Stonoman Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Give a copy to every Skin.LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangan Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Idiots.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mooka Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Rookie Head Coach > Hall of Fame coach. gotcha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revallenjr Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 If I'm not mistaken, the most important prediction was that we win. Hey who cares if the vikings have the best QB, Best RBs and Best coaches, if we win the game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins n' Bones Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Let the media hate continue to roll in.....I love it. Just more to add to that huge chip growing on the Redskins shoulders........which is why they will CRUSH the Vikings, and go on from there. :vikesuck: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4481 Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 If I'm not mistaken, the most important prediction was that we win. Hey who cares if the vikings have the best QB, Best RBs and Best coaches, if we win the game? I care. Why? Because its absolute bull**** and an insult to say that a rookie HC is better than a HOF Head Coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UltimateSkins Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 This writer must be auditioning for SI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smurf85 Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 How the hell do they have them having better RBs.Sportingnews does not know what they are talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyriggins Posted September 3, 2006 Author Share Posted September 3, 2006 How the hell do they have them having better RBs.Sportingnews does not know what they are talking about. Maybe they think Portis is not playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philal0102 Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Yeah, for any idiot to say that the Vikings has the edge over us, coaching wise, should be fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roanoker Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Edge in coaching? Is that writer for Sporting News on crack? Perhaps a closet member on the Viking Love Boat. :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanster Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 In all seriousness, Childress has lost far fewer games than Gibbs. He is clearly the superior coach. Plus when you look at preseason production, Chester Taylor is clearly a better running back that Portis. I'd say that this is a fair report. THAT STATEMENT IS ABOUT AS DUMB AS A BOX OF ROCKS.wHAT WORLD ARE YOU LIVING IN??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanster Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Everything in this seems backwards. Obviously, we have better coaches. With Springs out, I'd say they actually have a better secondary. LBs and WRs are definitely ours. If Griffin and Daniels are healthy, the DL might be even, but I can see why some writers might be inclined to pick the Vikes. Our guys might not be big names, but they're as stout as anyone against the run. Betts is as good as anyone in their depleted RB core. SOME OF THE THINGS YOU SAY OR LEGITIMATE BUT THE FACT THAT YOU SAY A BETTER SECONDARY THAN WE DO WITH OR WITHOUT sHAWN sPRINGS IS UBSURD. YOU WILL THE SAME PERSON WEARING A sEAN tAYLOR COME GAMEDAY OR MAYBE YOU STILL HAVE A SMOOT JERSEY!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psrichmond Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 They think the Vikings have better coaching, running backs and Def line? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atloldskin Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 A big joke for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 I have to believe there's an explaination in there for the checkmark beside Coaching in that graphic. I'm just not going to pay to see it. Probably because I am scared they actually may believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeownU Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 So, if I've got this right, they're saying the Vikings have the advantage in every major aspect of this game (including coaching :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: ) but we win 17-14?How in the hell do these people get their jobs? While normally, I wouldn't mind stirring the pot here. But I got to tell you, I couldn't agree with you more on this one. How can you give all the advantages to one team, but pick the other?????? Stupid, stupid, stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWFLSkins Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 While normally, I wouldn't mind stirring the pot here. But I got to tell you, I couldn't agree with you more on this one. How can you give all the advantages to one team, but pick the other??????Stupid, stupid, stupid. Having read your posts lately I would think you have done something with the pot other than stirring it--------j/k btw, how is the She-o this AM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sag1277 Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 im going to print that article and wipe my a@# with it!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.