jbooma Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 According to the Star and just reported on espnradio.com OJ Simpson is going to make money off of the anniversary of the murder of his wife. He is going to charge for interviews, appearances and even photo opps at the crime scene and graveyard :doh: :puke: If I was a judge in that area and someone just happend to hit him by accident with their car and kill him, i would let them work. This is just sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Hog Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 Did O.J. ever find the murderer of his wife? Isn't that what he said he was determined to do after the trial? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC4 Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 If he tries to make money, wouldn't he have to pay that as part of the judgement from the civil trial? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panel Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 That isn't going too far at all, The family of Nichole WILL NOT ask for this to be stopped, because they will get a pay day out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Symbol Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 You know, several years ago, I had a lot of respect for O.J., then his ex is murdered, won't say who I suspect, but none the less. Now he's doing this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinzfan4life Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 if it doesnt fit you must aquit -- hahaha -- he is so guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted May 27, 2004 Author Share Posted May 27, 2004 Originally posted by panel That isn't going too far at all, The family of Nichole WILL NOT ask for this to be stopped, because they will get a pay day out of it. then i don't know who is worse oj or her family :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankRizzo Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 how someone hasn't offed him by now is mind boggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big z Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 he'll always be loveable nordberg to me. if the family don't care, neither do i. but yeah, it is pretty disturbing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan913 Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 I must have forgotten this but didnt he recieve a NOT GUILTY verdict. I believe so. Get off his n***. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted May 27, 2004 Author Share Posted May 27, 2004 Originally posted by skinsfan913 I must have forgotten this but didnt he recieve a NOT GUILTY verdict. I believe so. Get off his n***. So I guess you are getting in line for the $500K picture next to her gravesite :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 its been soo long since the verdict and the crime, how is it they havent found any other leads yet. Correct me if im wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soliloquy Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 Originally posted by big z he'll always be loveable nordberg to me. It's hard to watch those movies now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Originally posted by Rejuvenated Canadian Hog Did O.J. ever find the murderer of his wife? Isn't that what he said he was determined to do after the trial? Evidentely, the killer is hiding somewhere on a Florida golf course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Originally posted by skinsfan913 I must have forgotten this but didnt he recieve a NOT GUILTY verdict. I believe so. Get off his n***. And Scott Peterson really DID go fishing on Christmas Eve. Its called the jury of public opinion. This juror says he's a murderer. I wouldn't be so quick to condemn the family for going after his money guys. Personally, I'd have blown his head off by now, and be happy to live with the consequences. I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep either. But for those who have lines they won't or can't cross, what other recourse do they have? Its the ONLY way, short of going my route, that they can hurt him? Its puzzling to me why you'd make them the bad guys here. I DO fault her family for allowing her to stay in a marriage when they knew he was beating on her and abusing her. But at this point, with the pain and injustice they've suffered, I think they deserve to be cut a little slack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Master Jay Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 The question should be who would pay OJ for something like this? It's funny how the rules dont apply when things dont work out in our favor. I met OJ once in my life so I dont know him but I dont live my life my double standards either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Die Hard Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 If he isn't guilty... then what's the significance of him doing interviews and posing around the former crime scene? I don't get it. Let's pay money to take photos of OJ at a crime scene for a murder he didn't commit? Or did he. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ax Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Originally posted by Jay Master Jay The question should be who would pay OJ for something like this? The same kind of sick, demented, lowlife, sub-species of maggot $hit that tries to marry convicted serial killers. You know, Democrats......................................:jk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Master Jay Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Because people are dumb enough to offer him thousands of dollars to keep this going. No matter if we feel he's guilty or innocent it's offer lets move on. What's more important who killed Ron and Nicole or who killed Kennedy?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancalagon the Black Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 He killed two people, including his wife...but this time he's gone TOO FAR!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Master Jay Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 I still say I wasn't there so I dont know or care. I'm more concerned with my friends coming home from Iraq alive and my Lakers winning the NBA Championship. I can think of other injustices other then OJ, Nicole and Ron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panel Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Originally posted by Jay Master Jay I still say I wasn't there so I dont know or care. I'm more concerned with my friends coming home from Iraq alive and my Lakers winning the NBA Championship. I can think of other injustices other then OJ, Nicole and Ron. Too True, so many people are 100% convinced that he did it, but they have no more incite than any one else. If I could make a deal were I could be given a million dollars if OJ did it, but lose my life if he was innocent, I wouldn't do it. There is a good enough chance that he didn't do it to put a doubt in my mind. As for what's the significance of him doing interviews and posing around the former crime scene? Simple, because he is getting payed! Wheather he did it or not wont change that, as long as there is some one who assumes he did it, wheater he did or not. I tell ya, the one thing that gets me about this whole OJ thing, is how PERSONAL some people take this, like he killed one of "their own" er somthing. I'm for locking up guilty people and all, But what is even worse than letting a guilty man go, is locking up an innocent man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 panel COME ON. No one else had the motive(and no Colombians do not strike rich ex-wives to prove their point, this ain't Bogota) nor the strength, nor the evidence pointing squarely at him. Sorry, if God said "Ok, you can be enriched by betting that he did it, but I will reveal to you his guilt or innocence and if you are wrong you die. " I'd take his bet and call OJ guilty. I'd stake my life on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancalagon the Black Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Let me put this to rest: OJ is guilty. One of the lawyers on his team was a professor of mine. He one day started talking about "jury nullification." The example he gave was a case that he had been involved in where the accused had committed (not been accused, but had COMMITTED) a double murder, but the police had planted evidence to beef up their case. He said that ALTHOUGH THE DEFENDANT WAS GUILTY, the jury correctly exercised their right of jury nullification to check the power of the police in fabricating the case. He essentially explicitly said that OJ did it, but that the police planted evidence to make their case stronger. Any questions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Master Jay Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 I will say the same thing I said when it happen the dog was there asked the dog.:laugh: We dont know we all have our opinions but I thought the law was innocent into proven guilty?:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.