iMeast Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I don't know if anybody else was listening to the show but when asked if he would place either Colt Brennan or Chase Daniel on the practice squad he (from what I could tell from his scatterbrained Cerrato answer) was that they wouldn't. If Daniel gets the axe and does not get put on the practice squad I don't really see him catching on anywhere. Then if needed next year I could see the Redskins bringing him back ala Marcus Mason this year. *2,000 Post!* HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike21 Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Not even Cerrato is dumb enough to keep 4 QBs on a roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirClintonPortis Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 What's the over/under the Cowpukes pick the cut one up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 They're not gonna put one or the other on the PS, eh? lol...that will cause quite a commotion around here ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botched Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Maybe Snyder bought us a couple extra roster spots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickalino Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I wouldn't be surprised to see that they DON'T put Daniel on the PS, if they keep Brennan. It's not like we have another 53 slots on the PS, but only a handful. They'll almost surely decide to use other positions on the PS, that are more needed. Positions we're more likely to actually USE, since we're unlikely to go thru 3 QB's this season, and even if we did, we'd probably bring up a vet instead of Daniel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilkyDiamonds Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 You know why folks use a shotgun? The scatter effect compensates for bad aim In all seriousness I dont think Vinny is going to let on to what his move will be, he may be trying to negotiate value for one of the other 3 Qb's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.T.real,lights,out Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Maybe Snyder bought us a couple extra roster spots Now that would be sweet! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bikie Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 doesn't make sense to me (vinny's logic, not your post)... mason was on our PS last year when the ravens nabbed him... the options of a player developing elsewhere than the NFL are practically zero right now... unless we are writing him off completely, I don't see why we wouldn't put chase on the PS... guess we could always hope the pats put him on their PS, let him develop there and then sign him back... :cool2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Not even Cerrato is dumb enough to keep 4 QBs on a roster. He just might be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mi6 Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 most of the folks on the PS are going to OL, and LBs. We don't have decent backups for our OL, and we do have some talented LBs that we may want to have around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinz4Life12 Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 no chance we keep 4 qbs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMeast Posted September 4, 2009 Author Share Posted September 4, 2009 From what Zorn said during his presser it sounds like CB5 is going to be the third QB. It also looks like there is going to be an extra running back. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ST is my boy Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Maybe that means Chase made the team, and since Colt cant be put on the PS then hes gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BALLz Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 His reasoning was basically that they want the PS players to actually be able to practice. Even the 2nd and 3rd QBs get an extremely limited number of snaps in practice. So a PS QB would be standing around doing nothing. Where as other positions can step in and take a few reps so the regulars don't get overworked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMeast Posted September 4, 2009 Author Share Posted September 4, 2009 His reasoning was basically that they want the PS players to actually be able to practice. Even the 2nd and 3rd QBs get an extremely limited number of snaps in practice. So a PS QB would be standing around doing nothing. Where as other positions can step in and take a few reps so the regulars don't get overworked. Yeah that is more or less what he said (less convoluted) and it surprisingly makes sense. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.