wit33

Might be a competitive edge if you secure one of the lone defensive minds that provides a chance against all the nerdy OCs and offensive head coaches. His defense recovered well and showed up under the bright lights in the AFC championship game. His throwing motion is intriguing, especially when considering his potential to consistently make the elementary throws that an OC frequently schemes. Unlike many elite dual-threat players with awkward or inconsistent throwing motions, Daniels seems to have a smoother approach, raising hopes for accuracy on basic throws. However, the true test of his processing abilities and adaptation will only be revealed in live game situations. He's already on track to elevate a team's run offense to a top-5 level, but if he can combine that with consistent accuracy on strategically designed throws, that adds an intriguing dimension and an elevated floor.

Uncover more layers, as there's much more to explore: - #4 scoring offense - Gus Edwards with 13 rushing TDs (considered an average RB for Baltimore) - #8 in time of possession - #4 in team rushing touchdowns - #1 in rushing yards per game Set aside personal bias, embrace the numbers, and let new perspectives unfold. You're welcome. He needs to improve self-protection, and it's frustrating that he lacks a baseball slide, a skill often mastered. Despite this, what makes him intriguing is his apparent good spatial awareness and attributes that enable him to avoid significant hits, especially along the sidelines. Absolutely, the allure of a high floor and immediate impact from a great to elite dual-threat QB is undeniable. The elite ones tend to avoid busts and offer significant returns, particularly during their rookie contracts. Whether they can win a SB like Russell Wilson or get to one like Kaepernick, Newton or Hurts is another story. Completely agree regarding Lamar's skill in avoiding hits; he's essentially a QB with RB-like skills and awareness. I'm fascinated by Daniels' throwing mechanics in comparison to other elite dual-threat players. I envision him thriving in a Ben Johnson-type offense, consistently making the kind of throws Goff has executed in recent seasons. Daniels appears capable of bringing instant rhythm to an offense, especially with scripted plays and fundamental passes that make up a substantial portion (50-70%) of throws in a game. Generally, the elite dual threat guys must provide rhythm through the run game, play action, and screen game. Your thoughts? Say it louder so the back can hear it. I also compared Lamar’s regular season winning to Peyton (post his rookie season). Peyton….51-29 Lamar…..58-19

The notion of "Super Bowl or bust" doesn't entirely capture your perspectives expressed over the last couple of seasons, but that's something for you to address. Relying on a Super Bowl as a crux weakens about 95% of debates to support your viewpoint. Disregarding an MVP is notable; it seems there are blinders on when it comes to evaluating Jackson.

SB winner lol Continue to move the goalposts while he likely secures his second MVP.

Your position on Lamar coming into the season was dumb. Wilson's superpower lies in his legs. The early career comparisons hold somemerit, considering that his legs were the primary factor contributing to his impact during the initial years of his rookie contract. Wilson possesses an elite deep ball, but he tends to be below average in most other aspects of throwing the football. The game plan remains consistent for both him (when Wilson was willing to run) and similar quarterbacks – keep them in the pocket and challenge them to throw from there. This scouting report has been a constant throughout Wilson's entire career. Dude is below average from the pocket, as is Jackson.

No, he’s below average and always has been below average in the pocket.

Russel Wilson would like a word. I assume the Ravens are content with the return on investment (ROI) with Jackson. Being economical in certain aspects with an MVP QB is par for the course. Having Jackson as your QB in one of the most competitive sports virtually guarantees a 70-75% win rate, and considering the myriad variables involved in securing a victory in the NFL that’s unreal. Hes the Peyton Manning of the regular season. Let’s see if the chips fall his way and his team can pull out a SB one of these years. Ravens got away from their true identity on offense and passed the ball too much. The play caller appeared to panic when hit the mouth by two early scores from the Chiefs offense. Zay Flowers fumbled at the goal line. Lamar could’ve been better.

Don't most great quarterbacks face challenges or get bogged down in the playoffs and fall short of winning Super Bowls? However, I want to emphasize that I don't align with the belief that a Super Bowl victory is the sole determinant of a quarterback's value from season to season.

This is a similar fate most great QBs face year in and year out. It’s not only reserved for the elite dual threat guys.

Greg Roman wins that game, just saying

Truthfully, not many QBs secure Super Bowls, and I find it to be a somewhat lazy metric. However, in today's game where many quarterbacks can run, Purdy's three second-half runs proved to be game-changers, setting him apart from Goff.

I notice impressive twitch and agility in J. Daniels, not quite elite like Jackson, but not too far off. Early on, I hesitate to compare him to RG3 in terms of running, as RG3 lacked the quick movements and lateral agility. Daniels excels at avoiding hits near the sideline, but shows hesitancy when navigating between or near the hashes, lacking the ease of sliding and finding open spaces in the middle of the field. I wouldn't be surprised if Daniels' short-area speed measurements are on par with or close to Jackson's. Indeed, I've been on this tangent for a decade emphasizing the value of an elite dual-threat player. However, the league's increasing athleticism at that position has somewhat diminished the value of such players. It's noteworthy that elite dual-threat individuals drafted in the first round seldom disappoint.

Ron fits being a coordinator—Could see him crush it in this role. Be in the background and worry about connecting with 20-30 defensive players and that be it.

The gravy train seems to be ending for these mediocre QBs. Kudos to Mike McDaniel for his bold approach, having the confidence to generate 30 TDs and 4500 yards without shelling out exorbitant money for this tier of QB. High salaries paid to QBs is one the biggest NFL heists of the last 15 years. This is an offensive head coach (Mike McDaniel) potentially providing elite level returns if he can generate similar offensive production with a rookie or modestly paid veteran. Why wouldn’t you get Ryan Tannenhill for $10-12mil. The weakest move is for an offensive coach to spend ridiculous money on a mediocre QB to secure average returns. Fascinated to see how hat happens with Jordan Love as well.

The resurgence of his leadership style in the NFL is noticeable, with Dan Campbell leading the way and the recent inclusion of Antonio Pierce. Trends in the league often follow cyclical patterns. In line with your observation, players might not immediately rally to his defense, but building genuine rapport takes time, often linked to financial rewards. It's likely that players like Wylie and Pringle, who potentially benefited financially, have a positive view of him.

Completely on board with going against the norm and bringing in a defensive coordinator (DC) who offers a potential schematic advantage in the playoffs. Macdonald demonstrated a comparable impact to that of an elite quarterback in yesterday's game against the high-flying Texans by effectively shutting them down. I support the idea of maintaining a defensive schematic edge for the next two decades while hoping to secure an elite quarterback, thereby diminishing the significance of an offensive coordinator (OC). Not suggesting that this is the sole model. I'm fully aligned with the concept that in an organization, elite leadership and intangibles reign supreme when it comes to a coach. Unlikely due to his strong personality, but if he clearly communicates that he's done as a head coach, there could be some potential value. This is contingent on Daniels being the pick for me. Greg Roman would be a stellar hire if Daniels is the pick. It's amusing how he gets criticized for being a trailblazer in the NFL, especially considering the current Ravens OC receiving all the credit.

If Jayden Daniel’s is the pick, 100% entertain it.

To this day, I'm not sure I've seen a quarterback secure the edge quite like he did before his injury. I'm not commenting on his overall ability; it's just the way he navigated in a straight line was exceptional. His track experience truly stood out on the football field – almost as if he were launching from the starting blocks in a track meet. Post injury, the edge was no longer his ally.

Not a bad connection made here by Colin: https://sports.yahoo.com/colin-cowherd-claims-bears-firing-212850287.html

Get Jay a national gig, networks are sleeping on a potential star. He’d be fantastic with Pat Mcafee

The NFL is remarkably unpredictable unless you have an elite Hall of Fame QB or Kyle Shanahan. If someone claims otherwise, their ego might be clouding their judgment. Hope Washington can become an outlier as well. Maybe Peters is that outlier!

10000% This has consistently been my argument – money, power, and the length of the contract are significant factors. It's why I never discounted Dan in negotiations, and he demonstrated that repeatedly over the years. My concern is, if a first-time coach is pursuing those aspects, it could be potentially risky. Even if he’s considering that it could be a red flag 🚩 as you like to put it. Frequently, that's the dynamic of the business. In many instances, wielding this type of power often involves securing compensation for multiple family members as well.

If the coach is aiming for complete control, I'll decline that proposition anyway. Opting for Washington over the Panthers, especially if absolute power is offered, will speak volumes about the individual. I assume the financial aspect will be comparable in both locations. Perhaps Tepper deviates from the norm and provides more than 5 years guaranteed.

To be clear, no interest in Howell. It’s January, deal with it lol

Yes indeed and 8-12 rushing tds. He doesn’t seem to align with the expectations you have for him. Not every individual fits neatly into a specific mold. Despite concerns about potential injuries this year, he remained completely injury-free throughout the entire season. Squeeze every ounce of talent out of all players, QBs included (especially while getting paid peanuts on a rookie deal—win at all costs). For him to reach his full potential his dual threat abilities needed to be featured heavily. Whats the point with a team dropping back a 6’0 foot QB and keeping him in the pocket if plenty 6’3 plus can do that—must be dynamic at his size. I disagree; with this mindset, he most likely will not rise above mediocrity. He could likely serve as a backup and situational starter for over 10 years, earning $30 million or more in his career, which does come with financial benefits. Mediocrity can change the financial landscape for future generations, and I understand that. However, as a fan, I’m selfish and indifferent to those financial considerations; I want to support a team with an all-out approach. Watch his North Carolina videos; even with limited opportunities, he demonstrated the ability to execute similar runs in the NFL. EB and Ron wiffed big time not leaning heavily into his dual threat ability.