Lavarleap56 Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I would think that individuals on this board would research information before they post crazy statements like dont sign Kearse he is injury prone. For all the haters on Kearse and his so called tons of injuries here are his stats. Year Team G Total Tckl Ast Sacks Int Yds Avg Lg TD Pass Def 1999 Tennessee Titans 16 57 48.0 9 14.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 9 2000 Tennessee Titans 16 52 36.0 16 11.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 6 2001 Tennessee Titans 16 36 25.0 11 10 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 2002 Tennessee Titans 4 4 3.0 1 2 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 2003 Tennessee Titans 14 41 28.0 13 9.5 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 TOTAL 66 190 140.0 50 47.5 1 0 0.0 0 0 17 FUMBLES Year Team G Fum Lost Fum Forced Own Rec Opp Rec Yards Tot Rec TD 1999 Tennessee Titans 16 0 0 6 0 1 14 1 1 2000 Tennessee Titans 16 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2001 Tennessee Titans 16 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2002 Tennessee Titans 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2003 Tennessee Titans 14 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 66 0 0 17 0 1 14 1 1 66 games out of a possible 80 not to injury prone to me and he had a freak ankle injury last season that kept him out.47.5 sacks over 5 seasons and missed a year due to injury . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I want Kearse. He will definitely solve one of our many problems! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I want Kearse, just not for a first rounder... EDIT: Just saw my posts per day thing... I really should do more work at work and less ExtremeSkins surfing, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OURYEAR#56 Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 He only solves our problems if he stays on the field. Think about picking up Kearse as a FA. Do you really want to risk spending about 7 million a year on a guy that's sacks have dwindled since his rookie year. He is injured proned. He's missed 14 games over five years. That alomost a whole season. He's too risky. Signing him would handicapp our ability to sure up other positions. It's just tooo risky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins26 Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I agree, I dont think Kearse is injury prone at all, I think he had a few unlucky injuries but other than that he's fine! He is a tremendous player, and probably the best pass rusher in the game right now, I'd love to have him. But he will cost A LOT of money, and he's ANOTHER superstar guy, like Lavar said, we need more hungry hard workers. I would LOVE to get Kearse. But we may be better off if we just get Winstrom and Howard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlobberKnockinFootball Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I'm with you buddy. I like Kearse. He will give us someone that can put pressure on the QB for once. One of the main reasons I like Kearse is because he would push Wynn right into a backup role or DT. Which he played in Jacksonville. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I STILL want Bert Berry more than any other de available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Hello!! he has missed a whole season worth of injuries. Thats called injury prone. If youre gonna pay him seven mil a year, thats seven millions dollars of contributions hes not gonna make. Too much of a risk. We have our own overpayed--underacheiving players to worry about. (yes Lavar). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Two Words........... David Boston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method man Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Originally posted by Skins_KDawg I STILL want Bert Berry more than any other de available. this is the chance for cerato and snyder to prove themselves. by getting kearse for 2 first rounders, they would be scrwing the franchise again. if they get a guy like berry who got 11.5 sacks and may come at a good price due to the fact that he is only 250 lbs kearse is sorta like sapp in that he is half as good as the media portrays him to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cope Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I really doubt that kearse will be franchised. Just this morning clayton reported the titans are 18 mil over the cap. That doesn't seem to be a good situation there. Coupled with the fact the franchise tag for Defensive ends is incredibily expensive (I don't know the number off hand but I believe its more than the CB position which is in the mid 5's) Kearse will be free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgraw238 Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I would take Kearse in a second. Can we fork out the 20m bonus to get him here and not kill the cap long term? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Can kearse stop the run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ummagumma Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Kearse is injury prone. Oh, I was supposed to stop saying that...sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OURYEAR#56 Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Kearse has bad feet. My fault I wasn't suppose to say that either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xanathos19 Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 missing over 16 games in 5 years equals about 4 games a year (a quarter of the season for the not-so-mathematically inclined). That doesn't seem like it is worth all the $$ that he is going to demand... Think about it...A QUARTER OF THE SEASON!!!! BULLSH!T that he's not injury prone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.