wit33

I hope some retired elite dual-threat QBs start breaking down film and sharing their perspectives, or maybe I just haven't come across it yet. We definitely need much more diversity in analyzing these dudes, and it would be great to hear from GMs who've had success with this running QBs.

Haha. I would love to hear Galdi break down the trenches. Hes too much on the nerdy analytics side for me, but he’s often in my rotation if I get to a lot of listening hours in a week. I appreciate how prepared and professional he is. Get ready for a lot of tough guy talk from DQ; it's about to become the staple of the franchise moving forward. Football is emotional, filled with self-serving individuals, and plenty of tough guy talk. If you were in a locker room, your head would likely explode. Haha

I understand; he doesn't deviate much from what he sees as the fundamental pillars for winning football games in the NFL. It may not always align with the current desires of some fans. Fortunately, there are plenty of commentators out there offering a wealth of shiny stats and analytics. Haha, even better! My favorite duos discussing Washington football these days are Sheehan and Doc, Sheehan and Standig, and Paulsen and Hoffman. You might literally explode if you listen to both Sheehan and Doc together lol

Doc catches a lot of flak for his commentary lol He’s one of my favorite Washington media personalities.

Doc has been consistently advocating the need for change within the franchise for over 30 years, highlighting the enduring issues. However, our fans dismiss this perspective. Fans of teams like the Steelers and Ravens would resonate with his messaging, as those organizations emphasize the process, hard work, and dominating opponents. However, fans dismiss his perspective because it doesn't rely heavily on analytics or whatever. Comparatively, Galdi's approach is akin to Stephen A. Smith discussing football; while he's well-prepared and focused on stats and analytics, he lacks depth, nuance, and a comprehensive understanding, in my opinion. I speculate that Doc, for the first time in a long while, will be over the moon about the values, team principles, expectations, culture, and identity embraced by the front office and coaches. My guess is that Quinn will echo similar language used by Doc quite frequently. Football dudes through and through, looking to take down the nerdy OCs most around these parts wanted!

Measurables don’t align. Fuller fits the same timeline as most of the dudes the FO signed.

It seems the influence of Adam Peters during his time with the Niners, where linebackers were highly valued, might be shaping the approach of this FO. I'm intrigued to see how this regime values the linebacker position moving forward and witness firsthand its impacts on game to game!

Develop your youth behind these dudes as well. Great deal of attention is put on how to develop QBs and such, but much of the same applies to other positions as well.

Adjust your calendar.

Only in this fan base would some argue that Mariota is closer to Maye than Daniels as a comparison, which is pretty wild. It seems like some people are really losing it over their preference for one guy over the other. I'm fully on board with Daniels as my preference, but I'm also in a total honeymoon phase with the front office and trust whatever decision they make.

Running backs are proving to be the best bang for your buck in the market right now, and it's evident today. Teams known for their well-run operations are eagerly snagging these players.

Quarterbacks aren't just about making plays on the field – they've got to hustle off it too. Working hand in hand with their teams, they've got to be savvy with the cash to build and maintain a winning squad. It's not just about throwing touchdowns; it's a financial playbook for long-term success. Patrick Mahomes and Josh Allen chose to invest in and anchor themselves with their franchises, aiming for consistent long-term success. Just think about it – if these guys had signed 2-3 year guaranteed deals, the potential money they could rake in would be staggering. It's a partnership until it's not, and eventually, it might become as transactional as NBA superstar dealings. It's not about right or wrong, just not my preference.

I've caught him in games against Washington and a few on national TV. He just moves differently. Not really pushing hard for the guy, and I doubt our front office leans that way in year 1 of building their team. Still, my expectations are to be in the wild card mix from the get-go. Barkley paired with Brob is intriguing, especially with a rookie QB expected to start day 1. But I hear you on the risks and if you feel he’s not looked special in recent seasons. A lot of money will be spent, should be a fun free agent season.

Incredibly cost-effective considering their potential impact on a season. This will soon become a trending topic—the veteran RB's value reaching its trough, presenting a significant buying opportunity in today's market. Somewhat confident that the new front office is actively seeking ways to gain a competitive edge, rather than nostalgically adhering to methods employed by the 75% of mediocre NFL franchises whether that involves picking up Barkley or not. Peters might be considering the MVP-level impact that a player like Christian McCaffrey brought to the Niners with a young QB. Yes, Barkley is that talented to be compared to Mccafrey. The timeline probably doesn't sync with Barkley being a target for this regime, unless they aim to support Daniels or Maye by adding a premier backfield talent proficient in pass protection. It's plausible that the front office may see the value in acquiring a veteran center and a seasoned running back to assist a young QB on a play-by-play basis.

lol… To clarify, I don't anticipate it, but I could support the Front Office if they opt to build an elite backfield for their rookie QB, taking the risk on a talented RB in his age 27 and 28 seasons. Own the risk, but acquiring elite talent is my weakness, regardless of position. Investing in elite RB talent has minimal cap implications, so even in the unfortunate event of a knee injury, you're dealing with a player consuming only 3.5 to 5% of the team's overall cap, likely off the books by year 3. I can easily envision a top 5 rushing attack with Jayden Daniels, utilizing a mix of BRob and Barkley. Alternatively, it could provide reliable support for a QB like Drake Maye as he navigates the intricacies of the game.

I support Wilson only if there's a decrease in entitlement, and he acknowledges the need to strive for over 500 rushing yards in the season to truly impact the QB position. Again, only if Maye or Daniels aren’t loved by the FO.

Now is the moment to acquire Russell; he remains the same player as two years ago, but at a significantly reduced cost. It's a strategic move—buy at the trough, sell at the peak. Considering if Washington's leadership isn't committed to Maye or Daniels, I can easily support bringing in a cost-effective and more grounded Wilson who now recognizes the importance of using his legs for effectiveness. Additionally, there should be an exit option after the first year. Committing to that individual for two years seems too much; it's essential for the organization to maintain leverage. No way do I want this, hope the FO loves either Maye or Daniels.

In this ongoing discussion about dual-threat quarterbacks, I’ve clarified my preference for athletic freaks across all positions, QB included. I'm open to discovering the next Aaron Rodgers or Patrick Mahomes, but what truly distinguishes them is their exceptional minds. Predicting whether a player will be an elite processor at the QB position is challenging. A 4.6-4.7 40-yard dash doesn't strike me as freakish speed in the NFL. When compared to peers like Jones, Tannehill, Carr, Wilson, Herbert, Smith, and Love, all with similar speed, it doesn't give me the impression that Washington will have a QB with extraordinary athleticism. Do you feel that when you’ve watched these guys with comparable speed and size? We’re delving into different tiers of dual-threat QBs, and while you believe most are dual threats, I agree but also see varying levels of proficiency. This is akin to evaluating RBs based on their spatial awareness, explosiveness, and ability to manipulate defenders in open space etc.. I agree that most QBs possess dual-threat ability in the NFL. The speed at the QB spot is on a constant rise, and it might just blow your mind eventually! Similarly to Lamar Jackson winning a second MVP— what a freak! I hope the front office commits substantial funds to incoming free agents. The group appears well-organized and ready for both the present and the future. Now, let's go execute.

It's the perfect moment for a middle-tier team to make a move for Wilson. His value is currently at its nadir, and his next team will likely secure him at a lower cost, setting the stage for potential gains beyond expectations. If his mindset is in the right place and seems to be imbued with a greater sense of gratitude. However, obviously no way Washington should do it! 4.6 40 is an average athlete in the NFL. Everything Maye does, 80% of the starters can and will do in the NFL from a play and run extension. Not saying he won’t prove to be elite at backyard football or become the smartest QB in the league, but not too excited about the prospects of him outwitting the 5-10 year veterans within his rookie contract. Freaks don't need the amalgamation of two seasons to showcase their prowess. I unapologetically embrace my bias towards exceptional talents and find it disconcerting when a quarterback of average athleticism grapples with accuracy issues of any kind being drafted in the top 5. I appreciate his versatility of being a multi-sport athlete and excelling in backyard football though.

Elite dual-threat quarterbacks often make an immediate impact, showcasing their ground skills from the first game of their rookie contract. While this is a significant advantage, the downside lies in the increased risk of injuries. Game 1, Daniels appears poised to match the impact of quarterbacks ranked 8-25. However, Drake Maye's progress depends on mastering the playbook and outsmarting quarterbacks like Kirk Cousins before stepping into competition with the elite. In contrast, Jalen Hurts faced challenges with pocket passing, throws outside the hashes, and reading the field. Despite these difficulties, he still competed, and his running prowess played a significant role in outperforming Patrick Mahomes in the Super Bowl. I'm not dismissing Drake Maye, but from my layman perspective, he doesn't seem to offer an immediate advantage on day one. The key for him lies in becoming the smartest and fastest at reading the field, which, while interesting and can happen, doesn't inspire much confidence in my view. Physical Freaks! This is the way!

This FO was a part of trading assets and rewarding a RB with the biggest contract in history for a RB. Not at all saying it should happen, but the RB market has great value these days.

While not overly optimistic, I don't dismiss the idea of investing in an elite, game-changing RB during the ages of 27 and 28. Hoping the analytics team explores emerging arbitrage opportunities, perhaps in the veteran RB market. Conforming to cliché analytics leads to falling behind; let's embrace innovation, take calculated risks, and stay ahead of the curve – akin to Shen's recent comments relating to the TE position. A little thunder and lightning - 70/30 split/situational. Not a strict either-or situation, but I'm a sucker for elite talent. If the team secures an elite RB for $25 million guaranteed over 2 years in his upcoming 27 and 28 year old seasons, count me intrigued. You don’t have to sign these dudes to 4-5 year contracts. I'm not insisting it should happen, but acquiring elite talent for 4% of the cap could offer substantial ROI, compared to spending the same amount on an average O-lineman, CB, or edge player – not the most appealing option.

Investing in an elite RB presents a prime financial opportunity in today's NFL landscape. Chances are, there won't be a need to venture into a third year of guaranteed funds. Not saying it should be some sort of slam dunk, but the potential ROI for the cost is intriguing, especially coupled with a rookie QB.

Always prioritize evaluating freak talents, especially when your team lacks one in a specific position. Saquon Barkley stands out as such a talent. Limit Barkley to two years guaranteed (overpay for those two years), ensuring strong support for your rookie QB with an elite RB. Barkley was Christian Mccafrey to Daniel Jones two seasons ago.

Standig and Sheehan is my favorite listen on radio these days. The astonishing part is, despite thorough background research from grade school to college, evaluations can still go wrong. Teams should, however, be adept at identifying individuals with a solid work ethic and are a good person. Yet, whether the affable hard worker can make split-second decisions, handle QB pressures, and become obsessive about the process in adulthood is a different narrative. That's why I often favor elite dual-threat players; they offer an immediate high floor, unrelated to reading the field or being an elite student of the game. All made SBs within their rookie contracts: Jalen Hurts Cam Newton Wilson Kaepernick