kingdaddy Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I remember Sean Taylor seeing some snaps on offense this year. Why haven't we seen that again? With our WR situation, maybe he could be a new look for the defense to have to deal with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosher Ham Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Seemed to be more of a decoy than anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 36 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I don't know. Just because he is a big hitter doesn't mean he can take a big hit. I would hate to have him get injured or re-aggrivate his previous injury by playing a decoy. We NEED him on defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazhog Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Yea, I forgot about Taylor on Offense... Good idea! Nice little change for this game!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DixieFlatline Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 It'll pop up at the most opportune moment. He doesn't need to be in there all the time, but I believe Gibbs still has some surprises for people in the playoffs (he always does) and this could be one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgjk9 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 im sure we'll see some kidna trick play or some little wrinkle in there this week. gibbs has to have something up his sleeve to make this offesne go. im sure that hes thought of a gameplan though and that the offesne will be much improved from last week, so long as brunell's knee is ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wewantdallas Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Yeah i had forgotten about this also. Was reminded of this when I think I saw Julius Peppers playing wr for carolina. Maybe brunell isn't great at throwing the jump ball; remember ramsey was projected as the starter when we had plans for taylor on offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-mando- Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 taylor should be out goaline back...and our kicker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinstzar Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I thin Gregg Williams spit on Joe Gibbs for suggesting the idea again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DButz65 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I thin Gregg Williams spit on Joe Gibbs for suggesting the idea again. LAME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Novaskin Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Taylor lined up inside the redzone would be great, but Sellers, Cooley and Royal are Gibbs first bigman options. We need a taller reciever for next year to compliment Santana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins n' Bones Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I could see it in a red zone situation if we are behind late in the game, and we need the TD to go ahead or tie....he probably would still be a decoy, but it could throw their D off just enough... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Its been delayed due to Taylor Jacobs chaining himself to the bedpost at the idea of playing safety in Sean's stead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.