Hubbs Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 She has 2 little nippers so I assessed her a medium sized dog demerit. I've always preferred girls with two little nippers. The giant pepperoni thing isn't attractive. Wait a second.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I've always preferred girls with two little nippers. The giant pepperoni thing isn't attractive.Wait a second.... I cant imagine what you must think of Mariah Carey's Bologna nips then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattFancy Posted December 22, 2009 Author Share Posted December 22, 2009 I cant imagine what you must think of Mariah Carey's Bologna nips then! What the??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 The Meat consumption part confuses me. Wouldnt there be a carbon offset by the killing of whatever supplied the meat?Like PITA saying that going vegetarian will help with global warming. It doesnt add up when looked at as a whole. The problem is twofold. First, methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, and because of what they eat and the way they digest it, cows emit a huge amount of methane. Second, cows require pastureland, which replaces forest but does not do as good a job as forest at controlling greenhouse gas. Livestock emit methane and other greenhouse gasses through excrement and belching. The FAO estimates that cow manure and flatulence generate 30 to 40 percent of total methane emissions from human-influenced activities. As demand for meat grows, the report explains, so does the need for pasture and cropland, making deforestation an additional concern; currently, according to the report, the livestock sector occupies 30 percent of ice-free land on the planet. Extensive grazing also takes a toll on arable land. The livestock sector also contributes to water depletion; currently, the livestock sector accounts for 8 percent of human water use globally. Animal wastes, antibiotics and hormones, as well as chemicals from tanneries and pesticides from feed crops, also contaminate water supplies. http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/3956 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzSkinsFan63 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurd Cudins Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I present to you the most dangerous thing on earth.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Thanks for the contribution to our little thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardi gras skin Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I've always preferred girls with two little nippers. If you didn't hate the earth you'd prefer girls that don't have nippers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I present to you the most dangerous thing on earth.... Indeed. And it looks like it's been more than two years since he had a safety or emissions inspection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 As for the original article, I don't know if the calculations are correct but it makes the point that all our choices have an impact on the environment. The person who commutes 50 miles each way in a Prius so that they can have a bigger home in the country probably has a much bigger footprint than someone who lives in a smaller house closer to where they work (even if the urbanite owns a Hummer). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 As for the original article, I don't know if the calculations are correct but it makes the point that all our choices have an impact on the environment.The person who commutes 50 miles each way in a Prius so that they can have a bigger home in the country probably has a much bigger footprint than someone who lives in a smaller house closer to where they work (even if the urbanite owns a Hummer). Yep, too many wish to narrow the focus to specific things rather than a overall impact of our life choices. They shoulda just bought a turbo diesel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeInJc aka M.I.A. Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I've put 25,000 miles on my 2008 Ford F-150 in the past year AND I have two dogs. Obama is not going to be pleased with my carbon footprint:silly: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.