, Cooley and Patten......WOW! No need to tax your mind....look below - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 You say alot of thing to a player when he is in town to sign him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovetoaster Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 im assuming we'll pretty much have 3 starting wrs in this new o Yep, a lot of three wides next year. Our offense could be scary, giving Saunders these weapons. This is a much better WR corp than he had at KC, and we all know the numbers that they were capable of. Granted they had Tony Gonzalez and Priest Holmes/Larry Johnson which are just a shade better IMHO than Portis and Cooley. But we'll see, their games will probably be helped by the new addidions as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frediemac Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 I just want to like'n this to Gilbert Arenas. He is Young and coming into his own and he's on our Team. Young and Up and coming. BABY...HAIL TO THE REDSKINS! FIGHT FOR OLD DC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Money Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 GV you forgot an olinemen in your signature! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovetoaster Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 No need to tax your mind....look below - Is it just me, or do you only have one guard on your diagram? Or was that on purpose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballGuy2677 Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 They will battle for the position in training camp probly...but i think Brandon Lloyd will win it though they should both see similiar playing time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrunellSuperbowl Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 GV you forgot an olinemen in your signature! :laugh: you are a troll. You have posted the same thing 1,000 times. Leave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1SkinsFan Posted March 13, 2006 Author Share Posted March 13, 2006 No need to tax your mind....look below - LOL at your sig with NO CENTER on the o-line. :laugh: I wish we could start 12 giys so all of our recievers had a chance. Oh well. We might run 5 wide with no RB in the backfield. Or 4 wide w/ Portis in the backfield and no Cooley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrunellSuperbowl Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 Randel EL is Dante Hall for Saunders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 GV you forgot an olinemen in your signature! :laugh: Give me my fantasy you kill joy. Blah..Blah...sure this is illegal w/o the left guard......but I'm sure Cooley could swing over and cover if the zebras notice. Think outside the box KB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elkabong82 Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 It's just speculation. Lloyd will be #2, El #3. El himself said he is going to be the kick returner, and I don't think we would put our #2 receiver in that kind of danger. Besides, El is tougher than Lloyd and would be better suited going over the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.