BillyKilmer Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 I have taken the real wonderlic all of the people I work with have too.This not as tough IMO. 9/9 here for 50 In real life a 34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 7 of 9, i overanlyzed the 2 questions i lost. Seems a bit too easy though for IQ questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyZeb Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 Here's some more info/questions: http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonsofwashington Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 8/9 I got the last one wrong cause I'm an idiot, but where is the real 12 minute test. I could not find it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNatsFan Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 Sure looks like Denver values the results of this test! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom [Giants fan] Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 9/9 but it was easy. I think it is all in the way you read Reserve/Present. Reserve is obvious but Present can be Pre-sent or present as in past or present. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jethrodsp Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 9/9. Is this thing accurate. I would like to see the real woderlic test please... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinMac Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 I fail to see one question on this test that would judge someone's football intelligence (which is vastly different from book smarts or even common sense). What's the point of it? If you want to give an athlete a test, make it about game situations, clock management, and the like. Just because someone is a genius in other areas doesn't mean he will automatically get the hang of reading defenses, clock management, or that he is good at making split-second decisions. It's just another non-football test that has absolutely nothing to do with the game. Give me good, instinctive, smart football players. You can keep the Rhodes Scholar for your team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaFunky1 Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 Originally posted by sonsofwashington 8/9 I got the last one wrong cause I'm an idiot, but where is the real 12 minute test. I could not find it. The Wonderlic is like the SAT... unless you pay for the test, you can't take a real one. The Wonderlic people are very protective of the test, so it has to be administered by a professional (not sure who all is considered a pro). I took the test a few years ago. I was the first person she had take the test and finish it. I'm not sure it is due to my problem solving ability, or if she had only rocks taking it prior to me. If you really want to take one, look for a rehabilitation counselor in your area. He/she will probably let you take one for a nominal fee . Peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The X-Factor Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 9/9 That was so freaking easy. I can't believe some players got below 20. That's insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPare Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 I remember that someone posted an actual test on here a couple of years ago. It was not like this test. The ones that were on that web page are indicative of the kind of question you would find on the test, but to say that you would get a 50 if you scored 9/9 is a little much. Both this and the SAT measure the same kind of thing- the ability to analyse facts presented and respond in a short time frame. You could argue that this is a kind of SAT-lite. Here's a clue, if you didn't score above 1500 on your SAT, you're not getting a 50 on the full Wonderlic. - at least this was true when I took the SAT, I hear it's become like the achievement tests because it was found to be too discriminatory to inner city kids who go to crappy schools. Too bad, this is the first thing on the way to diluting the quality of the test out of existence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tchrpe1 Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228test.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Sick Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 I want to take that test that the Giants give. (I think it's the Giants.) The one that asks crazy stuff like "would you be a dog or a cat" and then have someone analyze it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aREDSKIN Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 9/9 here but I have to believe that the real thing is a little bit harder than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidFan Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 What did Ramsey score? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidFan Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 the Giants also ask "have you ever had thoughts of killing your mother?" bizarre stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 9/9 in 25 seconds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f_dallas Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 8/9 and I think I could have had the perfect score, but I thought time mattered and I rushed a bit. Shows you how smart I am.....I didn't even read the instructions. 10-1 says Vicks didn't get one of them right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Sassy Molassy Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 It seemed a bit easy. I went 9/9, not sure how accurate it is. Although I did get a 141 on my IQ test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.