TonyRomoProBowl Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 NY Atlanta Zona Dallas Tampa Carolina Minny Skins Eagles Saints Bears Packers SF Seattle St L Det Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVUforREDSKINS Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 I disagree with ATL but whatever. I think you switch ATL and Car Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 I'd drop Zona to 7 and move everyone else up a spot. I think they're pretty overrated. Dallas, Tampa, and Carolina at 3-5 is pretty much a toss up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVUforREDSKINS Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 I'd drop Zona to 7 and move everyone else up a spot. I think they're pretty overrated. Dallas, Tampa, and Carolina at 3-5 is pretty much a toss up. yea Zona has been spanked by all NFCE teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted December 1, 2008 Author Share Posted December 1, 2008 yea Zona has been spanked by all NFCE teams they beat Dallas. And lost to the skins in a close one during the time the skins were at their best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 The Cards are 3-0 vs their lousy division but 4-5 outside of it. They haven't won a road game outside of their division either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted December 1, 2008 Author Share Posted December 1, 2008 This week is hard to rank the NFC.....Atlanta is not that good (IMO) yet they keep winning and would be in the playoffs today. Tampa is as good or better, yet Dallas beat them with Brad Johnson. It is still a mess from 2-9, however #1 and the bottom 4 are no brainers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fsunoles0021 Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 I think the Cards are really overrated in general. They'll be one and done in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blue Joe Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 I think Detroit is ranked too high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fsunoles0021 Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 I think Detroit is ranked too high. Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blue Joe Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 I think the Cards are really overrated in general. They'll be one and done in the playoffs.I agree. The Cardinals are way overrated. If they didn't have 6 games against the NFC West, they wouldn't have a chance at a playoff berth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurd Cudins Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 You have ATL ahead of CAR and TB. That's ridiculous considering they are in the same division and the latter two have a 1 game lead on the former. I think rankings should reflect a teams likelihood of making the playoffs. That said, here are mine: NYG ARI TB MIN CAR ATL DAL WAS CHI PHI NO GB SF SEA STL DET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 What's a "rankingfs" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spec138 Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 NY Atlanta Zona Dallas Tampa Carolina Minny Skins Eagles Saints Bears Packers SF Seattle St L Alabama OU Texas Florida USC Montana State Det Fixed 'em for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted December 1, 2008 Author Share Posted December 1, 2008 Fixed 'em for you I like it, but I like Texas behind Florida and ahead of OU. Bama Florida Texas OU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 Arizona is vastly overrated. They beat a struggling Dallas team who would kick their ass right now. They can't keep up with any NFC East teams, and get the definition of a cup cake schedule. Not to mention, have you ever seen a team that complains SO much after yet another loss? Either they're upset at their opponent's starting RB being injured, or they find a way to justify a loss because they were outsmarted. Its almost as bad as McNabb's whole, "Yeah, we lost... but we're still better. TRUST ME, WE'RE STILL REALLY REALLY GOOD!.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HapHaszard Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I think Detroit is ranked too high. You know I think your right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I disagree with ATL but whatever. I think you switch ATL and CarIt doesn't seem to really matter. All the teams just below the Giants are similar (inconsistant) and every week the #2 team loses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fsunoles0021 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 It doesn't seem to really matter. All the teams just below the Giants are similar (inconsistant) and every week the #2 team loses. The Bucs can't be in the discussion, I don't think, since they lost to the Cowboys with BRAD JOHNSON AT QUARTERBACK. The Rams destroyed the Cowboys with him and the Bucs couldn't even muster a win?! They just don't have enough play makers to be considered a top notch team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubble Screen Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 You have ATL ahead of CAR and TB. That's ridiculous considering they are in the same division and the latter two have a 1 game lead on the former. I think rankings should reflect a teams likelihood of making the playoffs. That said' date=' here are mine:NYG ARI TB MIN CAR ATL DAL WAS CHI PHI NO GB SF SEA STL DET[/quote'] No way Arizona is the 2nd best team in NFC, man. Seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubble Screen Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 The Bucs can't be in the discussion, I don't think, since they lost to the Cowboys with BRAD JOHNSON AT QUARTERBACK. The Rams destroyed the Cowboys with him and the Bucs couldn't even muster a win?! They just don't have enough play makers to be considered a top notch team. Dude, the Bucs lost AT Dallas. Plus that game was a long time ago. Bucs are certainly in the discussion of second best in NFC. The Cards certainly are not, that's for sure. Rams were also playing great those few weeks when they beat Dallas. They beat us at our place the week before, remember? Rams would have a different record if Jackson hadn't gotten hurt. They are obviously a lot better team when he plays. Plus you can't just focus on a few games, here and there, over the course of the season. You have to focus on the season as a WHOLE. Or in other words, what have the teams don't "to this point" in the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fsunoles0021 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 Dude, the Bucs lost AT Dallas. Plus that game was a long time ago. Bucs are certainly in the discussion of second best in NFC. The Cards certainly are not, that's for sure. Rams were also playing great those few weeks when they beat Dallas. They beat us at our place the week before, remember? Rams would have a different record if Jackson hadn't gotten hurt. They are obviously a lot better team when he plays. Plus you can't just focus on a few games, here and there, over the course of the season. You have to focus on the season as a WHOLE. Or in other words, what have the teams don't "to this point" in the season. I understand what you're saying but I'm extremely confident that, after watching Brad Johnson for three painful games, the Cowboys could not have competed with 95 percent of the teams in the NFL with BJ at quarterback. They seriously were as bad as the Lions with BJ at QB. You have to have MAJOR flaws in order to lose to the Cowboys with Brad Johnson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointyfootball Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 NY Atlanta Zona Dallas Tampa Carolina Minny Skins Eagles Saints Bears Packers SF Seattle St L Det You do know that Tampa and Carolina are both 9-3? My take: NY Carolina TB Dallas Minn. Atlanta New Orleans Eagles (homer!) Packers Arizona Wash Bears SFran St Louis Seattle Detroit Playoff predictions: NY (1) Carolina (2) Arizona (3) Minnesota (4) Tampa (5) Dallas (6) Most frustrating, as an Eagles fan, because #3 & #4 most likely will be homefield dogs in the first round of the playoffs. Just getting in would be a good thing this year because that first game is definitely winnable for whoever gets in as the 5 and 6 seed. PF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted December 2, 2008 Author Share Posted December 2, 2008 You do know that Tampa and Carolina are both 9-3? My take: NY Carolina TB Dallas Minn. Atlanta New Orleans Eagles (homer!) Packers Arizona Wash Bears SFran St Louis Seattle Detroit Playoff predictions: NY (1) Carolina (2) Arizona (3) Minnesota (4) Tampa (5) Dallas (6) Most frustrating, as an Eagles fan, because #3 & #4 most likely will be homefield dogs in the first round of the playoffs. Just getting in would be a good thing this year because that first game is definitely winnable for whoever gets in as the 5 and 6 seed. PF You make a great point across the board especially the point about the 3 and 4 seeds this year! I have Atlanta too high. I do realize that, and i am not a true believer in them at this point, however, just over a week ago they beat the pulp out of Carolina, and I cant rank Tampa higher based on them losing to a Romo sits to pee-less (Brad Johnson led Dallas team. So the whole NFCSouth is a mashed up mess that should be ironed out in the next couple of weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurd Cudins Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 No way Arizona is the 2nd best team in NFC, man. Seriously?Thank you for reading my entire post. I said that rankings should reflect likelihood to make the playoffs. The Cards are virtually guaranteed to win their division, which is why they are #2. I think they will lose in the first round of the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.