Lil Kenzo Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I really prefer not to get Randel-El and instead go after our most desperate need...a #2 receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Anybody but randle-el...I am just hoping we get outbid. The other three guys I am perfectly fine with. Do you think we are looking at Carter at LB or DE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhutanibeast Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 holy good lord almighty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 We have to keep in mind that our coaches and front office are clearly incapable of recognizing talent when they see it. Lets face it, Santana Moss will NEVER be a #1 receiver in this league! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
talk show host Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I can't see us going after randel el AND lloyd. Considering Lloyd would require a 1st round draft pick as compensation and Randel El is the premiere receiver on the market, I don't think we go after both. It would be SICK though if we got both. And it would also probably mean we'd be getting rid of Patten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shallyshal Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Redskins | Team targeting Randle ElFri, 10 Mar 2006 15:02:40 -0800 The Associated Press reports the Washington Redskins are targeting free agent WR Antwaan Randle El (Steelers) via free agency, according to a league official. He spoke on condition of anonymity because under league rules, the team is not allowed to contact the players until the market opens at 12:01 a.m. EST Saturday, March 11. Randle El is one of four free agents the Reskins are targeting. As noted earlier, the other three are free agent WR Brandon Lloyd (49ers), LB/DE Andre Carter (49ers) and S Adam Archuleta (Rams). :doh: God I hope they are wrong... and before everybody goes off the deep end... this site had the redskins going after bruce a couple of days ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shallyshal Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Anybody but randle-el...I am just hoping we get outbid. The other three guys I am perfectly fine with. Do you think we are looking at Carter at LB or DE? hybrid role... like charles haley.. carter totally torched samuels from the def end spot the year before last. he has amazing closing speed from the edge. i do not know how strng he is at the point of attack, so he won't be a 3 down player. he is at 265 so that is heavy for a linebacker and he does not drop back in coverage that well. what he truly does well is get after the passer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 hybrid role... like charles haley.. carter totally torched samuels from the def end spot the year before last. he has amazing closing speed fromthe edge. i do not know how strng he is at the point of attack, so he won't be a 4 down player. he is at 265 so that is heavy for a linebacker and he does not drop back in coverage that well. what he truly does well is get after the passer He finished 2002 with 54 tackles and 13 sacks, sounds like he could be a steal if Williams can coach him up to his potential. Last year he had 44 tackles and 5 sacks...in that hybrid role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shallyshal Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I can't see us going after randel el AND lloyd. Considering Lloyd would require a 1st round draft pick as compensation and Randel El is the premiere receiver on the market, I don't think we go after both. It would be SICK though if we got both. And it would also probably mean we'd be getting rid of Patten. lloyd would only require a 1 if we cannot agree on a trade.. they will likely accept a 2nd rounder or perhaps a player in exchange.. perhaps betts, although they do have gore and others at runner...or perhaps dockery ?? you are absolutely correct that having patten would make no sense at that point. same with jacobs. and maybe even thrash, although he is more of a special teamer now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skeenzfan Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 how come other ppl's 7th rounders (givens), second rounders(branch), first rounders (walker) become good to great receivers and we just can't draft a WR to save our lives? Maybe we need to take a look at our scouting department. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinFan63 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 We have to keep in mind that our coaches and front office are clearly incapable of recognizing talent when they see it. Lets face it, Santana Moss will NEVER be a #1 receiver in this league! Yep, that was a disaster. And the deal to get Portis was by far,the dumbest thing they've ever done! (Like he'll ever be any good) Hail!:point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
talk show host Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Anybody but randle-el...I am just hoping we get outbid. The other three guys I am perfectly fine with. Do you think we are looking at Carter at LB or DE? i was just thinking: if we go after randel-el and lloyd it would make randel el our #3 receiver. and I love him as a #3 b/c that means we dont need to have a roster spot used up by a #3QB. And as a #3 receiver, randel el could be QB in a pinch and we'd still have our #1 and #2 receivers on the field. Goodbye Patten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skeenzfan Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I am praying that we don't sign Randel-El. He will be nothing but an overpaid return guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da#1skinsfan Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I cant imagine Patten is out after his short stint here...that doesnt make any sense. My bet is they are targeting both receivers, and probably keeping an eye on Givens as well, and seeing what deal they can work out for 1 of the above. Lloyd costs a pick, and Raandle El is being pursued by everyone under the sun and WILL be overpaid...I cant imagine they pick up both guys...that would be one insane receiving corps, where there are other areas to address in terms of depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinswin Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 that would be disgusting. If the skins do this, this will be a blunder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hog Fever Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 and Super Smart. :laugh: :laugh: I think we would go after Lloyd OR Randle El but I can’t see us going after both. We still have Patten, who is a decent receiver who got hurt before he could get comfortable, and I can’t see Gibbs getting rid of Thrash. Randle El wants to be at least a #2 receiver; he’s certainly going to expect to be paid like one. I doubt he could be that with Lloyd and Patten on the team. I’m not knocking Randle El, I think he would fit nicely. But if we go after one we don’t need to go after the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinnedAussie Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 I read on KFFL a couple of days ago that Archuleta was ready to travel to DC, but when FA was delayed, he delayed his trip. People are using his stats as a negative, but I see it as opposing teams wouldn't throw it his way (much like teams don't throw to Roland), so you won't get an INT if you don't get it thrown to your side. As someone mentioned, Lloyd will cost us a first round draft pick, something we don't have this year, so there's no chance there. Venturini (sp) to the Girls? Puleese, if you are going to break news, at least know who it is you are talking about. However, don't think that the Skins can afford Vinatieri as he would want big dollars. Would Andre Carter be the fix we need at DL, or would he be a replacement for Lavar? If we have the dollars, go after Witherspoon or Thornton, and then go for Kemoeatu if we sign one of the LB's. Isn't Javon Walker's agent Drew Rosenhaus? If so, there's two reasons to steer clear of him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da#1skinsfan Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 Is all this Venturini stuff a joke in a thread I missed? The dudes name is Vinateiri (not sure if Im spelling it right) but Vinateiri at least is phonetically correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinnedAussie Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 Is all this Venturini stuff a joke in a thread I missed?The dudes name is Vinateiri (not sure if Im spelling it right) but Vinateiri at least is phonetically correct You obviously skipped over post #15! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPstretch Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 Isn't Javon Walker's agent Drew Rosenhaus? If so, there's two reasons to steer clear of him! not anymore, walker fired him during the season last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooleyNaMean Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 If the skins do this, this will be a blunder. That's what people were saying last year when we traded for Moss. Have faith in the front office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunell Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 I want no part of Javon Walker, but Randle El and Lloyd would be fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1Redskins Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 So basically the Redskins are interested in signing just about everyone Hahaha! I thought they were trying to pick up Brandon Lloyd... Who's next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonMagicJuan Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 i hope not...nothing against my man Randel-El but he def wont be a #2 but HE COULD BE a great #3(slot reciever) and our main punt/kick returner...we could kill 3 birds with one stone so to speak! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPstretch Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 we could sign randle el but i think we would still need to draft mo stovall. randle el is essentially the same as david patten, both are small quick receivers. signing him wont get us what we need which is a big posession reciever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.