Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

NYT: Muslim Voters Detect a Snub From Obama


SkinsHokieFan

Recommended Posts

Strategically, it's better for Obama to distance himself from Muslims, because about 10% of Americans believe he's actually a Muslim. If he went to a mosque, you can bet that republicand would try to use that fact to make him look like a Muslim, which he clearly has stated he is not.

Muslims will vote for Obama anyway. Obama can freely criticize 1) blacks and 2) Muslims, because they're easy votes for Obama, snubs or no snubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strategically, it's better for Obama to distance himself from Muslims, because about 10% of Americans believe he's actually a Muslim. If he went to a mosque, you can bet that republicand would try to use that fact to make him look like a Muslim, which he clearly has stated he is not.

Muslims will vote for Obama anyway. Obama can freely criticize 1) blacks and 2) Muslims, because they're easy votes for Obama, snubs or no snubs.

I think he has done a really good job of offending SHF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strategically, it's better for Obama to distance himself from Muslims, because about 10% of Americans believe he's actually a Muslim. If he went to a mosque, you can bet that republicand would try to use that fact to make him look like a Muslim, which he clearly has stated he is not.

Muslims will vote for Obama anyway. Obama can freely criticize 1) blacks and 2) Muslims, because they're easy votes for Obama, snubs or no snubs.

Sadly this is dead on true.

Because of those rumors of course he wants to distance himself. But, of course now a big chunk of voters in crucial states (VA, OH, and MI, who has the largest muslim population in the U.S.) feels somewhat isolated. Its a damned if he do damned if he don't situation. He has had numerous invitations to show up at Mosques but hasn't replied due to the fact that pictures of him at a Mosque could potentiality damage him.

When he does visit Mosques you can bet that he won't want to get to close because of the crazy spin that will be put on the pics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he has done a really good job of offending SHF.

Liberty is right to nail SHF on this. You are missing the point. I find shf's selective outrage over this issue to be purely based on partisanship grounds. Obama's campaign actions were inexcusable, however there is a party out there that actively hates and scapegoats Muslims (and it's not the democratic party). It's disgusting. The party's base views people like SHF as a threat, damn his politics.

SHF is a good guy, but I find it troubling that he still identifies as a republican ( partisan one at that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say it.

BTW, I wasn't kidding when I said that, some mosques have some bad connections. He better do his research if he doesn't or yet again he will show bad judgement.

There are actually a couple in NOVA that were under investigation for shady connections. Not sure whatever happend with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liberty is right to nail SHF on this. You are missing the point. I find shf's selective outrage over this issue to be purely based on partisanship grounds. Obama's campaign actions were inexcusable, however there is a party out there that actively hates and scapegoats Muslims (and it's not the democratic party). It's disgusting. The party's base views people like SHF as a threat, damn his politics.

SHF is a good guy, but I find it troubling that he still identifies as a republican ( partisan one at that).

'

You find it troubling that SHF is a good guy because he identifies himself as a republican because the "party actively hates and scapegoats Muslims"? I don't pretend to know why SHF is a republican but I'm sure he has his reasons and would be happy to explain them to you.

Hey, at least he doesn't identify himself with the other party that'll say anything to get a minority vote. Would you be happier if he identified with that one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'

You find it troubling that SHF is a good guy because he identifies himself as a republican because the "party actively hates and scapegoats Muslims"? I don't pretend to know why SHF is a republican but I'm sure he has his reasons and would be happy to explain them to you.

Hey, at least he doesn't identify himself with the other party that'll say anything to get a minority vote. Would you be happier if he identified with that one?

I am not asking or telling him to identify with any party. It's not one or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you are confused about my criticism... I know you are a muslim, I know you don't think muslims are bad. However, it is your political compatriots which advocate calling Obama a Muslim when he says he is not. Why? Because calling someone a muslim IS a smear to them, which is exactly why they use it on Obama.

Liberty is right to nail SHF on this. You are missing the point. I find shf's selective outrage over this issue to be purely based on partisanship grounds. Obama's campaign actions were inexcusable, however there is a party out there that actively hates and scapegoats Muslims (and it's not the democratic party). It's disgusting. The party's base views people like SHF as a threat, damn his politics.

SHF is a good guy, but I find it troubling that he still identifies as a republican ( partisan one at that).

Simply put, and again for serious I am actually stunned my posting history doesn't reflect this, I am equal opportunity Muslim basher-basher. If my thread history didn't go back to March 2006, I'd probably triple the amount of threads I could post in the tailgate reflecting that.

Please, get rid of the cognitive dissonance you are displaying because I take shots at the other guy who is campaigning on change and inclusion, when his actions are not reflecting that. The fact that you are describing this as "selective outrage" is quite honestly a joke.

Of course, it just so happens I agree with every thread Sarge posts on Muslims and Islam; right guys? :rolleyes:

Or when a good old Muslim bash starts occuring in front of me at some political event, I stand silent. Yup, that SHF, silent....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liberty is right to nail SHF on this. You are missing the point. I find shf's selective outrage over this issue to be purely based on partisanship grounds. Obama's campaign actions were inexcusable, however there is a party out there that actively hates and scapegoats Muslims (and it's not the democratic party). It's disgusting. The party's base views people like SHF as a threat, damn his politics.

SHF is a good guy, but I find it troubling that he still identifies as a republican ( partisan one at that).

What? I feel like I must be reading this thread wrong. Are you saying that a Muslim who identifies himself as Republican is a sell out to his people or something?

I hope not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? I feel like I must be reading this thread wrong. Are you saying that a Muslim who identifies himself as Republican is a sell out to his people or something?

I hope not.

I have been hearing that since 2000 :)

Some people call it stupidity. I call it trying to force change from within and hoping that by people meeting me it has some sort of an impact

Of course, I tend to over value my self worth quite a bit :silly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Forget the bull****. Do what's right.

It would be nice but in this particular scenario it's not really plausible. I'll settle for him doing what's right once he's IN office, he can't get there without bull****ting. Unfortunately that is just the way it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? I feel like I must be reading this thread wrong. Are you saying that a Muslim who identifies himself as Republican is a sell out to his people or something?

I hope not.

I know what's it like to be called a sell-out (it stings), so no. I just worry about his lack of perspective and find his selective outrage hollow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been hearing that since 2000 :)

Some people call it stupidity. I call it trying to force change from within and hoping that by people meeting me it has some sort of an impact

Of course, I tend to over value my self worth quite a bit :silly:

You have blown up the straw men ignorant posters try to hoist on your race and/or faith in thread after thread with cool-headed, polite truth. You've got nothing to prove. You've made an impact on me. :applause:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been hearing that since 2000 :)

Some people call it stupidity. I call it trying to force change from within and hoping that by people meeting me it has some sort of an impact

Of course, I tend to over value my self worth quite a bit :silly:

I tried to do that with socialism on the board. Not that effective. And I am worth WAYYY more than you are :).

By the way, I was annoyed that Obama did not say "who the !#$% cares if I am a Muslim" rather than "Hell no I ain't no Muslim". However, considering that a biracial candidate who was raised by his white family is running as "the black president" (thanks to a number of factors, but not limited to: the media, blacks themselves, white liberals, the one-drop rule, etc). As for me, as long as the dude isn't a Republican, he is acceptable ;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to do that with socialism on the board. Not that effective. And I am worth WAYYY more than you are :).

By the way, I was annoyed that Obama did not say "who the !#$% cares if I am a Muslim" rather than "Hell no I ain't no Muslim".

He said worse, IMO which is part of the reason why Muslims are outraged. He said he "never" was a Muslim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to do that with socialism on the board. Not that effective. And I am worth WAYYY more than you are :).

By the way, I was annoyed that Obama did not say "who the !#$% cares if I am a Muslim" rather than "Hell no I ain't no Muslim". However, considering that a biracial candidate who was raised by his white family is running as "the black president" (thanks to a number of factors, but not limited to: the media, blacks themselves, white liberals, the one-drop rule, etc). As for me, as long as the dude isn't a Republican, he is acceptable ;).

:laugh:

You are consistant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...