Larry Posted June 15, 2008 Share Posted June 15, 2008 Becuase they should be tried by a military tribunal which Bush has been trying to do and hasn't been able to. he has been told that is unconstitutional. Uh, as long as we're in the land of simple declarative insults without support . . . You've obviously been living in an alternate universe for quite some time. in fact, while I'll recognize that your partisan credentials are challenged by few on this board, I'm rather stunned that even you could type this with a straight face. Suffice it to say that the only reason tribunals are (slowly) approaching is because Bush lost a Supreme Court decision in which he announced his authority to hold people forever with no proceedings whatsoever. When the court ordered him to hold some form of due process, Bush consented and announced that he would permit Congress to pass some rules, if he agreed with them. Congress did so. Huh, what. I kinda lost my place. Your one of those evil, bush administration conspiricy types, huh?? We don't agree. nuff said! Now, me, I'd leave off the insults and attacks. But I would have a sneaking suspicion that these events he's describing are some heavily-spun versions of events which I suspect would likely turn out to be somewhat different if more information were provided. Like, a link to some stories. (Yes, that's a hint to please back up your rather hard to believe claims.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.