Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

you want ralph???? here are my demands.


ralphs kidnapper

Recommended Posts

Well don't look at me. I had no idea who she was and that whe was a porn star. (suddenly the room erupts with chorus of "cough cough.....BullS@#$! Cough Cough BullS#@$!). What? No really. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Wacky or kidnapper or whatever ya wanna call yourself...who gives two sheeites about you OR Ralph being around here? If you stay fine...if not who cares, the Board won't go down in quality. Your posts while entertaining at times, are hardly the renditions of drama or prose that inspire profound memories. In fact the only thing memorable about them is how strange they were and the fact that you like cheap a$$ed food that gives you gas.

Basically get over yourself...wanna flop to another team??? Who cares :rolleyes:

Bio major here...a Hyena is NOT a dog. It aint even close....you can try and make a case for a genetic link somewhere but that won't fly. A wolf isn't a dog either and it's a hell of a lot more similar and closely related than a Hyena. "oh they're both from the same roots" well duhhhhh the same can be said for every freakin mammal alive. :rolleyes:

Wow talk about a collossal waste of time. You folks who are biting and humoring this tool with responses to his question don't look a whole lot better. Pretty pathetic scene all around I'd say.

Ralph you can ghost, spoof ip's or whatever ya want man, the simple fact is any decent web techy can track ya down if he has your ip....static or not. It can be a lot of work depending on how far ya go, but you're dreaming if you think Die Hard, Blade and the boys can't figure out 1. who you are and 2. where you are located. I can tell you from experience administrating networks that ANYTHING is traceable ultimately. The laymen around here might buy into your tripe, but I sure as hell won't.

I enjoyed some of your posts when you decided to use the "Ralph" persona, but your schtick is old now and with this lame attempt at either humor or tweaking the noses of the regulars around here, you have lowered yourself to the "insignificant, who cares" level.

The rest of the folks can go on trying to polish your knob, but ya won't catch that coming from me. Good riddance if this is your take. :doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I want to see Ralph lose an appendage. A finger would do, but I'm thinking much lower for the audacity of his attempt tp manipulate this board. So my official guess on the Tori Wells thing is:

Before Implants: Black Beauty

After: Star Wars, the Phantom Menace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said when this clown was saying he was about to die, it's a sorry arss with sick humor that can *uck everyone, get their sincere, sorrowful responses, then come back to say what a good laugh he had.

Mick and Counter Tre, not only do I agree with your thoughts on this twerp, I applaud them!

Take your quests and tacos to another stand El Sicko!:puke:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the fact that you responded, and in a big way CT,(going on about the dog thing is a wonderful example of this), I'd like to welcome you, and shamaran to the "we're not much better" club. There in lies the trap. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, Park City, but I have to agree with the buzzkills on this one. I think ralph is an attention-starved waste of time with a real sick sense of humor.

If you all insist on continung to humor this guy, I think this thread should be moved to the tailgate.

No doubt my voicing this opinion makes ol' ralph feel even better about himself, but that's my opinion nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice try Park City but I have no interest in answering the question. All I did was correct an obvious error that went on for several posts. Notice I didn't offer up any alternatives that would meet Ralphs material.

Can't put me in that club yet bud, I haven't been trying to stroke this tools ego by biting and "begging" him to come back via answers to his ridiculously stupid question. I will correct a Biological bullshiznit take like that every time though, regardless of the sport. Does that put me in the same category? No but if in your rationale it does...oh well some people think 9/11 was a conspiracy too :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expressing my opinion on this ill-wit and his rank humor is my only way to show the administration of this board, a few of us don't appreciate his assualt on the sincere feelings of board members.

Hey, if he's what floats everyone's boat, have at it. I, however, will hereafter ignore the idiot until I see a sincere apology from him to the entire board.

This silly-sack has seemed to slither back without so much as a "sorry I *ucked you all. Now, let's forget it and play my stupid triva (or whatever it is) game."

If I didn't reply to this, imp (at best), unfeeling clod (at worst), I'd be saying I think he's just keen with me too. Nothing could be further from the truth. I thought his orig. few posts were mildly humerous, but got old very quickly.

Certainly not the stuff, "Me Too Clubs" are made of IMO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk about your offseason, off topic threads, huh?

Personally, I soured on Ralph's schtick when he chose to "leave" the board to a self-stroking fanfare of herald trumpets, then studiously ignored sincere requests from the board as well as personal contacts from the staff that simply asked for a quick heads up as to the real situation. Guess I just don't much care for this kind of "performance art." Andy Kaufman he was not.

We've been talking all summer about what kind of threads should be moved from the main board, and I think the position of the admins and staff has been pretty clear; we're leaving just about everything here for now, it being the offseason and a slow news time and all, and only moving stuff when it gets "out of hand" in any way.

While I'm with those who find this particular thread utterly tasteless – and not all that scintillating – I say we let Ralph (or his wannabe, whichever), and whoever wants to play along with him, do so as long as it doesn't stray any further into name-calling and get even MORE juvenile.

If it does, it'll get moved. If not ... it'll just slide off page one on it's own in relatively short order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look guys, I admit that my brand of humor can sometimes be a l ittle different, but I certainly wasn't condoning this guys thread here. I was attempting fo mock him. I'm certainly not going to spend any of my time searching for answers for his "quests". With that said, i'm certainly not going to condemn someone for participating either. Hey, they may be going along with this just to see how it turns out, having a little fun with it or whatever. If you don't agree with it cool. But let's not be to quick to pass judgemnt on them either. Henry, you said it best.

"No doubt my voicing this opinion makes ol' ralph feel even better about himself, but that's my opinion nonetheless."

This is what I meant about joining the club. This would clearly be one of the goals, either that or he just wants to see the way the board reacts. It worked. Personaly, I could care less what the guys after. Like it or not, Om excluded he was responding to us, by responding,we probabely made his day. I really just don't take things like this all that seriously. It's just not worth it. In retrospect, I probably should have done what the majority of the board has obviously done. Just ignore him like you would the child of somebody at the store who insists upon throwing a tantrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Tay

Before: Torrid House

After: Return of Tori wells

next

we have a winner!!!!!!!!!!! probably. all i knew was somewhere along the line the bit*h got gifted! now i can further analyze the situation.

love me, hate me, think i'm wasting your time - i probably am. but you can't tell by writing styles alone that i'm *not* ralph, then it does explain a few other things i had to laugh about while seeing some forum battles wage in the past.

you wanna know all about ralph - you gotta save him. otherwise you'll never really know what happened. if you don't care, feel free at any time to make it a point to tell me you don't care. silence usually works better, but if care enough to tell me you don't care...

tay - is there a website out there with her history you referred to? maybe i should do more research on the subject. :)

QUEST 4 -

how long have israel and the palestinians been fighting and why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1922 (England had control of Palestine then), a British census showed the Jewish population had risen to about 11% of Palestine's 750,000 inhabitants. More than 300,000 immigrants arrived in the next 15 years.

Zionist-Arab antagonism boiled over into violent clashes in August 1929 when 133 Jews were killed by Palestinians and 110 Palestinians died at the hands of the British police.

Arab discontent again exploded into widespread civil disobedience during a general strike in 1936. By this time, the militant Zionist group Irgun Zvai Leumi was orchestrating attacks on Palestinian and British targets with the aim of "liberating" Palestine and Transjordan (modern-day Jordan) by force.

In July 1937, Britain, in a Royal Commission headed by former Secretary of State for India, Lord Peel, recommended partitioning the land into a Jewish state (about a third of British Mandate Palestine, including Galilee and the coastal plain) and an Arab one.

Palestinian and Arab representatives rejected this and demanded an end to immigration and the safeguarding of a single unified state with protection of minority rights. Violent opposition continued until 1938 when it was crushed with reinforcements from the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by panel

In 1922 (England had control of Palestine then), a British census showed the Jewish population had risen to about 11% of Palestine's 750,000 inhabitants. More than 300,000 immigrants arrived in the next 15 years.

Zionist-Arab antagonism boiled over into violent clashes in August 1929 when 133 Jews were killed by Palestinians and 110 Palestinians died at the hands of the British police.

Arab discontent again exploded into widespread civil disobedience during a general strike in 1936. By this time, the militant Zionist group Irgun Zvai Leumi was orchestrating attacks on Palestinian and British targets with the aim of "liberating" Palestine and Transjordan (modern-day Jordan) by force.

In July 1937, Britain, in a Royal Commission headed by former Secretary of State for India, Lord Peel, recommended partitioning the land into a Jewish state (about a third of British Mandate Palestine, including Galilee and the coastal plain) and an Arab one.

Palestinian and Arab representatives rejected this and demanded an end to immigration and the safeguarding of a single unified state with protection of minority rights. Violent opposition continued until 1938 when it was crushed with reinforcements from the UK.

so it was all over in 1938 and we've been imagining it ever since.

got it - riiiiight!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"how long have israel and the palestinians been fighting and why?"

I've tried to avoid this whole Ralph fiasco, but I feel like chiming in here.

This seems to be somewhat of a trick question. Israel wasn't Israel until 1948 so I'll say they've been fighting since 1948. Reason: land dispute. Simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...