carex

designated to return is no longer a thing. There's two returns and it can be anyone who goes on IR during the season. We could sign Quick back and/or bring up Cobb, but unless Harris is also still out I think we might just make one move and skip IR, instead releasing someone like Josh Keyes. As for the teams issue, if we do keep them on the active roster they would be on the inactive list, allowing guys like Perine and Adonis Alexander to suit up and take the spots on teams

gimme a riot

not a fan of that shade of gold on the 9ers, don't want it on us

I think that might be a non starter with the Chiefs having an arrowhead logo

I like the pants and the helmet actually the jersey isn't quite right though

why else do you need? How about some effort. That jersey looks like a t-shirt with a number slapped on it. It's boring. Give me bright colors, I like things loud

not to my eyes. I mean I guess that burgundy is okay, but the gold? Ugly as hell. Of course to me, that's closer to mustard yellow, but I don't think of French's mustard as mustard yellow, I tend to think of Dijon mustards as closer to actual mustard color

In fact that's about how often we saw it in the old days, The problem is the home team always chooses the color. If we choose white on red at home, and then most of our opponents choose to wear their color jersey in their home game we'll almost never wear the burgundy jersey. In fact, during Gibbs 1 it got the the point we only saw it when we played the Cowboys in Texas Stadium

I won't argue the white and yellow is terrible, but so is the burgundy jersey/white pants. It's just boring as hell

the yellow pants are great. the white pants are boring as hell, I hope we never go back to them

Cowboys are making their third string QB into their QB coach

I never liked the white pants. They were just boring to me

no it's not, we need some gold jerseys.

I saw no evidence Snyder was interested in changing the unis until Bruce suggested it Honestly, I'm not a fan of Color Rush as is, it's kind of to much of a good thing. The pants worn with the various uniforms frequently look weird to me with the way they're striped or sometime aren't striped. But I love the Gold jersey and think it would be incredible paired with the Burgundy pants As for options I feel like Allen might say that the yellow against white would be to hard for color blind people to tell which team was which, though I don't know if that's true. He might also suggest Burgundy on Burgundy since we have worn that before

Dallas Color Rush have been all white in the past so I don't think all white is an option

so, we've got two Thursday games coming up. Will the Skins be able to wear their proposed color rush unis for either? Last year the late Thanksgiving game didn't require Color Rush rules. And Dallas I think has white color rush and I'm not sure how yellow would look compared to that

on the touchback thing, the ref ruled he'd touched the line before the ball got there, which basically makes him unable to touch it without it being a touchback

so they called the grounding because Payton complained. He knew there wold be a ten second run off. If a player tries to steal time from the other team get called for delay of game and penalized. Coaches after two minutes should get the same

white pants stink. They're plain and boring. But I love the burgundy jerseys

well, depending on the population either can, but for you personally switching parties every election is just voting against the you of a few years before and insuring previous work will be undone

they don't acknowledge them because there's not enough people on each side who combine those two opinions to shift the party platform well, there's a reason that's a mistake, unless you like gridlocked government. Te two sides dislike each others policies so much right now, that switching out repeatedly just means they next Congress and Pres spends their time undoing what the previous one did

oh really? People against gay marriage but for a strong social safety net because of what the bible says about sex and about caring for people have moral reasons for each but have to pick a side because current orthodoxy in the US parties put those moral issues on opposite sides meanwhile people for gay marriage because it's not the government's business but against the strong safety net because they believe any large gov't will go wrong and hurt people are also deciding something for moral reasons but have to make a decision

more likely they decide what they believe then pick out the party, there only being two significant parties in the US has narrowed it down to if one party believes one thing the other belives the opposite in most cases where there's a question. Of course the two people who vote may not lockstep with each party, but then you just have to prioritize

well, if both sides believe they're morally right, why shouldn't they feel that way?

I don't think the Wizards can trade their 2018 first rounder since they traded their 2017 pick