gutlead74 Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 This might be why http://www.nfl.com/stats/team Compound this with having a very strong wr class coming out in next years draft. In other words chill folks chill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petedaddy Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 clearly we're set then!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downbeat87 Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 great look up sir! im luvin that kyle shannahan hire da-da da DA daaaaa! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutlead74 Posted September 7, 2010 Author Share Posted September 7, 2010 Note who we are in the company of and the D ranking of the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petedaddy Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 note also that it was preseason and we were 2-2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 Preseason stats? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsCrushCowboys Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 it may make some feel better, but pre season stats are TOTALLY meaningless......hopefully the regular season stats are as impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfbovey Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 Can't fix everything in one offseason. I mean... New QB, new right and left tackles, new right guard... it would be nice to have a shiny new WR to instill more confidence. But, who would you have added this offseason? TO? Hell no. Washed up Housh? Two high draft choices for troubled WRs like Jackson or Brandon Marshall? Risky. We don't have a new WR because the front office isn't panicking like they have in the past. They aren't going to make a Jason Taylor like trade to fill a perceived weakness on the roster. It's called patience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderDOOM Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 guess our passing game will carry us then b/cuz we're 27th running the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutlead74 Posted September 7, 2010 Author Share Posted September 7, 2010 If they are so meaningless why are we ranked with very same teams that led the NFL last year in passing yards? This is a prime example of fan logic in the era of fantasy bs mentality. We don't have big name WRs so we suck. It's also a prime example of lemmings that don't believe their own eyes over what the announcers and analyst say. Seriously listen to the call for any game come on this sight and watch people just regurgitate the same stupid **** the media tells them to think, a lot of times it will be direct quotes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrifNick21 Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 It's called patience. Quoted for the m-f'n truth! This is what I have learned this offseason. I've questioned some of the moves at first, but now I look back on them and they look much better now than they did. Be patient, my friends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyfan57 Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 da-da da DA daaaaa! Could you please say what song that is for those of us who can't read music? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutlead74 Posted September 7, 2010 Author Share Posted September 7, 2010 guess our passing game will carry us then b/cuz we're 27th running the ball. That is a concern. Portis seemed to run well in the few carries he had so fingers crossed that he just needs more carries. One can hope right. Our rush D sucked too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petedaddy Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 If they are so meaningless why are we ranked with very same teams that led the NFL last year in passing yards?This is a prime example of fan logic in the era of fantasy bs mentality. We don't have big name WRs so we suck. It's also a prime example of lemmings that don't believe their own eyes over what the announcers and analyst say. Seriously listen to the call for any game come on this sight and watch people just regurgitate the same stupid **** the media tells them to think, a lot of times it will be direct quotes. well by your logic - Charlie Whitehurst, Matt Flynn, and Rhett Bomar will supplant Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, and Tom Brady this season. Also, look for Victor Cruz, Matt Willis, and Adrian Arrington to lead the league in receiving yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsCrushCowboys Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 In 2006, two of the NFL’s three highest rated pre season quarterbacks were Bruce Gradkowski and Cleo Lemon. In 2007, Gradkowski was 2nd in the NFL preseason in passing. In 2008, David Carr and Dan Orlovsky were two of the league’s three highest rated preseason quarterbacks. ------ By logic they should all be starting and winning a hell of a lot more games.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 If they are so meaningless why are we ranked with very same teams that led the NFL last year in passing yards?This is a prime example of fan logic in the era of fantasy bs mentality. We don't have big name WRs so we suck. It's also a prime example of lemmings that don't believe their own eyes over what the announcers and analyst say. Seriously listen to the call for any game come on this sight and watch people just regurgitate the same stupid **** the media tells them to think, a lot of times it will be direct quotes. Do you really believe the Colts, Saints, Giants and Patriots are among the 5 worst defenses in the league? Or that the Raiders, Bills and Browns are among the 10 best offenses? Is Rex Grossman going to pass for most of the yards in the Redskins super-duper passing attack this year? Come on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyHolt Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 we havent gotten one because the last 10 plus years of having a short thin #1less WR corp has proven more than adequate. It was always the QB's fault, remember? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutlead74 Posted September 7, 2010 Author Share Posted September 7, 2010 well by your logic - Charlie Whitehurst, Matt Flynn, and Rhett Bomar will supplant Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, and Tom Brady this season.Also, look for Victor Cruz, Matt Willis, and Adrian Arrington to lead the league in receiving yards. This will be a hard concept, so I will type real slow. The teams that lead the NFL in passing all share one thing great scheme and execution of the scheme. All those trees are a forest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petedaddy Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 This will be a hard concept, so I will type real slow. The teams that lead the NFL in passing all share one thing great scheme and execution of the scheme. All those trees are a forest. Dude, it's fine if you want to argue the merits of our passing game and say we are set at WR, but please don't use meaningless preseason stats to back your argument, especially when our starting QB missed two games. I, for one, was among the crowd that really wanted TJ Houshmandzadeh. Even though we didn't get him, I still think we can be an efficient passing team as long as Cooley, Moss, and Davis stay healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chase M Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 Am I the only one that thinks Armstrong is our future? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsCrushCowboys Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 Am I the only one that thinks Armstrong is our future? He could be the real deal......maybe not a #1, but a contributor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petedaddy Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 Am I the only one that thinks Armstrong is our future? I don't have a lot of faith in a 27 year old receiver finally getting his first shot being our "future", but I do think he could develop into a very solid # 3 receiver. I like his work ethic and fight. He has shown us a lot, and maybe he will surprise us for giving him a shot. If we get that out of him, we got a major steal!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutlead74 Posted September 7, 2010 Author Share Posted September 7, 2010 What other stats would you like me to use? Fine we will suck at offense because preseason is meaningless. Our 2nd teamers moved well vs the other guys ones cuz it was meaningless preseason. We might as well just give up. Hell the last decade of sucking in the preseason was no indicator of our offense at all, we always had great offenses after being pathetic in the preseason. My bad guys my bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins Anonymous Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 please don't use meaningless preseason stats to back your argument. Willie Parker is that you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted September 7, 2010 Share Posted September 7, 2010 What other stats would you like me to use?Fine we will suck at offense because preseason is meaningless. Our 2nd teamers moved well vs the other guys ones cuz it was meaningless preseason. We might as well just give up. Hell the last decade of sucking in the preseason was no indicator of our offense at all, we always had great offenses after being pathetic in the preseason. My bad guys my bad. Wow. Just wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.