Kpayn17 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I have heard from multiple sources that the key to Hall signing with the Skins is the signing of Haynesworth. Hall said before his time with the Raiders that he functions best, and wants to play with, a good front four that can take pressure of the DBs. If Haynesworth comes back, word is Hall resigns, which is perhaps why Snyder made such an overt move in having dinner with Big Al's agent, so that Hall would sign before Haynesworth did, and before free agency. IMO, with the addition of this massive DT, cutting of Springs, and the retaining of a happy Carlos (cus Springs is gone) and Hall would make our defense go from 4th...bend and dont break, to a 4th ranked defense that can win games for you. Add cheap OL, scat-back, and OLB in FA or the draft (or Orakpo to add even more versiility), and we are sitting pretty for next year. What do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diesel22 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Hall played good ball for the most part while he was here......still, he is in no position to force the GM's hand in personnel decisions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins PR Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I think you can't call something a "report" if it's just you. Could you tell us more about these multiple sources? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcarey032 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I agree with most of your points with the exception of the cheap OL help. There is no reason not to draft really high OL help or if we can get a good FA. There was a major reason we lost games on the offensive side of the ball and that was because we couldn't protect the QB and we couldn't run the ball effectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I think you can't call something a "report" if it's just you.Could you tell us more about these multiple sources? A link would be nice too, and also happens to be typically required if you start a thread with "sources." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Get Pissed Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Agreed with everyone else, I'd like to read this "report". Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor21_INT_4_TD Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 his source is me... haha i thought of this reasoning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjunkies Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 If that's the case I'd show Hall the door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 his source is me... haha i thought of this reasoning I thought I had only read that in another thread... did you really say it just out of speculation? If so that's not exactly "multiple sources" as stated in this OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kpayn17 Posted February 25, 2009 Author Share Posted February 25, 2009 radio said multiple sources, so I don't have links. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins:Victory_or_Death Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Link no worky. Oh wait. There is no link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 radio said multiple sources, so I don't have links. Gotcha. You know which show it was, so someone could look it up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins:Victory_or_Death Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 radio said multiple sources, so I don't have links.Name the radio station and show then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbodiesel#44 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 What do you guys think?I think if you're going to cite multiple sources, you should list a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audible_Red40 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I have heard from multiple sources that the key to Hall signing with the Skins is the signing of Haynesworth. Hall said before his time with the Raiders that he functions best, and wants to play with, a good front four that can take pressure of the DBs. If Haynesworth comes back, word is Hall resigns, which is perhaps why Snyder made such an overt move in having dinner with Big Al's agent, so that Hall would sign before Haynesworth did, and before free agency. IMO, with the addition of this massive DT, cutting of Springs, and the retaining of a happy Carlos (cus Springs is gone) and Hall would make our defense go from 4th...bend and dont break, to a 4th ranked defense that can win games for you. Add cheap OL, scat-back, and OLB in FA or the draft (or Orakpo to add even more versiility), and we are sitting pretty for next year. What do you guys think? Well if this is the case, it's tampering like some speculate, thus we'll lose a draft pick. Thanks a lot "sources". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kpayn17 Posted February 25, 2009 Author Share Posted February 25, 2009 WTOP...about 5:30, just the sportstalk they have on there...they said 'sources tell us'...I'm not lying haha this would be an absurd thing to lie about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 radio said multiple sources, so I don't have links. Don't worry about it. I'll take your word for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyKilmer Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Radio talk show sources include Extremeskins as there most reliable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Radio talk show sources include Extremeskins as there most reliable lol I would believe it. We are the official message board of the Redskins after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pyro281 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 And in what world will the Skins have enough money to sign both Hall and Haynesworth? Both will want to be paid top money, and no amount of restructuring or cutting will get these 2 on the same team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeepRyder Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Shawn Springs is his source. Springs was on Doc Walkers show about a month ago saying this same thing when asked about him and Hall being back. Springs said both of them were watching what happens with the D-Line because corners want to play with a team that has a strong line like the Steelers as he used as an example. He said when their is pressure it puts more pressure on the QB and allows CBs to make more plays on the ball. So I know one source is Springs talking for him and hall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoRnAndRaiSedSkinsFan Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 ???? So after restructuring and releasing Washington...we are still over the cap. Jason Taylor is staying at full price, and we're going to magically sign Haynesworth and Hall? It's time people break down the cap numbers because with our cap situation, it seems delusional to think we're signing both players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINchiefer Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I heard the same thing a couple of weeks ago regarding Hall wanting a front that can apply pressure. It may have been one of the news channels but I'm not too sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pyro281 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Of course Hall wants a front 4 that makes his job easier. He's a gambler, which means a good front 4 exemplifies his talents, while a poor front 4 makes him be a better defender and take less chances. Which is why he and Rogers make a damn good tandem. Rogers is a better defender, Hall has the hands and nose for the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Acre Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I've never heard of a CB that played worse with a good front 4 than with a bad one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.